Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush outs ANOTHER undercover agent! Jesus, these guys suck at their job!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
zaj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:08 PM
Original message
Bush outs ANOTHER undercover agent! Jesus, these guys suck at their job!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5626850/

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - The al-Qaida suspect named by U.S. officials as the source of information that led to this week’s terrorist alerts was working undercover, Pakistani intelligence sources said Friday, putting an end to the sting operation and forcing Pakistan to hide the man in a secret location.

Under pressure to justify the alerts in three Northeastern cities, U.S. officials confirmed a report by The New York Times that the man, Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan, was the source of the intelligence that led to the decision.

A Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters on Friday that Khan, who was arrested in Lahore secretly last month, had been actively cooperating with intelligence agents to help catch al-Qaida operatives when his name appeared in U.S. newspapers.

Monday evening, after Khan’s name appeared, Pakistani officials moved him to a secret location. “After his capture , he admitted being an al-Qaida member and agreed to send e-mails to his contacts,” a Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters. “He sent encoded e-mails and received encoded replies. He’s a great hacker, and even the U.S. agents said he was a computer whiz.”

The Times published a story Monday saying U.S. officials had disclosed that a man arrested in Pakistan was the source of the bulk of information leading to the security alerts. The Times identified him as Khan, although it did not say how it had learned his name. U.S. officials subsequently confirmed the name to other news organizations Monday morning. None of the reports mentioned that Khan was working under cover at the time, helping to catch al-Qaida suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sucks is a very mild.....how about grossly incompetent psychos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. No. They INTENTIONALLY SUBVERTED ANOTHER TERRORIST INVESTIGATION
Bush, himself, no doubt, is incompetent to do anything but clear brush on his 'ranch' although I doubt he'd even do THAT if it wasn't a photo-op.

But there are intelligent people around him who KNOW that you don't EXPOSE UNDERCOVER ASSETS. They really do know this. That is, you don't EXPOSE them unless you WANT to undermine whatever efforts they are engaged in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. They use you and stab you in the back
Bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is mind-numbing. Read what the article says about the
British operation.


"British police told Reuters on Friday that they had been forced to carry out the raids more hastily than planned, a day after Khan’s name appeared in the Times.

Such raids are usually carried out late at night or in the early morning, when suspects might be at home and less likely to resist. But showing clear signs of haste, British police pounced in daylight. Some suspects were taken in shops; others were caught in a high-speed car chase.

A British anti-terrorism police source would not comment on the reason for their quick action, but he confirmed the raids were carried out faster than planned: “It would be a fair assessment to say there was an urgency. Something can happen that prompts us to take action faster than we would,” he told Reuters."


Heads should be rolling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe the road leads to WH
so they are doing their best to disrupt the process.

Just wearing my :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I agree with your point. Deliberate disruptions by Bushcrime inc.
Just like Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Such Dumbasses.....
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. This pretty much proves LIHTI
The Let 9/11 happen through incompetence and may well have allowed another attack to happen through incompetence.

People, save this one, it'll go down the memory hole as soon as another attack happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandUpGuy Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bush said yesterday.....
He wasn't going to stop looking for ways to harm the USA.

If you assume black is white and up is down, I think you'll see that Bush does everything according to plan.


Look at it this way.....If Bush needed an excuse to blow the cover of an informant that was getting to close for comfort what better way to do it.

TERROR Threat.

Kill Kerry's bounce.
Inject some fear in to the people. (never hurts)
Blow the informants cover as proof of your initial threat.



Bush is not INCOMPETENT he is EVIL !!!!!!!

as posted elsewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Partisan political policy reigns supreme in the Busholini Casa Blanca
Never before have the national interests taken such a back seat to partisan political interests in the WHite House. These people make Nixon look like a founding father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I swear, bush never met a pooch he didn't screw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. LOL!!!! sorry but I have to,
what a bunch of toe-rags, maybe it was done deliberately because they felt this guy hasn't deliver, so they do what they do best out him.


He probably has failed to deliver Osama so this is their way of paying back.



:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. DING DING DING....BINGO....They didn't find OSAMA in time ....
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 02:46 AM by Tight_rope
this was just a warning...I wonder what the next move will be...Bomb Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yup, they burned an asset for Bush's short-term gain
I wonder how many Al Qaeda infiltrators we're monitoring? My guess is not many, and burning one of our assets was probably an extravagance of outsize proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe this kind of thing is why we have no human intelligence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh sure, let's piss off the only nation that we any type of a
relationship with, why not! Sounds to me that the British intelligence folks may be pretty angry with "the weed that would be king" and his band of rethugs.

The admin is uncheney'ng believable! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. "computer whiz"....he must have gotten one of those outsourced jobs
that helped him to advance his career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoping4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. You know that is an interesting slant even though I am aware
of the sarcasm. I wonder if there are geopolitical consequences for outsourcing high tech jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
18. We need bumper stickers.
"Resident AWOL: outing our CIA agents to our enemies."

"Was America safe on Bush's watch? 9/11/01"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC