Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone expect Nightline's 1/19 Vote Fraud report w/Cokie Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:29 PM
Original message
Did anyone expect Nightline's 1/19 Vote Fraud report w/Cokie Roberts
to be honest?

Sent to ABC News' Nightline
<http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/ >
on January 21,2005....


Cokie Roberts, in her remarks on Nightline's January 19 broadcast covering the allegations of vote obstruction and manipulation in the 2004 election, dismissed the complaints from numerous voters, especially from African Americans and young people in Ohio, as conspiracy theory and Internet rumor.

The same facile clichés were used in the media to deride allegations by the 9/11 families that the Bush Administration sat on evidence of an impending attack in 2001. The 9/11 Commission's investigation later showed the 9/11 families were right.

Ms. Roberts also suggested that the recount's purpose was to overturn George W. Bush's election in 2004. In fact, the recount was undertaken in order to win some urgent reforms: auditable paper
ballots for all votes cast on computers; equitable distribution of election equipment; national voting rights standards; removal of
public officials with a clear partisan bias from supervision of elections (e.g., Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, who also chaired the 2004 Bush/Cheney campaign in his state).

These reforms are necessary regardless of whether the recount in Ohio was likely to overturn the 2004 election. My vote is important even if the candidate I vote for doesn't win.

Significantly, the recount effort was launched and led by Green Party presidential candidate David Cobb while Democrats sat on their hands after John Kerry's quick concession. Greens have been campaigning for electoral reforms for years, and also call for instant runoff voting, proportional representation, and repeal of ballot access laws passed by Democrats and Republicans in order to hinder third party and independent candidates.

Contrary to the bromide that "the system works", which was repeated at the end of the January 19 Nightline broadcast, the real lesson of 2000 and 2004 is that the U.S. is still in the process of
becoming a democracy.

Scott McLarty
Media Coordinator,
Green Party of the United States
gp.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would expect Cokie to talk out of her ass
not to do any actual reporting, just parrot the D.C. elite's prevailing view on whatever subject she's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I expected that the Nightline would expose the fraud...
I expected that the Nightline coverage would spotlight the fraud and help our case.

I expected that Nightline would give new credibility to the election-fraud issue.

I expected that Nightline, since they were covering election fraud, would interview Conyers, Arnbeck and others intimately involved with the issue.

I expected Nightline to engage in legitimate journalism.


I'm losing my innocence and my belief in the media--one broadcast at a time. Sorry to say. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC