Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Rohrabacher flip-flops on stem cell research

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:33 PM
Original message
Dana Rohrabacher flip-flops on stem cell research
Did anyone catch the comment on Real Time with Bill Maher about Dana Rohrabacher's wife recently giving birth to triplets?

When I hear triplets, I think in-vitro fertilization and all those unused frozen embryos.

Congratulations to representative Dana Rohrabacher, 56, and his wife Rhonda, 34, who gave birth to triplets last month. As we tend to suspect when a couple has triplets, the new parents used the services of a fertility clinic. Modern in-vitro techniques generally involve creating multiple embryos in the laboratory, transferring two or three and hoping that at least one will make it through to birth. Often it doesn't work. Sometimes it works unexpectedly well. Successful or not, the process creates many more embryos than babies. There is a built-in presumption * really, an intention * that even most of the transferred embryos will die. As for embryos that aren't transferred, they get destroyed or frozen indefinitely * unless, that is, they are used for stem-cell research.

So it's interesting that Rohrabacher has changed his position on the medical use of embryonic stem cells. The California Republican was a supporter of President Bush's three-year-old policy severely restricting government-funded stem-cell research. But he signed a recent letter to Bush from 206 members of Congress urging the President to reconsider that policy. Bush says he won't reconsider.

"Embryonic stem-cell studies are controversial because they involve the destruction of human embryos," the New York Times explained in a May 6 article reporting on the shifting politics of stem-cell research. (For example, Nancy Reagan, whose husband has Alzheimer's, has gone public with her opposition to the Bush restrictions.) But that can't be right. Fertility clinics destroy far more human embryos than stem-cell research ever would, yet they are not controversial. Death or deep freeze is the fate of any embryo spared by the Bush policy from the indignity of contributing to medical progress.



http://www.camradvocacy.org/fastaction/news.asp?id=926
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ewwwww, he's 22 years older than she is?
What, weren't there any Repukes his age he could con into marrying him? Typical icky old white Repuke with a trophy wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-27-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's his second marriage
They are both surfers. Dana Rohrabacher, surfer dude? Now that is a sight I would prefer to pass on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-28-04 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Mitch McConnell married a younger chick, too
Elaine Chao. Funny how these old coots choose young girls once their first wives die or they trade them in for a new model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC