|
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 11:23 AM by devilgrrl
In response to the 3rd debate.
It's settled! I'm voting for Kerry to be a member of our national debating team. However, as skilled as the liberal senator from Massachusetts is at arguing for and against both sides of an issue, he should not be named captain of the team.
His woeful record during 20 years in the Senate, not sponsoring a single significant piece of legislation and not bothering to show up for three-fourths of Intelligence Committee meetings, proves that he lacks the leadership ability to be a team captain, much less president of the United States.
John F. Tintle Nipomo, Calif.
After watching three debates, my wife and I concluded that Kerry is a wonderful speaker, debater and repository of factual information. But there was something missing, something Bush possessed that Kerry lacked.
As fumbling and imperfect as Bush was at times, we were touched by his genuine humanity. When we cast our vote Nov. 2, it will not be for an empty suit filled with talking points; it will not be for a "deliberator in chief." We will cast our vote for a man who touches people with something deeper than the fluency of his words.
Scott Abramson Pamela Abramson San Mateo, Calif.
:eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
|