Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GUCKERT Story Grew an IMUS Leg Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:43 AM
Original message
The GUCKERT Story Grew an IMUS Leg Today
I can't vouch that this is the first mention by IMUS, and given the repulsiveness of IMUS, his take is not our preferred framing, but here it is:

He said that there was a story out there about a fake reporter getting into White House briefings under an assumed name, who had posted "nekkid pictures of himself on the web, so can we say HE'S A QUEER? And we might have assumed he would be CUTE, but he's a FAT, BALD (unintelligible, something like 'schmo')." (paraphrase)

Given his own mental and physical repulsiveness and that his description of GUCKERT could fit Bernard and Norm COLEMAN's nephew Sid---it ALMOST makes one want to defend GUCKERT----ALMOST, O.K., the feeling has passed on that point.

So his mentionings were mostly promos for the story. The actual handling of it was not a discussion segment, just one of those schtick impersonations by Charles, this one by "Jack NICHOLSON". Later MATALIN said that "you can bet there is some digging going on in the bowels" of the WH to find out who is linked to GUCKERT and got him in. I don't know whether I heard it in this circus or somewhere else that the credentialing is NOT done personaly by Scotty, that it is some other flunky below him.

Anyway, IMUS speeds the story into certain demographics. Unfortunately, it's Friday, so the gap till next week works against the joementum of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Guckert looks damn better than Imus.
Not defending Guckert though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, but I think he's got an unanny resemblence to
Pee Wee Herman.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Who Guckert?
no Pee Wee is far cuter.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Real Name Jm D. GUCKERT, a.k.a., "Jeff GANNON" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Has anyone seen Bernard and Jeff Gannon in the same place?
They sure do look alike.

Maybe that would be a funny approach to this.

Maybe "Jeff Gannon" also tells his clients he's really Bernard from the Imus show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Haha, Pal-blm! And "McGUIRK" Could Be a Pseudonym for "GUCKERT"! n/t
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 10:45 AM by UTUSN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Some Googling of Bernard
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 11:01 AM by UTUSN

*******QUOTE*******

…with the tip of my Timberland shoe.

Executive Producer of the “Imus in the Morning” radio program, Bernard McGuirk, expressing how he would apologize to New York Times columnist, Maureen Dowd, for publicly criticizing her labeling of the Church sex abuse scandal as pedophilia, rather than a homosexual, problem. McGuirk, apparently a former, cock-sucking altar boy himself, seems to be revealing, for a change, some deep-rooted hatred of women and confusion with the Church that turned him into little Blowjob Bernie. His frequently lame, yet hysterical and misogynistic, anti-gay diatribes are consistent with his dismal attempts at hyper-masculinity which are about as convincing as Liberace’s butch. Maybe it’s the bitter resentment at not quite fitting the Chelsea-boy-muscle-queen image he tries so desperately, and unsuccessfully, to pull off. His on-air fantasies about wrestling with little boys in underwear don’t do much to dispel where he’s coming from (so to speak) either. No one gives a fuck about homos, except you Bernie. Leave them alone, or is the wife not doing it for you? Maybe it's the Timberland treatment. Giggling like a coy schoolgirl, dried up curmudgeon Don Imus, (who tortures his listeners by gushing over his son like Kathy Lee Gifford peaking on ecstasy -- when he’s not wallowing in his martyrdom and boring the fuck out of everyone selflessly promoting the Imus Ranch - his kids-with-cancer-tax-write-off) edges him on like the teenage bully who never gets laid. Anus in the Morning would be a more apt name for a show with these fucking assholes.

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. And are we then to assume the security checks are done by
"flunkies" in the FBI or Secret Service? Gee, that really reflects well on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC