Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Insurgent or Patriot? You decide.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JaneEyrez Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:04 AM
Original message
Poll question: Insurgent or Patriot? You decide.
If our country had been invaded by a foreign force without justification and you took up arms against that force and did all you could to drive it from your country, would you consider yourself to be an insurgent or a patriot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. The insurgents are the US troops who invaded Iraq
without provocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexisfree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. sad
Edited on Mon Nov-15-04 11:43 AM by alexisfree


we can't express our feelings anymore...in this forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Is this meant to be ironic?
Just out of curiosity.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I don't think 99.5% of DU'er can share your kind of warped glee or
would even THINK of joining you in calling the poor kids sent over to execute this monstrosity of a war "murderous invaders from zob-land".

What the hell is wrong with you? Your post disgusts me almost as much as this ugly war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Trick question, because Murika isn't just any ol' country.
Murika operates by a whole different set of rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneEyrez Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It was a hypothetical...
designed to get people to think about whether it's correct to call those people insurgents just because the MSM and Chief Warmonger say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I hear you. Unfortunately there's a lot of cognitive dissonance
in America when it comes to empathizing with the plight of other nations, particularly when the plight is the result of American policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think they are just fighting for their lives. Like they did against
the first Crusaders.How could we have let this happen? First rule of combat "know your enemy". We don't even know our friends. What a bunch of fools our leaders are. Sorry, It all seems so stupid to me.
It's been handled like Kids in a playground. US against them. Even if they are EVIL DOERS. Don't we wheel and deal with them everyday? What does he really want? What do we really want? We can't let him kill anymore but there has to be a better smarter way to render him harmless. They can squelch our Dem Leaders with out much trouble why can't they know the mid-east well enough to handle this. What a bunch of numskulls. Well that's out of my system for the day. Any anyone else disappointed that we are lead by such misdirected dummies??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. depends on WHO invades and why..
North Korea (suspend disbelief for a sec) to make us a colony, then I'd be an insurgant, NATO to free us from High Mulla Delay's Theocratic Dictatorship, then I'd be a patriot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneEyrez Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hey, thanks...
for a very interesting take on the question. Kudos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yw, welcome to DU. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firebee Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is a trick question..
An insurgent is somebody who revolts against a sovereign power. A patriot is somebody who fights for "FREEDOM", not their nation. People keep getting that mixed up. The patriots didn't fight for their nation, they fought for their "FREEDOM". So... An insurgent and a patriot can go hand in hand sometimes, but what if the insurgent isn't fighting for "FREEDOM". What if the insurgent's fighting for their nation, but not fighting for the government of their nation? Well, then that person's a "REVOLUTIONARY" or somebody who believes they're fighting in the best interest of their nation, even though he's fighting his nation's government.. albeit interim or established. Well.. this could just go on and on.

Rumsfeld got me hooked on semantics. Too bad he couldn't get Bush hooked on phonics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Anybody who takes up arms on behalf of their country is a patriot
You are right. It's all about the language in which the war and it's participants are framed. I've long had a problem with the word "insurgents". The vast majority of Iraqis fighting against against the invading "coalition" are patriots who have taken up arms to defend their land, life and families. They want Iraqi's to determine the future of Iraq and find foreign armies on their soil insulting.

The vast majority of our soldiers are there doing the best they can, trying to stay alive and make the best of a truly nightmarish situation in a war their countries leaders never should have put them in. Many of them are there because they had little employment prospects and perhaps a family to feed, or needed money to pay for college. Nearly all are patriots who believe deeply in duty, honor and country.

Only a FOOL would believe that either side is populated solely by those of valor and virtue. Both sides harbor monsters. Both sides are often being manipulated by those above them whose motives are frequently much more nefarious than the intentions and the heart of the soldier on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC