Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

* Is At 55% In CBS Poll-I Have A Problem With Gallup

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:38 PM
Original message
* Is At 55% In CBS Poll-I Have A Problem With Gallup
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

The CBS Poll confirms the Newsweek and Zogby Poll.

Only the Gallup Poll has * at 59%


Newsweek and Zogby have * around 53%


If anybody remembers Gallup was all over the place in the final weeks and days of the 00 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who cares there just opinion polls
they mean absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They Are Snapshots of What Americans Are Thinking
or as close as we can get to a snapshot of what people are thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ok, the CBS News Poll
only 930 adults were polled, that is barely a drop in the bucket compared to the entire adult population. Polls represent the opinions of 1,000 people not the entire adult population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Those Polls Are Based On Inferential Statistics
the same as DNA.


By sampling 1,000 people with the proper controls I can infer what millions think....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. And they do a piss poor job
of using random, multistage clustering, so their results are almost always skewed toward the conservative position, because of the locations where they draw their samples from.

Gallup is particularly bad about this, which is why their polls have consistently proven the least accurate on a national level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I totallly agree!
:toast: Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. The "polls" at the end of the 2000 campaign had bush "winning"
the popular vote and the freepers planned to make sure bush was the president if he lost the electoral college and won the popular vote.

Does anyone else remember this? :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. A Couple Of Things
Edited on Sat Aug-30-03 07:33 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Polls have margins of errors and confidence levels.

Usually the confidence level is 95% . That means there is a 1 in 20 chance the results are erroneous.

And if the margin of error is three percentage points means that if * was leading Gore 45% to 42% he could actually be losing 45% to 42% or even winning 48% to 39%.

And in 00 the race was a razor close. Gore won the popular vote by less than one half percent. All pollsters will have problems in a race that close.

That being said

Gallup

Zogby

CBS News

The Harris Poll

The Washington Post

were all within 2% of predicting the winner.

The only polls that were way off were the Rasmussen and Battleground Polls. Those were the Freeper's favorite polls.

For more about inferential statistics, sampling, and polls go to

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/POLL_EXPLAINER.html

There are better sites but that's a start

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. But in all but one, the numbers are dropping
drip, drip, drip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a poll of adults, not likely voters.
I believe that Zogby and Newsweek polled likely voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I Think Gallup and Newsweek Used
registered voters


Zogby uses likely voters*


and

CBS used adults


*there are many ways to define likely voters . The best way is to ask people if they know where they go to vote and ask them where cuz most folks want to look like their civic minded and say they are going to vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dimsdale Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. It never fails to amaze me..
Edited on Sat Aug-30-03 06:50 PM by Dimsdale
that pollsters manage to locate so many idiots who think Chimpy is just wonderful. I thought it's Osama who is supposed to be living in a cave in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. :D
Thanks for making me smile. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dimsdale Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. My pleasure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. You have to wonder how many of these polls are outsourced.
Who is checking the methodology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think Gallup is full of it
I'm not sure when they changed their polling methodology but since at least 2000, their polls have been four or five points better for Bush than most other major polls. Then occasionally you'll see an "adjustment", where suddenly their numbers are in-line with everyone else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I Read An Article By The Washington Post Pollster
during the latter days of the 00 race and he said Gallup doesn't control for party and even today the Dems still have a 3-8% lead in party ID
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. If you'll look closely,
... you'll see that Gallup usually rates Commander Codpiece higher than the others.



Gallup is only exceeded by Fox (worst, of course), ABC, and CBS.

See http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/favorability.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. commander A-Wol codpiece!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nwstrn Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I've always wondered . . . . .
Looking at the chart above--Who were the people who were smart enough to give Bush a thumbs down before 9/11 but suddenly thought he was doing a great job after the event? I know--polls aren't real, rally around the flag effect, media submission--but still . . . . Bush spent 9/11 hiding out on Air Force One; he lied about the plane being targeted by terrorists and his first speech to America following the event was atrocious. All those Gore voters/Democrats immediately ran to Bush's side? I guess Tom did give him a big hug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Welcome to DU, nwstrn!
I think that's called the "mother hen" effect.

Its where, in time of danger, everybody clusters around the weak, incompetent leader, in order to protect us all in a crisis situation. You see where it wears off consistently.*


* (see also the results of the "little boy crying wolf" effect.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I was one of the 10%er club! The 10% who didn't "flock to him"..
Hard to believe there weren't more!

There's more now!

I think they let it happen on purpose which I didn't think back then but at the very least they are the worst on National Security and they should be ousted for that Alone! :grr:


Welcome to DU! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-03 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Hi nwstrn!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Nice info, thanks.
Looks to me like a classic case of the double-knee-jerk reaction.

How fitting for the sitting, clueless double-jerk. .

Now, if only the 02 NOV 04 poll will put the knee where that jerk needs it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. The truth is somewhere around 17%
the polls are a sham to keep us from an outright revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Today's Gallup is NOT the Gallup I worked for
Edited on Sat Aug-30-03 08:27 PM by Gloria
25 years ago.....back when the founder still roamed the halls at Bank St. in Princeton....and Andy Kohut, who now heads Pew, alternated the Presidency of the company with Leonard Wood. Andy was the real star and he was GOOD!! I knew who was doing the sampling and he was meticulous. We still did in person interviews and there was the rolling omnibus survey. We asked questions on things like the Presidential candidates every night by phone, week after week.

The place was cream of the crop then. It had much more of an academic leaning at that time. We did lots of social surveys as well as Presidential polling. In fact, we really didn't do any other political polling except Presidential...old man Gallup had really "invented" it way back in the 30's I think. He was the fount.

After the old man died it was OK until finally his son, now happily sitting in Hopewell doing religious polling, sold it out to a company based in Nebraska or somewhere. There are only a couple of salespeople and staff in Princeton because of the prestige address. It's all done with phone banks and I'm sure the quality can't compare to when I was there, with a bunch of oldtimers who really were proud to be with Gallup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-03 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I wouldn't be surprised if it was shopped out to the third world.
Like, what ain't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC