Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An opinion about Porter Goss, CIA nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 08:44 PM
Original message
An opinion about Porter Goss, CIA nominee
There has been allot teeth-grinding about Porter Goss and the fact that the Dems are supporting the nomination. IMHO he is not the man for the job, given the fact he is partisan (God knows what kind of things he might do) and the fact that, as a former CIA insider, he 'likes' the CIA. If he likes the CIA then he might be less inclined, or downright opposed the imposing the kind of change needed.
It would be better if you nominated someone who hated the CIA and would be totally motivated to change the way things run in Langley. Just understand this, Bush is a master of shifting political blame. If the Dems stand up and say 'Goss is gross!' or 'No way Goss!' Bush, the administration, his campaign staff will have been given a platinum opportunity to jump up and say 'See! The Dems aren't letting me have the tools to fight terror!' The Goss nomination is a lose-lose situation for the Dems. I am sure they don't like it either but it is the reality at present.

Just an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jeff30997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Dems are SUPPOSED to be the opposition party...
If they are not opposed. Then they aren't representing their constituency properly.

Although, you would never know it by the way they allow the repukes to roll over them at every turn of appointments..would you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are we opposed to the idea that the sun rises in the east?
Being in the opposition means doing it SMARTLY, not reflexively.

taking a contrary point, simply to be contrary is worse than being a neocon, it is guaranteed to fail. Look, like it or not, one or more of their ideas will be spot on, perhaps by accident, sure, but we have to be ready for the possibility. Clinton was a genius at grabbing the best the opposition had to offer and melding it into his own policies.

that was pure genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm still waiting for them to do it once...SMARTLY! nt
Clinton, notwithstanding- because everything he did, he did alone...

The Democrats are cowards, Howard Dean showed them how...

Too bad their moral backbones have selective memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Being lose-lose...
Go down fighting. Again, just an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:03 PM
Original message
Lack of oversight
Supporting the Goss nomination is ludicrous! He was chairman of the committee charged with oversight of the CIA. The CIA failed (according to the official story). How much sense does it make to put this man in charge of the agency???

Its like putting Barney Fife in charge of the Bureau of Prisons !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ok, now my opinion
I think Kerry should say "ok" with Goss. Then hint that if Goss does not work out and if Bush gets elected, then America is stuck with him. Kerry would fire him if he does not work. The Democrat would be a better choice because Bush sticks with his losers like Rumsfeld, Rice and Wolfowitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. he's a Bush yes man
he'll do whatever the Bush junta tells him to do. He'll say whatever the Bush junta tells him to say when they're contemplating another war. That's why he's being appointed.

President Kerry will probably fire him first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where do they find guys with names like this?
I never in my life knew anybody named Porter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nefarious Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. From one of the most corrupt districts in FL
One of the major narcotics throughpoint hubs in America, tremendous amount of cash changes hands for imported illegal controlled substances;

9-11 terrorists trained at an airport there: CIA, DEA, FBI, NSA, DIA, FDLE, Sheriffs, INS, and Customs all had knowledge of these individual's presence long before the tragedy. All of the investigations stalled due to decisions at ambiguous high levels to protect the suspects.

Coincidentally, Porter Goss has been a member of the House Select Intelligence Committee and is briefed at the highest levels.

If we let Goss manage the CIA, will we get more of the same only on a larger scale?

I hope Kerry will replace him with someone who has integrity and the will to route out wrongdoers.

__________________________________________________________

Pray for a swift and certain defeat to the Bush junta.
If they hold power any longer they will damage America irreparably.
Terror is a bad policy for any administration.
Failure to prevent acts of terrorism or failure to hold free and fair elections is a failure of government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC