I agree there probably was fraud committed on Tues, but

[KC21304]

we are hurting our case if we are trying to prove it with incorrect information. Everyone I know in Wisconsin voted on optical scanner. So why is the graph being used to compare paper trail vs non paper trail still listing Wisconsin as a non paper trail state ?

This does not help our case. I understand the argument that the computer used to deliver optical scanner results can be hacked. But that is not the argument being used with this graph.

[riverwalker]

1. Do an analysis on Wisconsin

yourself using the numerous links and you can tell us. Who do you expect to do it, if not you, the repugs?
Find something that DOES help our case.

[KC21304]

3. I don't need to do an analysis to know that when comparing

deviation from exit polls of states with paper trail and no paper trail, you cannot put one in the wrong category just because it helps prove the point you are trying to make.

So if I am unable to find evidence of voter fraud in Wisconsin, I should be quiet about someone else's faulty data ? OKAY.

[trotsky]

2. The most glaringly inconsistent counties in FL

used optical scan.