|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:55 PM Original message |
Why did Kerry concede before the provisional ballots were counted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eternalburn (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. Skull & Bones (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogradda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. i dont know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. The $64,000 question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. There weren't enough (not every provisional ballot is valid) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushisanidiot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Yep. It's a PR move. The ballots still have to be counted regardless of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knowbody0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. shhhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Kerry should have fought for every voter whose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BayStateBoy (562 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. Provisional + Absentee + "suspicious" ballot results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knowbody0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. secret plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. He said they looked at the numbers and figured out that there was no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. He owed it to us to see the process through. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. We were behind in New Mexico and Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. No we don't need IA or NM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. We didn't need NM or IA if we got OH. Kerry has 252. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. You guys are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zwielicht (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Even without OH: NV,NM,IA were still undecided -> 269:269 ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sushi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's what I would like to know too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. because they saw numbers that we didn't see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Thank you for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Really, what values? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. "moral values" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmaier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. I wouldn't second guess this decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because the probability of a win in Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. The binvisible fraud was unproveable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
16. Didn't Palast say it was the uncounted punch cards that mattered? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsUnderstood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. Because statistically speaking he didn't have it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Provisional ballots are probably 90 percent for Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. I think so, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomNickell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. The actual number was smaller--150,000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Many would have been excluded. I also heard there were only136,000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tibbir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-03-04 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm trying to make sure I understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC