Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Church trying to come to terms with 'holy strumpets'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:51 AM
Original message
Church trying to come to terms with 'holy strumpets'

Times
By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent



THE Church of England is struggling to find a new name for the world’s oldest profession. One idea is to call prostitutes “people involved in prostitution”.
The Church is backing plans partially to decriminalise offences related to prostitution, according to a paper published yesterday by its mission division. The Church says: “Traditional terms such as ‘prostitute’ and the historical legal designation ‘common prostitute’ carry strong derogatory and stigmatising overtones.”

Alternative terms such as “sex workers” were also unacceptable because they carried an air of neutrality that could normalise activities that are not normal, the paper says.

Although not in the paper, other suggestions made by one bishop included “first professionals”, a reference to prostitution’s common designation as the world’s oldest profession, or “holy strumpets”.

The paper, already being referred to as the Church’s “missionary position”, sets out a Gladstonian drive for moral improvement to help better the lives of the nation’s prostitutes. An estimated 8,000 work in London alone.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,175-1440607,00.html

Howabout "hooker"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bronco69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
"Alternative terms such as “sex workers” were also unacceptable because they carried an air of neutrality that could normalise activities that are not normal, the paper says."

For crying out loud it's been around since the dawn of mankind. How much more "normal" can one get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, if neither neutral nor stigmatising terms are acceptable
you need something downright complimentary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Sensuality technicians"?
"Orgasm engineers"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Taking a cue from the Bu$shCo naming-committee......
"amateur virgins" -- ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why don't they take a cue from the yellow pages?
That's a company that really knows a good euphemism when they see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC