NYT article on ACT's efforts in Ohio

[bones_7672]

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/21/magazine/21OHIO.html?oref=login&pagewanted=1&oref=login

[BeFree]

1. Ya wanna know what's a pisser?

When people post a link without the four allowed paragraphs.

[rndmprsn]

2. hard to please everyone...

i've had ppl complain when i quoted too much...doh!

[BeFree]

4. The rule is

Up to 4 paragraphs from an established media organization website.

It is one: a matter of decency, and two: it allows a person to decide if it is worth it to click on the link.

Just about everybody would be happy if folks put up the 4 paragraphs. It's easy and simple... may be too simple for some to execute, eh?

[gristy]

3. dupe

please post in one forum only
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x68712

[Stand and Fight]

5. "Who Lost Ohio?"

Yeah, the first four paragraphs would be nice or a summary of the article. By the way, friends, it is about eight pages long... The title of the article is "Who Lost Ohio?"

[Stand and Fight]

6. Bosh...

The article does NOT talk about their advocacy of a recount, so don't bother reading it if that is what you're after. It's a narrative of their actions on election day and Blue Wednesday. Nothing more. Absolute fluff.