Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Commercial jets contain as much as 3,300 lbs. of depleted uranium

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:09 PM
Original message
Commercial jets contain as much as 3,300 lbs. of depleted uranium
Depleted Uranium Released During Canadian Plane Crash

Little-Known Use of DU in Commercial Jets Exposed

By Christopher Bollyn

The recent crash of a Boeing 747 in Halifax, Canada, raises a number of questions about the use of depleted uranium (DU) in airplanes, public health concerns and the 9-11 attacks. When a Boeing 747 crashed and burned on takeoff at Halifax International Airport in Nova Scotia, Canada, on Oct. 14, an official accident investigator said the aircraft probably contained radioactive depleted uranium.

Bill Fowler, an investigator with the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, said the plane was likely equipped with DU as counterweights in its wings and rudder.

“A 747 may contain as much as 1,500 kilograms <3,300 lbs.> of the material,” the Canadian Press reported. It took 60 firefighters and 20 trucks about three hours to control the fire. Fowler said: “there is no threat or concern” about DU exposure to those working on the wreckage.

“That’s baloney,” Marion Fulk, a retired staff scientist from Lawrence Livermore National Lab, told American Free Press. Fulk, 83, is currently researching how low-level ionizing radiation causes cancer, birth defects and a host of other health problems. Burning depleted uranium creates a “whole mess of oxides,” Fulk said, “which is what makes it so wicked biologically.”

~~~~~~~~

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/depleted_uranium.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry Bush will rush there and inhale the smoke for us
...to prove it's not poisonous.



"So I don't worry about, and people shouldn't
worry about a draft. . . I think we're in good
shape, I really do. And, if not, we'll -- I'll address
the nation
. But I don't see any need to right now."

- G. W. Bush (Source: The Whitehouse)

http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, well .. nice!!
Edited on Sat Oct-23-04 05:32 PM by tlcandie
Dunno about you, but this at the end really caused my light to blink...

<snip>
AMEC Construction Management, a subsidiary of the British engineering firm AMEC, renovated Wedge One of the Pentagon before 9-11 and cleaned it up afterward.

AMEC had also renovated Silverstein’s WTC 7, which collapsed mysteriously on 9-11, and then headed the cleanup of the WTC site afterward. The AMEC construction firm is currently in the process of closing all its offices in the United States.
<snip>

Interesting that they remodeled both buildings and now they are in a rush to move, eh? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Article Fails to Explain Why DU is Used in Airliners
It seems counterintuitive to load 3,300# of a material into an airliner for no good reason. Not disputing the story, but it seems strange that an airliner would be laden with one of the heaviest substances on earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's my question - WTF is the reason for DU? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rjnerd Donating Member (351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Counterbalances
The elevators, etc are essentially see-saws - they have a heavy weight on the other side of the pivot, so you don't have to work as hard to move them. They want the weight to be as compact as possible.

Having said that, they should just use tungsten. The density is within a few percent, and its not toxic.

-dp-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Tungsten is Expensive, But Lead is Cheap
lead is toxic, but nowhere near as bad as DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humanbeing Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Uh, no, it says very clearly...
"Bill Fowler, an investigator with the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, said the plane was likely equipped with DU as counterweights in its wings and rudder."

I dont know enough to state that DU is much better than some other heavy-but-less-toxic material like lead, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sporadicus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm Slow Some Days
Mondays, Tuesdays, etc. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC