Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

American Fascism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 12:47 AM
Original message
American Fascism
Back in 1944, a dude called Henry Wallace defined American fascism in an article reprinted by truthout. i think you should read it. it's as prophetic as Orwell's 1984, which was written around the same time i think...
=====
Some excerpts:
=====
The American fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate perversion of truth and fact. Their newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every crack in the common front against fascism. They use every opportunity to impugn democracy. They use isolationism as a slogan to conceal their own selfish imperialism.

SNIP

They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.

SNIP

The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.

SNIP

American fascism will not be really dangerous until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the deliberate poisoners of public information, and those who stand for the K.K.K. type of demagoguery.

READ IT AT: http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/082103F.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. this quote pinpoints 2004
"American fascism will not be really dangerous until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the deliberate poisoners of public information, and those who stand for the K.K.K. type of demagoguery."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Life imitates art
2004. A novel about the overthrow of the United States of America. West Texas businessman, George Bush, gets acquainted with politics. In his course of business and political aspirations, he meets people with fascist ideals and embraces their ideology. A coup d'etat is planned in the year 2000, and the rest, as they say, is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Challenging this glib term "fascism"
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 01:20 AM by sweetheart
If Bush wins," the US writer Barbara Probst
Solomon claimed just before the election, "fascism is possible in
the United States." Blind faith in a leader, she said, a
conservative working class and the use of fear as a political
weapon provide the necessary preconditions.
She's wrong. So is Richard Sennett, who described Bush's security
state as "soft fascism" in the Guardian last month. So is the
endless traffic on the internet.

In The Anatomy of Fascism, Robert Paxton persuasively describes it
as "... a form of political behaviour marked by obsessive
preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and
by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity". It is hard to
read Republican politics in these terms. Fascism recruited the
elite, but it did not come from the elite. It relied on hysterical
popular excitement: something which no one could accuse George Bush
of provoking.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1346632,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. We're finally there...
or mighty damn close!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC