Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if Arnold ran as a Democrat? As an Independent?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:00 PM
Original message
What if Arnold ran as a Democrat? As an Independent?
Just curious -- what do you think would have happened if Arnold had gotten into the race as a Democrat rather than as a Republican? His wife's a Democrat. He's always been to the left of the Republican mainstream on social issues. And he even opposed the impeachment of Clinton. Perhaps Schwarzenegger's biggest strategic blunder was that he didn't use the recall as an opportunity to break with the Republican Party. The fact is, the Republican activists don't trust him, but large numbers of Democrats won't vote for him either because he's running as a Republican.

Or perhaps he should have pulled a Jesse Ventura and ran as an independent. He could have attacked both Davis AND the Republicans behind the recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only thing non-Democrat about him is that is he fiscally
conservative - I would bet money that he will switch parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. repubs are NOT fiscally conservative

I don't see anything, anywhere that shows me repubs are fiscally conservative. They love to transfer our tax dollars to others.
It's just a matter of who the "others" are, halliburton, dyncorp, etc.

In fact Clinton and Gore were way more fiscally conservative than the current crop of thieves in the white house.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. But liberal and Democratic programs such as aid to the less-advantaged....
(poor, elderly, unemployed, disabled, etc) need to be funded. If they are not funded they don't exist. If he doesn't fund these programs, I would not consider him liberal or moderate.

This is comparable to the republicans bankrupting the federal government with their tax breaks to the wealthy, in addition to their adventure in Iraq. There won't be money to fund programs to benefit the less-abled that are approved even in future.

To simply be pro-choice, pro-gay, and pro-other things that don't cost the government anything, isn't enough to consider someone liberal or Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. he's a tool

The fact that he didn't run as an independent ought to tell you somehting. If he gets into that office he'll turn the whole thing
over to the rovian operatives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. NTFW Party.
No Trousers For Women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think so...there is so much trash in his
background...the repugs would have a field day. Only repugs can get away with tarnish backgrounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not interested
he can only half act - I just watch his movies to laugh at him. No way, not him. Paul Newman or Robert Redford, maybe, but not him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is a joke and makes a joke of dedicated candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll be honest
I just don't get the deal with Arnie. Warren Buffet seems impressed by his intelligence, so I don't think he's just a big dumb jock. On the other hand if his stances are so liberal why is he always so damn chummy with the Bushes and other pugs? Is it just that they spent more quality time giving him telaflora bouquets and long french kisses? I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Has he any experience?

No.

He's running solely as an icon; a vague and empty image of supposed competence, as per his film roles.

I wouldn't vote for ANYONE without experience. I'm sick and tired of candidates being nothing more than groomed images devoid of ability.

F*ck that.

I want a capable administrator and I don't give a sh*t what they look like or how they talk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think he would have been better off...

He should have run as an Independent. Ahhhnold is far too liberal for California's rock-ribbed GOP base. 1/3 of them will vote for McClintoch or whoever, 1/3 will vote for Uberroth and 1/3 will vote for Ahhnold while holding their nose.

This election proves that the GOP want to win so bad in CA, that they will run a Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. A Democrat? We'd be all over him like a cheap suit!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. A Democrat?
then he'd be a philanderer,as a Repug, however,he's a red blooded American man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Quite frankly
I'd be embarrassed.

I'd ask the party faithful to quietly ask him not to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ariana Huffington already owns that space:
running as an independent, opposing the recall, speaking out strongly against Issa and company.

Arnold IS a Republican, that's why he's running as one. Sure, the religious right hates him, just as they do other moderate Republicans. At least Arnold is more-honest than Joe Lieberman -- Arnold runs as a Republican, not a DINO.

But, hey, what if Lieberman were to run as a Republican, entering GOP primaries to oppose Dubya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. as usual I ask this question
Name one, just one, of the close to 400 elected and appointed Republicans at the federal level who have Lieberman's record on ALL of the following:

women's rights, gay rights, civil rights, the enviroment, and rejecting Bush appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. I Kind of Like Arnold
and DU attitudes certainly would have been different if he were running as a Democrat. Like everyone else, he has a perfect right to run even if he is just trading on his celebrity.

Having said that, I thought Arnold's speech flanked with George Schultz and Warren Buffett made him look like he was over his head. In the middle of a crisis, saying "nobody understands the numbers" and "I will appoint a commission" just doesn't cut it. Nor does complaining about being taxed all day long and promising to constitutionally limit spending. It was not a speech from someone likely to solve the budget crisis.

Bustamente, on the other hand, hit a home run the day before despite being a little stiff. He obviously knows what he wants to do and can spell out in detail not only where he will change taxes and spending, but how he will get it past a recalcitrant legislature.

Bustamente did so well IMO that he might hand the election to Davis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. George Schultz.
Is Arnold a Reagan democrat? I mean, a Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. He could be doing Democrats a favor
...by running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, he'd still be an idiot but he'd be our idiot
Thank god he's a rethug. And by the way, he's going to get soundly whipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Hope so.
"What you talkin 'bout Willis."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. If arnold ran as a dem DU would declare him God
I know you guys wont agree but its ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Until he comes across as an intelligent person who really cares
It doesn't matter what party he picks to place himself in. I would like to know one thing he has said that would make anyone want to vote for him. It isn't enough for him just to be famous. He needs to represent something, anything. What does he represent? What changes does he suggest for California? Doesn't anyone care if he is up to the job or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. His father's Nazi past would be a big negative on freerepublic.com
And spun here as an attempt by the right to slam him through guilt by association.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. he'd still suck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC