Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USSC Question: Does naming a sitting justice as Chief Justice require

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:14 PM
Original message
USSC Question: Does naming a sitting justice as Chief Justice require
Senate confirmation? (If the CJ retires or dies...I know any "new" ones must be)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it does need approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, it does
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes
I think Rhenquist was elevated from a Justice to Chief Justice under Raygun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibeMatt Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I seem to remember...
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 03:20 PM by LibeMatt
...hearings when Rehnquist was promoted.

On a mostly unrelated note, I also was reminded of Robert Anton Wilson's "The Schroedinger Cat Trilogy", in which he used various people's names as slang for words normally forbidden by the FCC (I think he did so for humorous effect, as said words are also used in the book). Rehnquist was one of these terms.

:evilgrin:

np: OM Trio--Spring Tour 2004 Highlights, V.2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the constitution covers this
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 03:25 PM by Walt Starr
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hi Walt, yes I had read that but it seems a little vague as to the process
of elevating an -existing- justice to the CJ position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. as Walt has posted, all power (authority) vests in the President to
seat individuals on the federal bench, including Associate Justices and the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

There is only one mentioned authority in the constitution and it's in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2. Inclusive within that presidential authority is the power to nominate all federal judges including the U.S. Supreme Court justices -- associate or chief justice. Together with the Senate's authority to "approve" or "disapprove" as it sees fit via the rules and procedures that the Senate promulgates u/ the "advice and consent" clause of Article II, Section 2 (including cloture, filibuster, super majority or other majority).


Article II, Section 2, Clause 2:

"He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."



.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamyrlin79 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. existing associate justice elevation requires confirmation...
I know for certain that to elevate an associate justice to chief justice requires senate confirmation. If confirmed, a new associate justice must be appointed. If not confirmed, justice remains associate justice and a new CJ must be appointed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, please see:

...Process for selecting a Chief Justice:

The Chief Justice is not selected by his or her peers, but rather is separately nominated and confirmed. In other words, if a sitting Associate Justice is nominated by the President to serve as Chief Justice, a separate nomination and confirmation proceeding takes place.


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/mentions.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Glitch erred dupe!
Edited on Mon Oct-25-04 03:57 PM by Melinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC