Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush is flogging Star Wars again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:29 PM
Original message
Bush is flogging Star Wars again
Lest anyone forget, missile defense, not terrorism, was Bushco's national defense priority upon assuming office.

And again, lest anyone forget, a missile defense shield would have done absolutely nothing to protect us on 9/11.

Missile defense is a multibillion dollar fraud that has only worked when the tests were rigged.


Bush Criticizes Missile Shield Opponents

27 minutes ago

By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

RIDLEY PARK, Pa. - President Bush (news - web sites) promoted his administration's plans to build an anti-missile system Tuesday, suggesting that the program's opponents are jeopardizing the country's safety.

Bush did not refer specifically to Democratic rival John Kerry (news - web sites), who has indicated he would rein in spending on the project.


"I think those who oppose this ballistic missile system don't understand the threats of the 21st century," the president told applauding workers at defense contractor Boeing in Pennsylvania, a crucial state in Bush's bid for re-election.


"We say to those tyrants who believe they can blackmail America and the free world: 'You fire, we're going to shoot it down,'" Bush said.

<snip>

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040817/ap_on_el_pr/bush_11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'You fire, we're going to shoot it down,'" Bush said. He forgot to add
"15% of the time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He also forgot to add
"As long as those tyrants are nice enough to put a tracking device on it like we did in our tests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaolinmonkey Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. We couldn't even get F-16s off the ground on 9/11, but we're going to
deploy this disaster of a weapons system. Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb. Did I mention dumb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:38 PM
Original message
You beat me to it.
BTW who gets to make the call re: using star wars to stop an incoming missile? What if Georgie is still trying to get through My Pet Goat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. AND as long as those tyrants don't use a passenger plane or a
suitcase bomb or a truckload of fertilizer or a letter filled with anthrax spores or a truck/car/boat/bicycle/briefcase/shoe/donkey cart/suicide bomber bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, that worked like a charm on 9-11, didn't it, Shrubbie? Who is it
that "doesn't understand the threats of the 20th century?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. You're witnessing what happens when you do drugs for 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Not to mention alcohol and hanging out in Tijuana whorehouses
contracting STDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, bring it on North Korea!
Beautiful George. Why don't you just shut the hell up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. What a total waste
We can't even adequately stop a $50 RPG round moving at 100 mph pointed at HMMWV and these jokers think we can stop a 25K mph missile with various decoy options.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. This is just a handout to defense contractors and a neocon pipe dream
Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The problem with the "Missile Defense Shield"
Is that there is no data showing that is could reliably or effectively shoot down incoming ICBMs.

The tests for Missile Defense were rigged. All of the dummy missiles were carrying tracking devices.

A senior engineer on the project, Dr. Nina Schwartz, was fired for blowing the whistle on faked test data.

As it stands now, Missile Defense is nothing but a subsidy to the arms industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. The Problem Is
This missile defense system is like a sign that reads "Beware of Dog",
only you don't have a dog. You just hope that the person breaking in thinks you have a dog.

There is no such thing as 100% security or protection, hell even the birth control pill isn't 100%. The only way to stop this country froim being attacked is to wipe out every other country on the face of the earth, and while I know that is not an option I would want, I'm not sure about you.

We found out on 9/11 that there is no way of preventing this country from being attacked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. God help us if he says "Bring it on"
I heard some dumbass talking about Iran's nukes reaching the US using this assbackward logic: The rockets only have an 800 mile radius, but if they cut the payloads they could reach the United States. Well, okay, it is rocket science, but anyone with half a brain realizes what bullshit that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Get a brain, Moran!
Edited on Tue Aug-17-04 03:41 PM by swag
"You fire, we're going to shoot it down,'" Bush said.

Many test ABM missiles haven't been able to find decoyless targets without the aid of a homing transmitter on the target "warhead."

I doubt any potential enemies of the US are going to send their warheads over with homing transmitters on the same frequency as our ABMs. I doubt they'll be sending missiles over without decoys.

http://www.cdi.org/program/index.cfm?programid=6

is one of the best sources of objective info I can find about Missile Defense issues, and their email updates contain the good and bad news about current efforts.

To my mind, though, nobody has rebutted the basic arguments against NMD/Star Wars, etc. put forth by the likes of the late Lars Erik Nelson and Nobel Physicist Steven Weinberg (some of these reports are still available for a fee from the archives at www.nybooks.com).

NMD exists for the mutual benefit of BFEE, Raytheon (who threw Bushco. Campaign wonderful "Texas Style" barbecues!) and other contractor-barrons of the Techno-military-industrial complex.

As with Halliburton/KBR in Iraq, Bushco. is simply taking money right out of our pockets and handing it right over to their cronies. No questions asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Missile Defense will keep us safe...
As long as our enemies purposely put something on their incoming missiles that will enable us to shoot it down.

In other words, making their missile say "Hello, I'm an incoming warhead. Please shoot me down."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Even if they are nice enough to do all that...
and tell us the precise time of the attack, we still can only shoot it down 20% of the time.

We'll all sleep so much better knowing Star Wars is on the job!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And all for the low price
Of 53.1 billion dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Like this idiot can get his head around the complexities of Star Wars.
Who's the threat Dimson?

Why has the MIC declared a financial War on America. By the time they are done sucking every last dime out of our pockets, what'll be left to defend?

Kerry should propose an Earth Based Defense Shield....reinvesting in alternative energy and infrastructure to give Americans real security in the 21st century.

The $400BB/year US military can't stop a commercial airliner with a 52 minute headstart from crashing into the Pentagon, think I'm going to worry about a non-existant missle threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It's like Daschle said
"National missile defense is the most expensive possible response to the least likely threat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. What a dumbshit!
He lives in a fantasy world, or he is a liar, whichever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Who's left to launch these missiles?
I mean crap, if we're talking China here, just say adios. No missile defense system is going to save our butts (or China's, or the world's) if we end up going toe to toe with China.

Just how many suicidal maniacs out there are just busting to launch missiles our way?

Dang this guy is a tool.

I can't take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. China spends $20BB on military defense.
That's 1/20 annually of our expeditures. No way will China pick a fight with the US.

The only maniac that has the technology to launch is that kook in North Korea. Since that train explosion about 2 months ago, he has seemed to keep a very low profile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Seriously, This could be the stupidest thing a President ever said.
So after we knock it down does he say, "Nah, nah, told you so."
Or if we miss the first incoming missle does he say, "Lucky shot. I bet you can't bomb us twice."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. when he went to Ft. Myers, he thought
it was another military base. Sad thing was, there were people that didn't appreciate him as much as Boeing does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. missiles are not the problem today, * is showing how inept he is.
Try nuclear briefcases, lipstick grenades, shoe bombs, and removing large quantities of stocks from the market (like just before 9/11, what happened to that, eh?).

Worse, Reagan was braindead when he started the program. Only a sheer idiot would try the same sci-fi against a problem whose perpetrators and methodology is considerably different than what was the case 20 years ago.

* is not defending anybody.

He's lost it.

The shield nonsense, if it works, would only be used to protect Isreal... other countries (only our current friends and business interests) would get the protection at a big cost.)

And what if the US is the tyrant that starts blackmailing the world? Who's going to shoot us down? (with more countries seeing what the US is doing, it's clear they'll eventually want to switch to the Euro over the dollar as mainstream exchange-rate currency. (Would you do business with a country that isn't improving its own people?) Didn't Iraq try that in their oil industry before Uncle George* blackmailed the country with his bombs? :shrug: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC