Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What a concept... RW pundits to rip apart a debate after the fact...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:39 PM
Original message
What a concept... RW pundits to rip apart a debate after the fact...
WTF???

This is a situation I'll never understand.

I'd type more but one of my hands is being held together by stitches at the moment, but I look forward to reading other's opinions on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I turned it off, who's ripping the debate?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. All of them
"Sharpton said that 16 schools shut down in St. Louis, but somehow that was Bush's fault?" Dems are making up this world that doesn't exist such as disenfranchising voters, a quagmire, vets can't come home to adequate health care, education, etc. (paraphrasing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I had to change the channel
that was enough Fox for me! :puke:

it was bad enough that they asked right-slanted questions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Actually, I thought many were left-slanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RealityDose Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Hmm
Did fox make up the questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dems debate....Faux decides...what else is new
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Infreakin'credible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. they won' talk about the shots on bush...his lack of leadership
they just talk about dem against dem....can it be any more phony or planned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_has_Parvo Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. How in the hell does Faux get to host OUR debates?
They are an obvious extension of the RNC--who's going to be the next moderator, Hannity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samurai_jack Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. debate
I thought there were strong performances in the debate. I think Graham had some good answers. sharpton was good too. that favorite song question was hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RealityDose Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. For the bashing
Fox was complaining that the Democrats were just bashing Bush and not giving answers. The election is in 13 months, the primaries in 6. Swarzeneggar's doing the same thing for an election in 4 weeks, has less answers than the dem candidates for president, and Fox has him on a pedestal. Swarzzie won't say where he is on the issues and they praise him like he is going to be their savior!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RealityDose Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wait it works both ways
Sure Fox is anti-democratic, but we had all 9 candidates on Fox. We have the democratic vote in 2004. There's a lot of non-democrats who probably watched tonight that we might be able to steal next Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC