Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Admin. Outed Khan - AN AL QAEDA MOLE! Why isn't the media reporting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 09:48 AM
Original message
Bush Admin. Outed Khan - AN AL QAEDA MOLE! Why isn't the media reporting?
Edited on Sun Aug-08-04 10:40 AM by Skinner
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5902856

This is important information to relay to the american people!


Unmasking of Qaeda Mole a U.S. Security Blunder-Experts
Sat Aug 7, 2004 12:46 PM ET

By Peter Graff
LONDON (Reuters) - The revelation that a mole within al Qaeda was exposed after Washington launched its "orange alert" this month has shocked security experts, who say the outing of the source may have set back the war on terror.

Reuters learned from Pakistani intelligence sources on Friday that computer expert Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, arrested secretly in July, was working under cover to help the authorities track down al Qaeda militants in Britain and the United States when his name appeared in U.S. newspapers.

"After his capture he admitted being an al Qaeda member and agreed to send e-mails to his contacts," a Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters. "He sent encoded e-mails and received encoded replies. He's a great hacker and even the U.S. agents said he was a computer whiz."

Last Sunday, U.S. officials told reporters that someone held secretly by Pakistan was the source of the bulk of the information justifying the alert. The New York Times obtained Khan's name independently, and U.S. officials confirmed it when it appeared in the paper the next morning.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. front page story in the NY Times
and no mention of the outing...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/08/politics/08plot.html?pagewanted=1&hp

but boy oh boy are they pimping the 'terrorists are going to attack the election' line... :nuke:

p.s. you're post violates the copyright rule. 3-4 paragraphs only with a link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the new york times isn't widely read. It needs
to be reported on CNN/MSNBC.... abc, nbc cbs...

And I've given credit to the author and the paper... don't think its violative... and that not the point...this information needs to be more widely disseminated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He's right, Windy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's gathering steam
I heard CNN mention it this morning. I;m not sure how prominent it is, since I don't leave the dial on CNN any more, but while surfing I did hear mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Any thinking person
would know how hard it is to infiltrate these groups. By outing the mole, we have set back the war on terrorists. Not only that, but how hard will it be to recruit anyone to work for us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Windy - please read
please limit your copy and paste to 4 paragraphs
as per the Democratic Underground rules .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. wow
i sure fear for this mans family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieInCA Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rice admitted the Bush Admin outed him (CNN, MSNBC) - juancole.com
Edited on Sun Aug-08-04 12:52 PM by AussieInCA
snip:

The story of how the Bush administration prematurely outed Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, a double agent working for Pakistan against al-Qaeda, has finally hit cable television news. MSNBC picked up the story on Saturday.

On Sunday at around 12:30 pm, Wolf Blitzer's show referred to it. New York Senator Charles Schumer criticized the Bush administration for revealing Khan's name. He noted the annoyance of British Home Minister Blunkett (see below) and Pakistani Interior Minister Faisal Saleh Hayat with the Americans for blowing Khan's cover. He said Hayat complained that if Khan's name had not been reveaeled to the New York Times by the Bush administration, he might well have provided information that would have led to the capture of Usamah Bin Laden himself!

Blitzer then revealed that he had discussed the Khan case with US National Security Adviser Condaleeza Rice on background. He reported that she had admitted that the Bush administration had in fact revealed Khan's name to the press. She said she did not know if Khan was a double agent working for the Pakistani government. (!!!)

endsnip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's what I THOUGHT I heard Condi say to Wolf, but didn't believe...
my ears -- she didn't know???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenus Sister Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sibel Edmonds warned us!
There are, at best incompetent, at worst secret agents, working in the FBI translation units. Whoever revealed the name had to have found out via translation.

Please, someone, tell me heads will roll and Edmonds will finally be taken seriously.

Please, someone, tell me that the 9/11 Commission will explain why they ignored Edmonds.

Please, someone, tell me that I'm living in an alternate universe, and that in the REAL world, none of this could possibly happen.

My anger-at-this-administration-and-the-Pravda-like-media meter is so maxed out, I'm exhausted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's hope for John Stewart or Keith Olberman
Either one of them might bring it up this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. The networks aren't going to push this unless Democratic congressfolk...
start making an issue of it. Why we've been silent is a real mystery to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC