A tally of US taxpayers' tab for Iraq
<snip>
That works out to $281 per man, woman, and child in this country. This sum doesn't include the extra gasoline and other fuel costs, nor Afghanistan.
Most experts expect the occupation costs to continue indefinitely.
"Two, three, maybe five years," suggests Gordon Adams, an economist at George Washington University and veteran specialist in military-cost issues. A rapid return of the American troops is "just not viable."
Though wanting to keep firm control of Iraq policy for itself and, to some degree, Britain, the US would like to involve troops from other nations in the occupation and reconstruction so it can relieve more of its 139,000 troops currently in Iraq and share costs. But key possible providers of troops, such as India, France, and Germany, won't participate unless the United Nations is given a greater role.
"The Europeans are not interested in sponsoring a US occupation, even in the name of reconstruction," says Christopher Hellman, an analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non- Proliferation in Washington.
Adds Mr. Adams: "The consequences of not going for that
is that we pay the bill. The Bush administration is bound and determined to shoot itself in the foot at the cost of American taxpayers."
<snip>
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0825/p16s01-coop.html