"Safe" Democrats should call for Congressional investigations...

[unfrigginreal]

if the story about the U.S. Government outing a spy working undercover to nab Al-Qaeda suspects is true. The only reason that I say *if* true, is that there aren't many news organizations running with the story. We should speak loudly and authoritatively that investigations are needed as this would be a treasonous offense.

At least get the "treason" word into the pundit lexicon ASAP. I've posted below the only links that I can find to this story.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/219869p-188947c.html

http://www.juancole.com/2004_08_01_juancole_archive.html#109185597245383648

[unfrigginreal]

1. Update to add MSNBC link

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5626850

[Imalittleteapot]

2. MSNBC link adds credibility to the story. nt

[unfrigginreal]

3. Update #2 - Unmasking of Qaeda mole a security blunder

at 7 August, 2004 18:00

By Peter Graff

LONDON (Reuters) - The revelation that a mole within al Qaeda was exposed after Washington launched its "orange alert" this month has shocked security experts, who say the outing of the source may have set back the war on terror.

<snip>

"The whole thing smacks of either incompetence or worse," said Tim Ripley, a security expert who writes for Jane's Defence publications. "You have to ask: what are they doing compromising a deep mole within al Qaeda, when it's so difficult to get these guys in there in the first place?

"It goes against all the rules of counter-espionage, counter-terrorism, running agents and so forth. It's not exactly cloak and dagger undercover work if it's on the front pages every time there's a development, is it?"

A source such as Khan -- cooperating with the authorities while staying in active contact with trusting al Qaeda agents -- would be among the most prized assets imaginable, he said.

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=561078§ion=news