Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have been persuaded to withhold my support from any candidate ....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 12:27 PM
Original message
I have been persuaded to withhold my support from any candidate ....
at this time. Since I do not live in NH or IA, I will not have a say about who wins those primaries. Although I have supported Dean and Kerry up to this point, I see a division that will not of benefit to me or the Party if one wins and the other loses. I have decided to wait until the field thins out after the primaries before I make my final decision.

The primary point of division seems to be the Iraqi War and security reasons, including support or non-support of the Patriot Act. This is a two-edged sword for us, in my opinion. For example, if Kerry wins, the Repubs cannot say with any credibility that the Democratic Party is "soft on terrorism". They will still say it but it will not be as credible if said against Dean, if he is the winner.

The other edge of the sword, if Dean wins, is that many Democrats do not support the war and it is the minority of our Party that supported Bush and the war and the Repubs would say that our Party is "soft on terrorism". The fact being that our Party is split on the war.

However, if Dean were nominated and he chose a pro-war person as his VP, that would diminish that charge somewhat. Vice-versa, if Kerry is the nominee and he were to choose an "anti-war" person as his VP, that might help to unite the Party in some manner. It is a dilemma for our Party. There is no easy way out. No matter who wins, a large proportion of our Party will have to vote for someone they fundamentally disagree with or they will have to vote for someone else or they can not vote at all. There are not a lot of good choices here folks. It is unfortunate that our Party was not united for or against the war, but that's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry has rushed toward an antiwar position, one Dean had from the start.
Forget how Dems voted last year: both prez and CP candidates need to be firmly antiwar NOW. If Lieberman ends up on the ticket, I will not WANT a united Democratic Party -- I will then have left and would prefer to see it in shambles. On other hand, a Dean/Kerry or Dean/Clark ticket would be quite acceptable -- and have the proper military balance, while remaining strictly antiwar re Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC