Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Bush's intention to liberate Iraq, or turn Iraq into a battlefield?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:39 AM
Original message
Was Bush's intention to liberate Iraq, or turn Iraq into a battlefield?
The favorite Bush line today is "It is better to fight terrorism over there than over here". I have to wonder how the Iraqis feel about that. I thought the line was we were there to "liberate" them. Not turn their cities into terrorist battlefields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. it was to liberate
the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokinomx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I second that !! Liberate the Oil... he doesn't care about ANYTHING else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. No oil is a bonus..the true motivation is as it has always been
War Profiteering. Halliburton and Carlyle are making billions if not trillions off war. They control the Defense Industry. They have to shoot off their toys every so often so they can build new ones. As long as the Republicans have control there will be war. They firmly believe that War is Profitable and is the Republican Party for anything other than Profit? Money and Power are the only Gods they truly believe in. God is for the little people who have nothing else. They are masters of exploitation and God is not left out. Only Americans think this is about Religion. No Arab I have ever listened to has mentioned Religion at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Profiteering is evil
We need to be a society. Caring for ourselves and each other. Helping ourselves and each other. To survive and flourish and to share. Not to put one another at each others' throats so that one can make more money than the other.

God never made money. Man did. And the evils that can come from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quetzal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. If you ask Bush
the answer is both + 20 other rationales.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush has instructions, not objectives
The real question is what did the cabal behind Bush want, and it is clear from their own publications in PNAC that they want control of a country in the Middle East from which to project American force and influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slojim240 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Republicans need a "war" somewhere to hold on to their base.
If there isn't one already, they will see to it that we cause a conflict somewhere. They know the fear and warmongering are the only things that really can ralley their base and keep it in tack. When it comes to human suffering abroad and at home, they are in the forefront.

The problem is, they have been able to get their base to believe that by starting wars and conflicts, they are keeping them safe despite the fact that the wars kill off our own children, make permanent mental and physical patients out of 1/3 of our able bodied men and result in the incarceration and disenfranchisement of another 25% of them when they return home to no jobs and families robbed of their income.

They are really happy that the education system in this country has failed so miserable to produce a population capable of critical thinking. It makes for cheap labor, a solid voting base, and a population poweless to do anything about their own plight yet deceived into thinking that they are free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You speak the truth, slojim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush's only personal intention was to get re-elected
That's ALL he has ever cared about.

Now, some of his advisors -- ie., the ones who put the ideas in his head -- may have had further objectives going into Iraq, but it's obvious they weren't competent enough to carry them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. that bad bad man tried to kill your daddy cheney said to chimpy.
a total personal vendetta thing, a business deal gone south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Also killing Arabs is sport ...
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 09:03 AM by HamdenRice
for both Christo-fascist crusaders and Zionist Israel-firsters in the Dept of Defense. If you look at the Bush admin's pre 9/11 policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it seems clear that there was some constituence within the admin that thought that killing Arabs was somehow in and of itself a good policy. They had internalized Sharon's lifelong policy that killing and humiliating Arabs would eventually cause them to capitulate in complete surrender to Israel. This is not my conspiracy theory; it's the view of much of the Israeli center-left, as represented by analyses in Ha'aretz. The zionists in DOD basically adopted this view. "Shock and awe" was just the Americanization of Sharonist policies toward Arabs in general.

Call it the "west bankization" of the middle east as deliberate policy.

This rationale is slightly different from the Christian fundamentalists around Bush, who actually want to provoke WWIV so that Jesus will touch down in Jerusalem. A new pro-Bush biography actually argues that despite his public stances, Bush really does see the Iraq war as a crusade.

BTW, here in NYC, I've met more than a few life long Democrats who will vote for Bush as a result of 9/11, just because he is likely to kill Arabs -- the nuke Mecca vote, you could call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. buying time....that's entire purpose
bushinc is overthrowing the legal government of most powerful political entity ever seen, and they know it only takes one series of tough, honest men to derail their entire scheme. No one knows better then they of the quality of mercy of the USA to its perceived enemies; countless mommies and lil babies were buried alive in service of the idea : don't fuk with usa! USA spend 1/2 of humanity's $1.4 trillion military budget, on itself...so bushinc has some idea how precious the US is to the american people.....yet, bushinc, aided by 'mad as hell, we won't take it no mo!' mass media, which REALLY hates the idea of common good including common (ie nonwhite) people! They grabbed the brass ring dec 12th/00 by putting a joker like geebush into white house. The scam had a flaw however: the numbers of the 2k election prove that bush never won, never even came close, lie as they might nevertheless... The machinery and the mathametics would eventually expose bushinc for the thieves they were, and thus the PNAC plans were fast tracked, beginning with the events of 911. It's highly unlikely that the busheviks realized the extent of the horror that we saw unfold....i would betcha several of them cowards crapped themselves when they saw it really going down; bush probably hyperventilated, the hangman literally was in the next room! So the busheviks, and that by then included the majority of the establishment media, set out to BUY TIME. Time weighed so heavy, they needed things to happen, one right after another, and the media needed to fill airtime with all this, to, in effect, entertain the people relentlessly while TIME went by, evidence was buried, loose strings cut off and so on...only hours after the towers fell, cnn announced that osama did it (the dirty rotten bastard)... and after all, 'they' had tried before, remember the african embassies etc? There was therefore a very real anti western islamic movement out there which hated liberality, which bushinc's more extreme backers hated too, to utilize! osama was PERFECT for blame...and (with eye on filling up fox/cnn/etc hours) there were so many opportunities to exploit. The NORC results (a mainstream newspaper study of election result numbers, which were due to publish in sept/01) needed to be taken care of....voila flight 587 falls apart in the air and crashes killing nearly 300 dominican republicans! lol. That occured the morning the NORC results were published....and thanks to the crash, the NORC results were put WAY BACK on page 10 or so....haha. The washington sniper? well boy did that boy ever filler up airtime! Anthrax? same thing...plus gave nazipoo central a chance to frighten some girlie men too! Afghanistan? why our friends the taliban need to be replaced anyway chuckle chuckle) NOT!!! Iraq? Why that's a whole NEW STORY series! months and months of fillerd airtime! (mygod dick, it's working so good, maybe we can start rounding the american people up!)
Why not?
chuckle chuckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC