Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush takes his August vacation in Plausible Denial. Hello Bifecta..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:01 AM
Original message
Bush takes his August vacation in Plausible Denial. Hello Bifecta..
We KNEW something would happen. Time to get away from the blackout. Time to get away from the Baghdad bombing.

FirstEnergy KNEW. Did Bush? At least it happened right after the market closed. Good timing.

Chalabi KNEW. Did he warn Bush? Did he warn the U.N.? Will anyone at the U.N. ask why not? Will just one reporter?

This should rally the world around Bush. Just like 9/11. Now we need a coalition of the drilling to get those Al Qaeda's. This is the "proof" Bush needed of the Saddam/Al Qaeda link.

The next product to market will be those pesky WMDs. Coming to a theater near you in September, soon after Labor Day, maybe to be announced on 9/11.

Except this time, Bush may not see the rating spike. May need another product.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Watched Nightline tonight
the spin is that the UN employed Iraqis to guard the area and were the so called security for the building. Now, I'm not sure who is telling the truth, but I could have sworn that I read the day after the attack that the cement truck blew past TWO US CHECKPOINTS, MANNED BY US SOLDIERS. I'll look for the article, but only one of them can be true - either it was Iraqis or it was US soldiers guarding the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Both could have been guarding the building.
The interesting thing is that U.S. is making it sound as though the U.N. hired dangerous Iraqis to guard the building.

If so, why were dangerous, untrustworthy Iraqis available for hire? The U.S. has been in Iraq for 5 months. If these particular Iraqis were dangerous &/or untrustworthy, why didn't the U.S. warn the U.N.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point
I went looking but can't find the article I was thinking about. However, from the various articles I'm looking at now it appears that the FBI has determined that it was a Russian made flatbed truck called a KAMAZ

with a huge, 500 pound 70's era Soviet made bomb strapped to the bed. Various other munitions were placed helter skelter around it. Now I begin to wonder - how could anyone not see the bomb as the truck drove up towards the building? Was this what people saw and mistakenly assumed it was a cement truck? A 500-pound bomb on the back of a flatbed truck? I'm sorry, but even the most dense security force would have noticed it wasn't a cement truck, and that a HUGE BOMB was strapped down to the bed of the truck!

It defies belief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. but to be fair couldn't you place munitions in the center of that bed and
then stack bags of cement around it ? Maybe it was something tricky like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Now that would make sense
Afterall, they had just built a cement wall around the area that was hit (I guess for protection) and maybe the truck looked just like all the other construction vehicles? Wouldn't stacking bags of cement around the munitions dampen somewhat the blast of the 500-pound bomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How about cement bags
filled with explosive materials (after removing the cement)? Could have been that, perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC