Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reminder: Whiny neo-cons hate free speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:46 PM
Original message
Reminder: Whiny neo-cons hate free speech
U.S. Soldier's Uniform Hangs From Noose In Front Of Home


POSTED: 10:58 am EST February 9, 2005

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Nestled in a quiet Sacramento neighborhood is a very loud political statement that is testing the very foundation of the right to free speech.



Hanging from a house in Land Park a soldier's uniform in a noose dangles from a rooftop. The words "your tax dollars at work" are scrolled across the chest.

In this community, this homeowners' view of the war in Iraq has not gone unnoticed.

"I think it's the ultimate sign of disrespect. We have troops dying for us," Land Park resident Mark Cohen said.

"(I'm) annoyed and disgusted. I think if this is the way someone feels they can find a better way to vent their opinions," Land Park resident Pete Miles said.

The homeowners behind the controversy are Steve and Virginia Pearcy. They released a statement saying, "There will always be people who are offended by political speech, and the most important forum of all ... is one's own residence. The First Amendment is meaningless unless dissent is allowed."<<<

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least the autorities in Sacramento, CA are respecting the
First Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. "(I'm) annoyed and disgusted."
"I think if this is the way someone feels they can find a better way to vent their opinions,"

Meaning: "somewhere I don't have to come into any contact with it and be forced to think."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well if Ward Churchill is any indicator
These people can expect no support from the democrats when the MIB come for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. This was torn down last week.
A radio station incited several people to destroy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr fry Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. i will defend his right to say it

ironic that the image he is hanging is the same image that fought to create his ability to express himself in such a fashion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bullshit.
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 03:56 PM by bowens43
Did you even bother to read the article? Did you read the sign that was there? It's the bush administration that is killing these soldiers. That's what he was saying. The hanging is being done by that arrogant , ignorant piece of shit in the oval office.

BTW, if he owes his right to free speech to anyone , it is the ACLU, it certainly is NOT being defended in Iraq where US troops have targeted journalists who dared speak the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The image they are conveying is that Bush is murdering our soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. absolutely
That's what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VTMechEngr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oops, meant to reply to him.
Hopefully he understands it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Hi mr fry!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. bzzzzt- wrong answer.
soldiers in iraq are not defending the 1st amandment.

or the constitution, or anything else lawful for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC