Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does Josh Marshall know that we don't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
really-looney Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:08 AM
Original message
What does Josh Marshall know that we don't
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 12:15 AM by really-looney
Why does he go with the word one when referring to DWI's. Are there more? I know that the VP has multiples but what about the President? What will we tel the childrn

In our up-is-down political world, authoring memos which for the first time put the United States government on record sanctioning torture probably can't get you nixed for Attorney General. But fibbing about your role in covering up one of the president's DUIs just might. Newsweek's Isikoff is on the case.

===Josh Marshall

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
really-looney Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any thoughts for the AM crowd
Or is this like all other thread on a quick death spiral
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2.  bush has 2 DWIs.
Gonzales only helped in trying to cover up one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
really-looney Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What was the second?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 1967 I believe, and 1976 , plus 2 non-DUI arrests
I think the 1967 arrest is still being argued over; bush has only admitted publicly to the '76 arrest, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. And Cheney has 1 (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Cheney has 2 DUIs
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 06:33 PM by LynnTheDem
It was also reported the Bush running mate Dick Cheney also
had two DUI arrests from the 1960's and 1970's.

http://alcoholism.about.com/od/issues/l/aa001104a.htm

he reportedly began drinking more, leading to two DUI arrests within
a year. Determined to change his life direction, Cheney enrolled at the...

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/candidates/can_cheney-earlylife.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. What is Bu$h hiding?
Now why would George Dubya require a Texas driver's license with an entirely new number? It was obtained on March 31, 1995, as was his wife's Laura Welch Bush's. His wife and daughters didn't need new numbers, nor did his famous parents - former president and first lady, George H. and Barbara Pierce Bush - who all would seem to be at as much risk security-wise. And by the way, doesn't Texas require renewal of a driver's license every four years on one's birthday? Did George Dubya have something in his past to hide to cause him to purge the old record and number? This seems especially confusing since his birthday is July 6, 1946, but he obtained his new number on March 31, 1995 as a renewal. (More)

http://victorian.fortunecity.com/brambles/499/Bush/Hiding/hiding.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I sent this info out to every stirshit lefty media source in existance
prior to the 2000 election.

No interest.

Sounds like some investigative journalism is called for, but I'm just another rat-in-a-cage consumer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They are only interested in investigative journalism if it makes
a Dem look bad. No interest in covering the GOP at all. That's what got us into the mess we're in now-a lazy, corporate-owned media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC