Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld says U.S. does not have to wait until Iraq is peaceful

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:10 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld says U.S. does not have to wait until Iraq is peaceful
Edited on Fri Sep-24-04 03:53 PM by BurtWorm
before it begins to withdraw troops?! That's what a caption of a pic with Rummy and Allawi says at NYTimes.com. Could he really have said that? Doesn't that mean the US is NOT going to see the mission to completion, as Bush kept asserting yesterday? Or have they redefined "completion?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. that fits....PNAC wants civil war since the election would not be
representative of SHia, Suni, Kurds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, ya mean Bush is gonna cut and run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That should be applauded my friend
The longer we stay, the worse it will get. I lived through Vietnam. This is the same fucking thing.

Longer we stay the more body bags. NOTHING else will be gained
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. And he has such a solid record of being right....right?
Does anyone really listen to Rummy anymore? In his speech last week, not just once but several times he referred to Saddam Hussein (he was speaking about Osama bin Laden). It's getting embarassing for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. They know that the war is their weakest spot.
Even good soldiers are speaking out against it. So the admin and its allies will say anything and maybe even do something... before the election.

But where are the troops ultimately going, I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's right. We bugged out of Nam in a hurry with guns blazing
at us in the background.

Now the sickening tide turns as democrats plead with Kerry NOT to leave poor Iraq in a mess, and stay to "fix" it.....god i hate this fucking invasion.

DON"T BE STUPID PEOPLE.

Iraq will not be occupied. It won't tolerate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. They aren't going to withdraw anybody
They have permanent bases scattered all over Iraq. They might withdraw to the bases and the oil fields and pipelines but they aren't leaving Iraq, you can bet on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That I'm sure of.
But I suspect they're trying to sucker voters into thinking Iraq won't be a problem if Bush is elected, and young voters who are concerned about the draft into thinking they don't have to rush to the polls to end the war administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's hard to tell which statements are truthful in an election year,
and it's always hard to tell with the Bush administration, but...

I think our government intends to keep US troops in Iraq permanently. I'm sure they'd love to keep them on base, and pass off all the responsibility to the local puppet regime, of course.

But they've got the two things they wanted:

1) control of Iraq's oil reserves
2) permanent US bases in Iraq

Those troops aren't going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good. It's not peaceful now. We can pull out.
I doubt that he meant it that way, but one could hope.

The "war" is lost. Time to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC