Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CASE IN POINT, the CIA, George Tenet, & the fallout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:13 PM
Original message
CASE IN POINT, the CIA, George Tenet, & the fallout
The very first thing that has to be remembered is that George Tenet was a Clinton Administration appointment. In fact, he is the sole remaining Clinton Administration official still left in place by Bush. The Repubs HATED this guy back during the 90's. Do a search for Tenet+Clinton on google. There is plenty of stuff.

So, the real question is why did Bush keep him around after 9/11??? Think about it, we had just had the worst security breakdown since Pearl Harbor. The nation was in tears, and I mean everyone. Anyone remember Clinton during that Sunday mass where he was crying so badly that his eyes were red and his nose looked like he'd been doing Cocaine all night? Try to find that video, there's a man sitting behind him.... absolutely stone-faced. His name was George Tenet.

What did Tenet know about 9/11? Was it a combination of CIA & Bush error, where a deal was made to forgive and forget?

And think about this, how do you think the regular spooks in the CIA feel about being scape-goated??? Not good at all!!! They're gonna talk, hell, they're already leaking a jackload of info to the press.

Do you think Tenet doesn't know this? Basically he's taking the blame for refusing to stop the information being used in the SOTU. But, is it really his responsibility if warnings were given ahead of time? No, it is not. The SOTU is a constitutionally provided speech given by the President of the United States, once a year, and the buck really should stop at the Presidential level.

This isn't over, not by a long shot. Heads are gonna roll. And it won't just be Tenet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just a small point
"The SOTU is a constitutionally provided speech given by the President of the United States, once a year, and the buck really should stop at the Presidential level."

The president isn't required to actually give a speech, he just has to provide a written report to Congress. The speech is a fairly recent tradition. I don't remember who started it. Truman, FDR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Woodrow Wilson, 1913
George Washington decided to deliver his messages as speeches before a joint session of Congress. His successor, Thomas Jefferson, chose to send written reports. All subsequent presidents sent written messages until, during his first term, Woodrow Wilson convened Congress in 1913 to hear his address. Wilson continued to deliver his addresses in person until 1919, when he became severely ill for the rest of his second term. Harding resumed the speaking tradition. It remains today and accounts for calling these reports to Congress "addresses" rather than "messages."

http://www.janda.org/politxts/State%20of%20Union%20Addresses/preface.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't know the Repugs hated Tenet
Somewhere posted here that Tenet is a Repuke. I don't know if that's true. But I agree that there's a lot we don't know about, and he might hold the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC