Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who's mostly to blame for Gore not being President today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lone_Wolf_Moderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:01 AM
Original message
Poll question: Who's mostly to blame for Gore not being President today?
I've lumped Bush, Katherine Harris, and the SCOTUS together as one collective agent. The last one is the obvious Freeper choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hands down the media, as I said before turn that shit off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slojim240 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. Ralph Nader.
The media is second and American illiteracy is the underpinning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. uh...the Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Also known as "SCOTUS"
SC of the US, don'tcha know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I know - I just think the SC should stand alone and take the blame
I keep getting disconnected when I try to post, so I'll try again


IMO, the Supreme Court is SOLELY responsible for the election fiasco of 2000.

It is their responsibility to uphold the laws of our land, and to be certain that civil rights to a free election are upheld. They did neither.

The judgment of the majority was to stop the recount. They should have called for a state-wide recount. They should have looked into allegations of fraud, the illegal removal of names (all proven by Greg Palast), and if necessary, called for a re-election/do-over (or Mulligan, if you prefer) for the entire state of Florida. At the very least, they should have clarified the standards for the recount, and declared that ALL CHADS (dimpled, pregnant, hanging) would be considered a vote. Double votes would be invalid.

The problem is, they didn't want to establish the standards, because that would have sent the entire nation into a spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Yeah, like who else had the power and used it?
Done in the most cowardly way, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's funny to think about this election if Gore won
who would the repubs be running? How would Gore have responded to the 9/11 attacks? Would it have united the country or divided it as bush has done? I'm going to post my own thread about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I honestly don't think 9-11 would have happened under Pres. Gore n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. More whacky votes
Bush won fair and square? I wonder if those who voted that way know that, when finally counted (was it by the LA Times?), Gore got the most votes no matter what standard was applied (Florida).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbet55 Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cheating in Florida
The exit polling clearly enabled an early announcement that Gore had won Florida. Stacks of paper ballots in Dade Co and other places were taken and repunched to reflect an overvote or illegal double vote. This is why we are a bananna republic today.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefty75 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. the public
for not protesting like crazy! We can't let something like that happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. There were protests.

But the mass media didn't cover them, and the police were prepared to brutally suppress them.

It would have taken a total revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EEgrad2003 Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. yeah
I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking that. Something this important and WE SHOULD have demanded a recount. I just wish Gore would have fought harder about the recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. You forgot: the Democratic Congress
In 1986 they made a deal with the Repugs to approve Scalia's nomination to the Supreme Court with zero nay votes. If you ask me, THAT is what cost Gore the Presidency! I wonder what the Democrats got for making that costly deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm suprised the Supreme Court isnt an option n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. SCOTUS...
SCOTUS stands for Supreme Court of the United States.

It is listed as part of choice #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. He was 'Gored' for two years by the media
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 02:16 AM by jpgray
I wish I were kidding. It's documented on the Daily Howler. For example, compare the coverage of Bush's eerie reliance on the 'I-quit-oops-now-I'm-back' Karen Hughes to that of Al Gore and Naomi Wolf.

But it's impossible to look at something so complex as a campaign and say 'yup--there's the problem'. Many or all of these were probably a factor. Except the last one. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. And he wasn't a good enough candidate to fight it back.
I picked the media, but I think many other candidates would have done better.

I think Kerry could have won pretty easily in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. People who did not vote for him.
We all knew Bush had been in Govt a few years in Texas and it was a part time job,ran the state into the red, and he never ran a business that was not bailed out by father's friend and his NG record smelled and people thought he would make a good President over a man who had spent 20 years learning something about our Govt. people wanted Bush and got him. Not that I think the SC played fair.We all know Gore would have gone after the terrorist.People do not look into what these men do and will drag into the job with them. We knew the Vice-President would sell us out to some corp. he had done that when he left the govt. the first time. It was all in front of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. The media were the fundemental problem. Right on downt
to covering up for it afterwards. The problem isnt that there are dangerous people in government, there always will be, the problem is that our system isnt working to hold them at bay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. "System"
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 11:43 AM by hiphopnation23
Which "system" are you referring to? When the system charged with dispensing justice is held hostage to corporate and political interests it makes the job of the system charged with keeping the flow of information open and objective virtually impossible. The freedom of one system begets the freedom of the other. The corruption of the former is a true death knell to democracy, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. SCOTUS, et al, but primarily Clarence Thomas

When he headed the EEOC it became completely discredited.

When he got on the Supreme Court the same thing happened.

If my job was to end terrorism, I'd just appoint Clarence Thomas to be head terrorist. Terrorism would be completely discredited within a month or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. So far, 2 freepers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. Mis-underestimated Bushco
The various fraud and prepared coup strategies of Bush Inc. are not listed here, but their most visible and audible assistance came from an ever more discredited media which lied, slanted, and went to the mat for every desire of the Bush campaign while openly hating and lying about Gore. The overall effect of nominally honest journalists is dismally incompetent, operating with full confidence under a pall of Gospel errors in getting the story wrong or simply not getting it at all- and not bothering to while Net amateurs of various persuasions run circles around them. The domination of the national forum and muddied disinformation of the people is something they themselves simply cannot take responsibility for- and a mask behind which hides an ideological enclave of very few controlling owners.

They reflect and often cheer on all that is dangerously wrong in the country. And lie with as much impunity as Bushco itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. SCOTUS
In the end, they are the ones who pulled the plug on democracy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. Clinton.
The entire ability to Gore-ize Gore came from Clinton's turning our eight years of success in the White House into a Republican punch line. It is hurting Kerry too. Nothing is going to wipe that smirk off of the Republican face until Bush seriously wrecks our country -- and he is working on that.

Clinton made the Republicans feel superior. There is nothing more crazy than a Republican who feels superior. They show every sign of letting Bush completely escape his record. Huge deficits, an unnecessary war, a bumbling, world-hated liar in office? That's nothing compared to Monica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
36. If Gore had
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 11:52 AM by hiphopnation23
the presence of mind (and was one fifth the politician Clinton was) he could have maneuvered the campaign out from under the negative aspects of "the blue dress" and used the positive things from the past 8 years (are you better off, kinda stuff) to his advantage.

It gave the republicans fodder, yes, but Gore and Company didn't recognize that early enough and nip it in the bud. Instead he distanced himself so far from Clinton and some of the positive things he could have used as return-fodder that it was sometimes hard to tell that they ever served together!

Supreme blame for 2000 gets laid at the feet of five supreme "activist" judges. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. It's Ockham's Razor
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 12:05 PM by hiphopnation23
Pure and simple! Given ALL things in the race leading up to the vote...the media...Gore's lousy campaign...The "clinton" effect....AFTER the ballots were cast it was up to the courts to, eventually the most SUPREME ONE OF THE LAND, to make sure that EVERY VOTE WAS COUNTED. They didn't do that. They are to blame.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokinomx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. He Cheated in Florida....
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 09:16 AM by Jokinomx
If Micheal Moore is correct with his facts from his book "Stupid White Men". Then..you can deduce that IF Bush hadn't cheated...He would not have won the election. It wouldn't have been close enough to worry about those issues. There would be No need for the chad controversy... No need for the absentee voters controversy, No need for Harris controversy, No need for the Supreme Court...

"IF" he hadn't cheated...but he did. His only hope in winning was to do whatever it takes to win... and he did...

So I blame * period. He is evil and should be tried for crimes against humanity.

My Humble Opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. SCOTUS, the BCE, the Mediawhores, the DLC
..in that order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. hmmmm
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 09:31 AM by Neecy
There were a lot of factors, including of course Jeb and his crooked cronies, SCOTUS, the media and Gore's ineffective legal team in Florida. Gore himself bears part of the blame - I winced when he did that macho strut over to Bush before one of the debates. If it bothered me, and I was a huge Gore supporter, it probably bothered the swing voters as well.

I put a LOT of blame, though, on the spineless Democratic leadership who stayed silent during the recount. Bush had his barracuda-like surrogates screaming lies and nonsense during this whole period, while our milktoast leadership for the most part was nowhere to be seen. It absolutely infuriated me. It gave the media the perfect opening to whine that 'it's all gone on too long, people want this over' because there wasn't any opposition to this strong-arm election theft on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. I always wondered if Warren Christopher was the best we could do.
Maybe we mistakenly believed that the truth would win out.

But, you're right. The outrage, as per: F-9/11, was that the issue of the elections was brought to congress. The house passed a resolution, BUT NOT ONE SINGLE SENATOR would support the resolution. JUST ONE VOTE FROM THE SENATE would have brought it up for debate.

Cowards, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. All of the above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. Non-voters, and Joe Lieberman (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Katherine Harris, the chimp & SCOTUS
Katherine Harris, Fucking wench that she is. :grr: Had she not purged 57,000 voters from the rolls....:grr: I HATE that strumpet! SHE should be hung by her fingernails! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartooner Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
28. ANSWER: THE SAME A$$HOLES WHO TRASHED DEAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Shocking!
I can't believe that people blame this on that easy, monolithic target "The Big Bad Media". Get off it! The blame for the debacle in 2000 can be placed squrely on the shoulders of five individuals. I think you all know who they are, but for those who don't:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. SCrOTUS!
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 11:51 AM by JVS
Basically all those who were happy not to count the votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nefarious Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Repugnant Cons had a Plan prior to the Election
It was a modern day rewrite of Jim Crow.

Culpable: Jeb Bush, Florida Dept of Law Enforcement, State Police road blocks, poorly worded/ misleading ballots, purging voters who had their voting rights restored, and 20,000+ surprise votes for Pat Buchanan in Palm Beach county, and nasty lowlife Republican operative James Baker threatening people as though they were Saddam Hussein.

Get ready for FEVFBR (Florida Electoral Votes For Bush, Regardless) Part II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. You are talking about circumstances
BEFORE the election. Once the ballots were cast and the faintist wiff of funny business was in the air, lifetime appointees to the supposed non-partisan court benches should have seen the forest for the trees and demanded every vote be counted. They didn't. They are to blame.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
41. The DLC and their insistance on mediocrity.
The pursuit of the "moderates" led him to not having a clear message and the goofy media coverage of the way he dressed and the way he spoke and the crappola about "earth tones" and "alpha-male" rubbish.

Dumbya, for all his obvious stupidity, had a clear message. Repugnant as it was, and is, it was clear. There is no doubt, except in the KKK/Nazi wing of the republican party, that Bush is a rightwing conservative.

Gore, and now Kerry, are all over the map, trying to please everybody by taking no unambiguous positions. A simple question such as, "Are you a liberal?", should be answered with a firm "yes", rather than the mumbo-jumbo, "nuanced", maybe, kinda sometimes, blather that the DLC loves.

The result is that, in the eyes of the public, Bush comes off as "decisive" and Gore and Kerry come off as "indecisive", "flip-flopping", "vague", "non-committal".

Instead of being defensive about being liberal, they should shout it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Sure those are all factors.
Larger factors that are part of the indictment of our electoral system, writ large. The race shouldn't have been as close as it was and part of the blame for that MAY belong to the DLC. But more voters cast thier ballot for Mr. Gore. There was funny business in Florida and our court system (ON UP TO THE MOST SUPREME ONE IN THE LAND) FAILED us. You and me and every single American. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Well, I agree with you.
The Electoral College was a sop given to the south who felt threatened by the more populous north and which they saw as a way to protect slavery.

It should have been abolished long ago. The election of the president should be decided by the popular vote since He/She is elected to represent all of the people and states.

But, I'll stick to my assessment of the role played by the DLC. Everyone loves to blame Nader, but those voters were available to Gore if he had moved left instead of right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. It's a big "if"
and we can "shoulda coulda woulda"'d the scenario 'till we're blue in the face. The simple fact of the matter is that all factors being what they were in the race itself, Gore won Florida by five different counting standards all of which the Supreme Clowns voted to halt.

EC? A disaster. Must go. Gore's campaign? Pretty lousy, should have worked at having his finger on the pulse of his base and not pandering to the DLC. Nader? Probably had some influence too.

But the fact of the matter is that Scalia, Rehnquist, Thomas, O'Connor and Kennedy all wanted Shrub in office. And the supreme court always gets what they wants. THAT'S what needs to be ended. 2000 is the only time in my life I've actually considered taking up arms and storming a building to oust fascists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. The supreme court is the main reason I'm voting for Kerry.
On all other issues, I see him as much better than the boobinchief, but hardly what I would consider a flaming liberal.

But, the SCOTUS appointments are damned important, and I hope that if he is elected he will put up some true liberals and not fall the "bi-partisan" bullshit that he'll be faced with from the republicans and their DLC apologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
42. Goe Did Exactly What He Needed to Win
his early campaign was lousy, but he corrected it, made all the right decisions, energized the base, and won all the swing states.

The only thing he did not take into account was the series of events in Florida. A clear majority went to the polls that day to vote for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I'm suprised that most DUers blame 2000 on
"The Media".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
45. who gives a f*&^
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 01:03 PM by mopinko
gore is not running. get your head out of your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. LOL!!
Good one. Only the most unprecedented and shocking use of judicial power in our nations history; one that had a direct affect on the outcome of a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. Yeah...who gives a fuck. Why not just say "Get over it!"? Close enough.

BTW, I would be just as shocked if the tables were turned. Five "activist judges" voted to CEASE COUNTING VOTES. Doesn't matter which party it favors, it was unprecedented and deserves scrutiny and castigation often, and harshly. Dig?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. discussing the theft of the election
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 01:22 PM by mopinko
and beating up on al gore are NOT the same thing. i don't object to talking about it, and i sure as hell am not "over it". but talking about it in this vein- who is to blame, is just plain stupid shit.
talk about how kerry can win. and what YOU are doing to make it happen. hint- this little exercise does NOT count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. I'm not beating up on Al Gore
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 01:24 PM by hiphopnation23
I am discussing the theft of the election AND who is to blame (because when you talk about "theft" SOMEONE is to blame, no?) at THE SAME TIME so please spare me your pithy lectures. THIS thread is about the 2000 election not what *I* am doing to get Kerry elected. You weighed in with "who gives a fuck". I say "I give a fuck". But I don't have to turn off all other functionalities of my brain to do everything everything I can to get Kerry elected in November. :thumbsup:

On Edit: If anything I'm DEFENDING Al Gore. Luv the guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. theft is not the question of the poll
it is who is to blame for gore not being president, the theft being only one of the options. this kind of thread is a typical example of a democratic circular firing squad, and we need to cut it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. can't argue with you there
Circular Firing Squad is a big problem.

I'm just sooooooooper touchy about 2000. I do happen to feel that blame needs to be placed for the debacle (and the ultimate election of Bush) because it was a theft and the SCOTUS are accomplices.

I've made it my personal crusade to never forget 2000 and to always lay the blame squarly at the feet of those who deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sr_pacifica Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. Hijinks in Florida
Can't be the media because he won the popular vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
47. I voted because of Gore's lousy campaign, because I well
remember watching that one debate where he kept sighing. At first I didn't know who it was, but when the camera switched to Gore, I almost croaked! I kept saying, STOP, STOP! Don'y you realize what you look like here! Between that incident, and the constant trying to change his image (and clothes) turned enough people off to throw the election so close it ended up in the SCOTUS.

Sure other things happened too, like the disenfranchisement, and the biased court, and Nader, and all the rest, but Gore caused some people to turn against him all by himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeking Serenity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm surprised no one has laid the blame on the anachronistic way. . .
the Constitution lays out how presidents are elected via the Electoral College.

Had the SCOTUS not ruled like it did, the Rpubs in the Florida Legislature would have merely selected its own electors to meet with the Electoral College in December 2000.

Don'cha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Indeed.
I'm suprised that the majority of DUers (or at least folks who have taken this poLl) think it's soley the fault of "the big bad media".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
52. Im struck by the fact that it took ALL those factors ...
plus the EC system to beat Gore.

If the media had done their job it wouldn't matter that Gore's campaign was poorly run, he would win in a walk.

If Gore's campaign had been better run, Nader would have been no factor.

If Nader hadn't run, even if the other stuff happened, Gore would still win Florida (and a few other states) handily.

Even with Nader running, if Bush and Harris and the Judicial idiots hadnt stolen Florida, Gore still wins.

Even with Bush et al stealing Florida, it wouldn't matter if we didn't have the screwy EC system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. Exactly
I remember being shocked that Gore so meekly accepted the Supreme Court decision -- a decision completely without precedent and ultimately unconstitutional. But I had already been dismayed that there seemed to be no outrage coming from the Democratic Party over the pretty obvious shenanigans that had been going on during the recount and the first reports about the disenfranchisement and harrassment of Af-Am voters.

Here the Dem Party had a candidate that had won the popular vote, the presidency of the United States was on the line, the Supreme Court issued an unprecedented decision and no fuss was being made. In retrospect now, that raises red flags for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abcdan Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
58. the people who were foolish enough...
to vote for Bush (or Nader or no one at all).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. Media - Constitutional Crisis Mode
then all the other fucks in the BFEE - starting in Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
61. The media is a what not a who
Therefor it shouldn't be an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. And wadaya know...
it's "winning" in this pole. Truly baffling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
64. None of the above
I mean, all of the above are partly responsible, but I place the most blame on the voters who didn't vote in sufficient numbers for Gore to make the Florida machinations irrelevant.

I mean, all that "I think Gore is better qualified, but Bush seems like the kind of guy I'd like to have a beer with" stuff blew my mind. There's two main things wrong with that:

(1) Bush isn't like you at all. He's an upper class toff, and he wouldn't be seen dead having a beer with you, and

(2) What the hell does the like-to-have-a-beer-with factor have to do voting for him for president? You should stick to having beers with the people you'd like to have beers with, and vote for people for president who you think would make the better president! Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Blue Knight Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
65. Where is "Far-left Liberals who voted for Nader in the first place."
That's who I place the blame on, because, had they been more loyal to Gore, President Bush would be "One-time Presidential Candidate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
66. i see we have 8 freepers on board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maleficus Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
67. I blame the Supreme Court.
It's been proven that Al Gore would be our president, if only the Supreme Court would've allowed the recounts to continue.

2000 wasn't an election. It was a selection.

:grr::grr::grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. hear hear


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
69. You left out Bob Shrum who lost his seventh race for Gore
That's 0 and 7. Tell Kerry to fire Shrum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
70. James Baker & his Hitler Youth
The brownshirts who rioted to stop the Florida recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
71. What....no 'other'?
What about the evil reptillian alien masters of Bush? Or would that fit in the first category?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
72. The elite wouldn't stand for it
Gore pulled ahead after deciding to campaign on UHC and running a populist campaign. After the SCOTUS,the Congressional Black Caucus filed a protest and not one senator came forward to help. Dem or Pub.

He pissed the DLC off with his campaign too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
73. enough with the blame game. it's al gore's own fault he's not president
and he knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
74. Gore ran a great campaign, he won against the right the Nader left, and...
the media. The democratic party in particular the senate are responsible because they did nothing to support him during the recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
75. Quite clearly it was Paraguay. Damn them!
They'll pay, ohhhhhh, will they pay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
76. His VP pick
lost him votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC