Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Typewritten letters - Proportional font - 1969 - Vietnam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:07 PM
Original message
Typewritten letters - Proportional font - 1969 - Vietnam
Here are examples of typewritten letters, using a proportionally sized font, done in Vietnam (USARV HQ at Long Binh) in 1969. These images are scanned from originals in my service folder, for which I also have carbon copy 'flimsies.' Any morans wishing to challenge this can go fuck themselves.

Now, I realize that Texas was a very backward human shit-hole of a state (where else would a slimy turd like Dubya build a pig ranch?) and Houston was a very backward city (where else would Tom Delay and Kenny Lay find enough imbecilic idiots?) ... but the outright LIES being peddled by the reichbots on this one should make a cockroach blush. Too bad these Dubya-adoring people and their brain-dead sycophants don't have the ethics of a cockroach.

Anyone who claims such typewriters were either rare or nonexistent in 1973 is unarguably a LIAR, a FOOL, or a TROLL, or all three. Honest people should not have to suffer such corrupt and imbecilic nonsense.

It's an appalling commentary on our times that such wholesale LYING is seen so ubiquitously in the mainstream. The abysmal corruption in our media, or government, and our public discourse has reached epidemic proportions - and has made our nation something to be ashamed of.







While these letters don't provide examples, these typewriters were fully able to print a superscripted 'th' 'st' and 'nd'.

(Anyone wishing to view larger images may merely substitute a '50' in place of the '25' in the file names.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DBtv Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Forgery" issue is another publican lie.
publicanism equates with pathological prevarication and psychotic willfull ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. WHAT ABOUT THE CONTENT OF HIS CHARACTER
And the LIVE PEOPLE who confirm it? Never mind all of us who have seen Film at 11. This *DimwitMilitaryDocs circus is so far over the top I cannot believe what I'm reading. His records are 404 Cannot be Found. He has been photographed sporting awards he DID NOT EARN, just as he DID NOT EARN his placement in the "Champagne Unit." Doonesbury offered 10K, now Texans for Truth have upped it to 50 to anyone who can credibly peg the *twit WHERE he was 'sposa be WHEN he was 'sposa be there. Ya know, just SHOWING UP and all. ;-)

THIS IS ABSURD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks - My Mother Typed Dissertations In The 60's - She Could Do All
this and much more!

The math dissertations were the hardest - all those formulas and such!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Well, these typewriters were ordinary (if not ubiquitous) ...
... when I worked at Fourth Army HQ at Fort Sam Houston (Texass) in 1968 and at USARV HQ at Long Binh in Vietnam in 1969. Claims to the contrary are obscenely ridiculous.

What's particularly ludicrous to me is that, as an EDP/MIS/IT person, I regarded them as a bit of a PITA. The computer printing technology I worked with at the time was exclusively based on fixed-pitch fonts. Asshats of today seem to suffer under the delusion that mainstream computer technology has always been in the forefront. That's just not true. Such computer technology had to "catch up" to this print functionality - which was no small part of the efforts of the Learning Research Group at Xerox's PARC beginning in the mid-70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks TahitiNut, I'm off to another thread where I was *asked*
to provide proof of typewriter abilities of the time, I think this qualifies nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You might also make note of the fact that the Army in Vietnam didn't ...
... have the most advanced office equipment. Not by a long sight. Not even close. We had older equipment - equipment that could be abandoned and quickly replaced if destroyed by a rocket attack (which were ordinary at the time).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. My DD 214 has two of the little 'th' thingys on it!
Circa 1971!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Show us your DD-214...and the thingys
:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I can't because Asscraft would zoom in on me!
But I am sitting here looking at it! They could do the little thingys at Ft Dix in 71!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hubie...make a copy, and then just black out the personal info
like they do at the White House:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't have a scanner!
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 01:54 PM by Hubert Flottz
I wish I did!

EDIT} "I am not a crook!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. edit...
yes you are !! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Now you really hurt my feelins!
Edit} Low Blow! :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Your local public library may have a scanner -- mind does
If you're willing to pursue this, give them a call and ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. The local library is the last place I'd go!
They'd tell Asscraft on me for sure! I'm telling you though, that whoever typed my 214, was able to do the little 'th' things! I was there when the guy typed it and I did sign it on the spot! I also remember the guy was using an electric typewriter when he typed it up! How the Hell, could I forget anything that happened to me on the happiest day of my entire damned life!(my last day in the F---ing Army)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The clerk-cowboy who did my DD214 did it in all-caps Pica.
That, of course, doesn't make it any less precious to me (even though they left off my last-awarded medal). :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. Contact Andrew Hayward at CBS
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 08:05 PM by NRK
CBS NEWS CHIEF Andrew Hayward. 212.975.7825. fax: 212.975.7429. mg3@cbsnews.com CBS SWITCHBOARD (ASK FOR NEWSROOM) 212.975.4321 fax: 212.975.1893


or a programming manager. Make some calls. Ask to have your anonymity protected. They will. Look what they've done for their source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. It was a PITA to get these letters scanned.
My scanner is dead meat. (I'll probably have to replace it.) So, I had to drive to a Kinko's and explain what I wanted. They gave me diskettes. It cost me $35. (Sheesh! For fucking reichbot morans!) When I returned home, I found I couldn't read the diskettes. (I haven't used the diskette drive for years. It needs cleaning, at the very least.) So, I called the Kinko's and the nice gal there was able to send me the files via email. What an unreal PITA to deal with the shit being flung by these sociopathic flying monkeys! These people are a waste of protoplasm - and a waste of oxygen - whose 'opinions' are worth less than farts in a stiff breeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Big Applause Tahiti...sorry you had to fork out the 35 bucks, but you made
a good point here. I can't believe all these "naysayers" and Bush Media hacks who keep saying over and over that you couldn't type a document that looked like "word" back in late sixties and early seventies.

Maybe you should send your copies around...make it worth the 35 bucks. But they really don't want proof at CNN/MSNBC/WAPO...they want to rave on to their audience who must be all under 40 who don't know that a typewriter was capable of incredible things when IBM was in it's hey day
and not some antiquated thing from a 40's movie where one sat with clickety clack keys while a carriage went back and forth.... Good God I wonder if some of these folks realized they were electric!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. *Gasp*! There's a Centered Letter Head As Well!
I thought that was almost impossible w/ a typewriter! :eyes:

Thanks TN!

"Now, I realize that Texas was a very backward human shit-hole of a state (where else would a slimy turd like Dubya build a pig ranch?) and Houston was a very backward city (where else would Tom Delay and Kenny Lay find enough imbecilic idiots?)"

That gave me a good chuckle! Thanks for the laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Did someone ACTUALLY claim...
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 01:30 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
that centered letterhead was almost impossible with a manual?!?!?!

Good gosh, that is beyond belief. My gramps's stuff from WWII has centered letterhead for heaven's sake.

Any good typist worth their salt knew the trick to correctly centering text on a manual typwritter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. I took typing in high school in 1959-60.
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 03:22 PM by TahitiNut
It was one of the first things we were taught.

When I read one of the "experts" saying that this was difficult, I damned near had a shit-hemmorhage. The abysmal idiocy of the human sewage on the reich is appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. You got that right...
I was taught that in high school!!!

It has been a while... my recollection is

center
then backspace for every two letters

Very difficult to do! /sarcasm off/

I learned that around 1970.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yup. That's it.
Challenging to those who can neither spell nor count, though. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. well, the letterhead here
is centered, but was not typed by this machine...it is a printed letterhead and then the letter is typed on it. But that is neither here nor there...a good typist can center text without too much problem. I had to do it in typing class in 9th grade.

theProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. (sigh) Try looking at the SECOND image.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. don't you roll your eyes at me! :-)
OK OK ... I was trying to help...

theProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. My comments about Texas are obviously tongue-in-cheek.
As I've noted, these typewriters were common (if not plentiful) at Fourth Army HQ at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas, where I was assigned from mid to late 1968.

Interestingly, I was there at the same time the Smirking Flyshit was training at Lackland AFB, 8 miles outside San Antonio. I may have even been getting drunk at the Hemisfair at the same time he was. (If I'd only known then what I know now!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
53. no part of a typist's training is to center things
You find the middle of the page and backspace one backspace for every two letters.

It was quite the task but it worked.

No one knows how to do any of this anymore for it seems to be a lost art. *sigh* All that work for nothing it seems.

Signed baldearg, An aging never appreciated "secretary" *ugh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for posting these
I find the repuke attacks on these documents to be especially repugnant because they are attempting (in a very Stalin-esque way) to rewrite history and deny the memories of tens of thousands (if not millions) of people who actually lived and worked with this technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Quick! let me recreate it in Word....
Funky font too for '69 (Copperplate like).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Have you sent this to CBS/Rather?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Yes. I doubt they really need these examples, though.
The bullshit disinformation is being thrown by the flying monkeys to keep the hoi polloi busy and focused on irrelevant crap instead of the criminal behavior of their brain-damaged icon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. I THOUGHT I recalled Rather saying they had an authenticated doc.
from the military, other than the ones in question, that DID have the same kind of type (incl. the small "th" I think).

If this is true, BOY are some faces going to be red in a day or two, when CBS points this out.

I THOUGHT I remembered Rather saying that IBM had confirmed it had had proportional or whatever type available since years before 1969, although it was a high end thingie. And I thought Rather went on to state that they in fact had at least one other military document that is for sure authenticated that in fact is of the same type as these that others are questioning.

This is turning out to be an interesting story. I don't think it matters if the docs are fake, except it'll hurt Rather's reputation, so for that reason, I'm hoping the docs are not forgeries. This looks promising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Proportional spacing in Texas....
It was available on IBM Executive typewriters that I personally used in a no-frills office in beautiful downtown Houston Other sources indicate that typewriter was invented many years previously.

And a couple of years later, on an IBM Selectric Composer--also used personally by me had proportional spacing. Actually, I'm not sure when that beast was invented. But I used it then.

Damn, all this talk about obsolete technology has been giving me a flashback. Not the sort I expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I remember at the time that lots of people didn't want to bother ...
... with the IBM Executive (originally marketed as the IBM Electronic, iirc). It was not an interchangeable font (that came later with the Selectric), so what you bought was what you got. Most 'production' typing was already very well adapted to fixed-pitch typewriter fonts, especially forms.

So, IBM (a marketing powerhouse) called it the "Executive."

At that point, managers who didn't want to be viewed as typists became a market. After all, didn't they want to be an "Executive"?

Wherever I saw these typewriters, it was in a commander's office or next to an officer's desk.

At the time, I thought it was funny.


The problem getting managers to have keyboards on their desks lasted well into the 80s as office automation was being evangelized. I suppose it's hard for the still-wet-behind-the-ears crowd to realize there was once a world without PCs everywhere, but these were the realities not so long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Do I believe they're forgeries? Let's just say, "Not yet"
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 02:53 PM by rocknation
The so-called experts said THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY that the documents could have been typed. Within twenty-four hours, that was proven to be completely untrue. Why in the world should I take any further stock in their "expertise"?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Maybe it would be interesting
to get one of the 'experts' over here to see what he says about his assertion that there's no way these documents could have been typed in the early 1970s? Maybe that Joseph Newcomer dude?

http://www.flounder.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. Kick for the "proportional font" which no one seems to want to discuss.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. thanks, tahiti nut...for the information and the laugh
i think they must think we're stoopid :7
i used a typewriter in the early 70's...
i could center text on it and everything...
maybe it had proportional spacing even...
:shrug: perhaps the republicans don't know this because they never had to type anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. Nice!!!
one would be inclined to suspect these of being fake because of the unusual typeface.

However, once again, we can see the roving baseline - i.e. the "a" in recommendation is struck higher than the baseline.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Well, if you look closely at the 50% version, you can see a corrected typo
... or two. The advantages of a 1st generation high-res scan are obvious. Just as obvious is how one could make 9th generation copies and eradicate many of the clearer indications ... like the white spot near the center of the period. :shrug:

The visible characteristics of a typewriter and platen are very evident on the CBS memos still, even after the mutilations of copying and image reproduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
42. Great post
Thanks. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
43. Thanks Tahitinut
Nothing would be better than those memos to be real. The Neocons have invested their whole strategy in discrediting them. Of course if they were some type of rewrite or whatever, the content remains true.

I learned centering in 1976
Still had some old manuals too
Dam, I hope this centers

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. 1941-1972 IBM Electromatic & Executive had proportional fonts.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/IBM-Executive-series-typewriter

It had a whopping four spacings for electric typewriting with typesetting quality so good even the boss would want one on his desk -- and so IBM could sell twice as many.

A picture of its proportional type:


...good ole google...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yes, the pitch variability was merely FOUR differing widths ...
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 03:05 PM by TahitiNut
... on the font technology employed by the IBM Executive (and equivalent) typewriters.

Anyone who cares to examine the Killian memos released by CBS should note that, due to the granularity of the image, characters occupy font cells that're 16 pixels high and either 6, 8, 10, or 12 pixels wide. Quelle surprise! :eyes:

Besides the giveaway of a variance in the baseline of the characters, the Killian font shows no indication of having a variable stroke width, instead it shows the relatively uniform stroke width typical of a typewriter. (A close examination of the documents I've provided will show a very slight variance in stroke width, so slight that reduction, reproduction, and pixellation at low resolution would show none.) In particular, the blunt-ended serifs are a giveaway that they're typewritten. (Even daisy-wheels had more pointed serifs.)

I think what's particularly amusing about the Wordspiracy Delusionists is the complete and total abdication of any conjecture/allegation regarding the actual mechanical printing of any purportedly fraudulent Word output. It's really ludicrous to play stupid parlor games with screen images and ignore the actual production of a hard-copy document. Unless and until someone offers a "theory" regarding the printing step, delusive and specious allegations regarding the composition process (whether human or software) is totally and completely immaterial! Was it supposedly a daisy-wheel printer? a laser printer? a dot-matrix printer? an ink-jet printer? Which was it? (Assholes!)

I'm old enough to remember early (experimental) computer output interfaces to typewriters - one of which actually fit over a keyboard and struck the keys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. and furthermore ...
Edited on Sun Sep-19-04 12:37 AM by baldearg
I was employed as an Executive Secretary for the DoD (and other gov't agencies) around this time.

The expert on the typewriters knew how to make a superscript and subscript with a skilled hand movement. As for spacing, there was a trick to that too and it was easy enough to do once you mastered this art and skill (and believe me, there was an real skill to it).

So even if subscript and superscript did not techinically exist as a keyboard "option" (without the aid of the trained eye and hand), they most certainly DID exist. I was good at it, very good.

I find this whole argument to be stupid as hell being I know the reality of it (been there and done that).

Those old IBM Selectric's came out around 1974 or so and they were great machines and assisted the skilled typist greatly being they had that excellent correction feature at long last.

:dem: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironflange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. I don't think anyone has said this yet
Even though it was 35 years ago, congratulations on the really nice commendation!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Thank you, ironflange. Now that you mention it, ...
... I left off the second page of the second memo. It's where Major Troy became more effusive -- so I thought discretion might be mistaken for modesty. I particularly liked the "absolute trust" line. The feeling was reciprocal. Needless to say, we all worked very well together under some often-terrifying (for us, at least) conditions. I guess when you piss your pants while under fire along with other guys, it carries over into the office.
:evilgrin:

I suppose it deserves some attention here, though. There've been some inferences that draftees aren't as effective or as much of a "good soldier" as the career military. From personal experience, I reject that specious notion fully and absolutely. While I might like to egotistically think I was exceptional, in honesty I don't think I was. I know that I trusted my life to other guys - many of whom were draftees as I was. We poked some fun at the RA's (Regular Army) and they returned it - but there was never any question of trust or confidence. None. To even suggest such a thing, in some corrupt attempt to divide the past as people are divided now, is repulsive to me. I think the "Swiftboat Liars" are scum. They've betrayed the trust of a fraternity of men who had absolute trust in one another. That's beneath contempt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
48. C;mon Dan: "Here at CBS we've been inuundated with Viet Nam era letters
from the military which display the identical techniques that critics of the Killian documents say were impossible back then. We've verified hundreds of these documents as authentic. And guess what, We've been able to recreate every one of them in Microsoft Word.

In fact, one of the great things about Microsoft word is that you can recreate almost any document. Here we've recreated a page from teh 1876 edition of the Farmer's Alamanac."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A_Possum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. Another interesting thing to note here
the typist didn't put his/her initials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. We typed stuff ourselves, even Major Troy.
Even the company clerk didn't do much menial dictation/typing for the Company CO. What he did was part of his own workload; the Captain did his own, too.

As I recall, the IBM Executive was on a roll-around typewriter stand, just like other typewriters. Roll it over. Plug it in. Type. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC