Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Progressive Review on Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:04 PM
Original message
Progressive Review on Clark
Apparently, Clark has an arrogance problem. His suboordinates call him the "Supreme Being."

http://prorev.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the Progressive Review
I remember when it specialized in "Bill Clinton was bringing cocaine in through Mena and having his enemies whacked."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know...
but generally, when people are arrogant and they are criticized they get angry. I saw Clark on Fox News a while ago, and he was criticized extensively because Clinton had talked about weapons of mass destruction. I noticed that he remained perfectly calm as he responded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Umm, to run for President of the United States and Leader
of the Free World, you might need to be self-assured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. My dad used to be stationed at the headquarters building at EUCOM...
...while Clark was CINC EUCOM. It was well known that Clark's subordinates couldn't stand him. I think he was perceived as being too political, too image-conscious, that sort of thing.

If I recall, the story was that they really disliked his predecessor, George Joulwan, but as soon as Clark took over, they wished they had Joulwan back.

I am studiously neutral on Clark's candidacy, so no flaming. Just stating what I remember from hearing officers bitch about Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I Like George Joulwan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What did you like about him?
I'm pretty sure he's a big Republican. The story goes that he became a 4-star because he saved Alexander Haig's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I Don't Know His Party ID
but I have seen him several times on CNN and he seemed very centered.....


I don't like Alexander Haig because he doesn't seem very centered....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know, this petty name calling amazes me.
What amazes me even more is that it's news and is repeated in press, etc.

"Perfume Prince", "Supreme Being", whatever. That is so high school. Did he get the job done or not?

And there is NO WAY you can convince me that Clark would be the only candidate who is a little headstrong, image conscious, and bossy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Right
Why do people continually bash other people's candidates instead of building up their own....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Not even that...
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 01:22 PM by tjdee
I'm fine with most people talking bunk, but I mean--

If I heard that the House speaker in VT called Dean "Thick-Necked Jerk", would I be seeing that quoted as newsworthy? Would I be reading that at DU as a valid criticism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I Try Not To Bash Other Posters Or Other Candidates
but sometimes it's hard to restraint myself.


I certainly won't start any whipping post threads.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. every candidate for this job should expect to have his record scrutinized
... that includes Clark. however, Clark is unique in having spent his entire career in an institution that is largely insulated from civilian review, and where insider criticism of higher-ups is a punishable offense. Clark has no political track record. all we the public have to go on is his very heavily filtered military record, plus the kind of off-the-record complaints cited above. since the info about this candidate is so limited, it's no wonder his handlers are trying to sell him as some kind of saint.

i think the Clark-worshipping here is sickening. i'd no more vote for a "democrat" who refuses to declare his party, than i would vote for a candidate who refused to declare his nationality. if he's not proud to be a democrat, then what business does he have asking the dem party to bet EVERYTHING on him (a man with NO track record in electoral politics). suppose Hatch's proposed amendment was passed, and foreign-born people could run for president. would you vote for a candidate who refused to say whether he considered himself an American? i sure hope not. anyone who wants to lead this country should be proud to SHOUT that he's an American. the same goes for the dem party. if he wants to become the standard bearer of the democratic party, then Clark should be SHOUTING that he's proud to be a democrat (yes, like Dean), instead of speaking in riddles.

and yes, imho Clark's behavior to the contrary bespeaks an extreme and repulsive arrogance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC