Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Kerry concede before the provisional ballots were counted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:55 PM
Original message
Why did Kerry concede before the provisional ballots were counted?
Kerry trails in Ohio by 136,000 regular ballots.

There are 150,000-250,000 provisional ballots.

Why didn't Kerry wait for the provisional ballots to be counted before conceding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eternalburn Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Skull & Bones (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogradda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. i dont know
no idea at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. The $64,000 question
Let's ask him! Think he'll answer us? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. There weren't enough (not every provisional ballot is valid)
and, from what I hear, they weren't in the right districts.

Furthermore, as they said, they are going to continue to fight to make sure every ballot is counted.

The concession speech is meaningless, legally, and helps us in terms of PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yep. It's a PR move. The ballots still have to be counted regardless of
who concedes Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. shhhh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Really?
It's not over? If it turns out Ohio went for us, we could still win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. True.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 07:02 PM by bushbash
If, once all the ballots are counted, Kerry has a majority, he is our next President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Kerry should have fought for every voter whose
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 07:07 PM by Eric J in MN
credentials were questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayStateBoy Donating Member (562 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Provisional + Absentee + "suspicious" ballot results
There have to be a number of heavily democratic precincts that had far fewer tallies for Kerry than anticipated.

These suspicious results should be recounted if there are tangible ballots present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. secret plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. He said they looked at the numbers and figured out that there was no
way he could win. If there was a way to win, he would have fought.

You know he looked at all the calculations before he decided. He wanted to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. He owed it to us to see the process through.
We earned that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. We were behind in New Mexico and Iowa
just slightly, but we needed all three states.

Personally, I think he would have gotten most of those provisional ballots, but he would need a recount in IA and NM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. No we don't need IA or NM
Ohio gives 272
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. We didn't need NM or IA if we got OH. Kerry has 252.
Add OH's 20, and that's 272. Whoever gets 270 or more wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. You guys are right.
I need sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zwielicht Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Even without OH: NV,NM,IA were still undecided -> 269:269 !
and how many early votes and provisional ballots are still not counted in the close states?

and what about punch cards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's what I would like to know too!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. because they saw numbers that we didn't see
i wish a lot of people would shut the fuck up about "kerry being a pussy, kerry turning his back on us, letting us down"

the moral values shit killed us

fucking killed us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Thank you for that.
I've been in here slugging all day, standing up for Kerry's decision. If he had any other recourse, he would not have conceded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Really, what values?
Do you really buy that crap? Rupuks have no values, except hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. "moral values"
perception outweighs reality, whether we like it or not

i underestimated it, and it killed us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. I wouldn't second guess this decision
They have the vote tallies, provisional tallies, etc. precint by precint. I'm sure they cut the numbers a hundred different ways -- if a possible, semi-realistic win scenario was there, they wouldn't have conceded. No one wanted a John Kerry win more than -- John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because the probability of a win in Ohio
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 07:07 PM by bushbash
was very near impossible. There will be challenges to a number of those ballots and a number that will be invalid. The remainder would probably be within 100,000 and maybe 200,000. Even if you take the high estimate, he would have to be at 70% +. That's the optimistic view. More likely he would have had to win upwards of 85% of those ballots to claim the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. The binvisible fraud was unproveable
and the lost votes just lost(challenges etc). Their SOS, whom my car brakes will not work for strangely enough, was revealingly comfortable.
He's a rich man today. it ashowed they didn't ehave to work so long as the challenges were confined to limited helpless issues.

No one listened to Palast. No one backed Beverly Harris. The dems preferred the old fashioned visible stuff and couldn't even handle that.

I have no clue what Edwards is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Didn't Palast say it was the uncounted punch cards that mattered?
He mentioned something on AAR today, but I just caught it in passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because statistically speaking he didn't have it
If Ohio is split right down the middle, and there were 250,000 ballots and 10% of those are tossed out, you are left with 225,000. He could only get 1/2 of that (using the trend) which would give him 112,500 votes--not enough to win.

Why fight it and look like a sore looser and give the RW something more to focus upon.

He won the primary, he won the debates, he won everything but we were beat long before today. We were beat when our government did NOTHING about the scandal in Florida or Ohio in 2000. IT is like getting robbed and leaving your door wide open cause you think "it couldn't happen twice in a lifetime".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Provisional ballots are probably 90 percent for Kerry.
It was the Repbulicans who were challenging voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. I think so, too.
From what I'm hearing, when they're counted, then we'll really know who won. Until then, the concession is not legally binding.

Wouldn't that be a grand flip flop! In your face, DictatorTot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomNickell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. The actual number was smaller--150,000.
And, they all -will- be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Many would have been excluded. I also heard there were only136,000.
Even if he was to win 90% of 150,000 is only 135,000, and that's if none were thrown out. I am sure they looked at it every way to Sunday. He would not have conceded if there was a snowball's chance in hell he could of won. This man spent the last 2 years crisscrossing the country, sleeping in holiday Inns, riding buses, etc. He would not have given up if there was the slightest glimmer of hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. I'm trying to make sure I understand.
If, after all the ballots (provisional, absentee, etc.) are counted, Kerry really won Ohio he gets the 20 electoral votes regadless of his conssession today?

It would seem like a long shot but it would be something to get up in the morning for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC