Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Pat Buchanan REALLY just defend a gay male prostitute on National TV?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:25 PM
Original message
Did Pat Buchanan REALLY just defend a gay male prostitute on National TV?
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 07:51 PM by IdaBriggs
Hardball with Chris Matthews -- Pat said he's okay with Gannon because at least he's asking the questions!!!

On Edit: (A Rough Transcript by Me)

Chris: "Did you have any ringers in the Nixon White House or Reagan White House -- anybody you planted in the White House press room?"

Pat: "No - there were people, reporters and columnists and others who were deeply devoted to Nixon and people who we would go to and say look, the president's got something to say on this issue..."

Chris: "Sure, but they represented a news organization."

Pat: "They were legitimate columnists and commentators."

Chris: "How does that compare to this?"

Pat: "They've got a new world of journalism, Chris. You've got websites, like you've got Andrew Sullivan who does a website and Salon.com and all these new things."

Chris: "But why is this guy operating on an alias?"

Pat: "I don't know." (laughs)

Chris: "And why would you defend it?"

Pat: "Well, the point is --"

Chris: "I mean, a byline (Pat tries to interrupt with "I'm saying"), Pat, a byline is a byline. You put your name on the article -- your street Creed on that article, and your good name. If its somebody else's name on the article, what does it possibly mean?"

Pat: "Look, I think as long as the Secret Service knows who this guy is, it doesn't bother me that he's using a different name -- that he writes under a different name."

Chris: "Does it bother you that the White House is playing ball with what looks like a ringer?"

Pat: "uh --"

Chris: "A guy asking phony questions that are softballs and teeing up stupid questions for the White House press secretary?"

Pat: "So what? McClellan's answering the questions and the President's answering the questions. You get the same -- I mean, you are going to get an answer from the President of the United States and legitimate reporters decide --

Chris: "What would you do if the other side was doing this?"

Pat: "Well, my guess is -- look -- "

Chris: "Would you say -- if you could break this story in a column of yours, and you dug this thing up that they had a ringer in there in say, the Clinton White House wouldn't you think that a good story?"

(then some talk about how when folks are campaigning, each side tries to make the other one look stupid)

Later: Pat says "Its harmless!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF!!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. he defended another rightwing shill, thats all, they closed ranks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was disappointed in Pat this time n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think Pat knows what an 'escort' service really is...LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's a twofer
Pat not only thinks gays are animals, the mere thought of pornography makes him apoplectic --- FILTH! SEWAGE!! PTUI!

He's reeeally being a good soldier today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indianablue Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Even Tweety said Pat defended the indefensible. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. But he got shut down in the end.
Bottomline, the White House press briefs are already weak on information, so it's too tempting to turn the cameras on the characters in the press room to make them the story. Which defeats the purpose of the White House press briefings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, maybe Pat likes a good...
mandate too, from time to time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm kicking for the editing I did with the transcript. Woo, me! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. yep, LOL-- he is now a defender of male prostitution! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pat: "It's Harmless!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC