"Illegal weapons of mass destruction have not only been found in
Iraq but have been used against Iraqis and have even killed US
troops.
"But Washington and its allies have tried to cover up this outrage
because the chief culprit is the US itself, argue American and other
experts trying to expose what they say is a war crime."
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B2E2DF9B-1E0C-43F4-BBF6-074C1367E27C.htmI know this has been raised on DU before, and some don't believe
that depleted uranium is the cause of birth defects - I have no
scientific knowledge myself, but I've read much about D.U. -
not least from Veterans' groups in the U.S., and if the horrific
cancers and birth defects aren't caused by depleted uranium, they're
sure caused by something out of the ordinary, and it's connected
with the two wars against Iraq.
Viewing photos of some of the horrific birth defects of Iraqi babies
was one of the major reasons why I was against the current war.
Even if Saddam had possessed WMD, I couldn't see the point in adding
to the problem by releasing more of our own. Nothing can justify
this assault against the most innocent; it's heartbreaking to
imagine what the mothers have gone through.
If Saddam's supposed possession of WMD was a good enough reason
to invade Iraq, then surely the US/UK deployment of depleted
uranium is a good enough reason to charge Bush and Blair with war
crimes.