Malloy's caller is praising DU!

[Gryffindor_Bookworm]

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

[kaitykaity]

1. Who is that????

:wow:

[Ivote]

2. Heard him

n/t

[ALago1]

Heard it!

Good to know Mike peruses these forums. We're a pretty smart bunch :)

[Sporadicus]

3. Yes

and Mike is returning the compliment to DU.

[King Coal]

4. I just heard that. Pretty cool.

[Imalittleteapot]

5. Way to go Brad. n/t

[buycitgo]

8. that would be me

told him to come here and post; that he's got an audience here already

told him to get Sibel Edmonds as guest; said that there should be people put in JAIL based on information she has

that she wrote an open letter to Thomas Kean, and that NOBODY is covering it

said stories like Sandy Berger, Love Story, Love Canal last forever, because of the right wing echo chamber, and that AAR could/should be the start of our own LEFT wing echo chamber

also, WHERE are the democrat surrogates with a SPINE to speak for us, not the likes of Lieberman, Evan Bayh, or Donna Brazille (god bless her)

[Feanorcurufinwe]

10. good job!

btw, to answer your question, the reason you see Lieberman, Bayh, et al as surrogates all the time is that the producers of the show get to pick the surrogate.

[buycitgo]

14. i know; was going to mention the fact that the REASON

that's who we see is a conscious decision on the part of the stations, cause they don't WANT Barney Frank or Rahm Emanuel on.

the closest they get is somebody like Rangel, but he's not so up on his facts, the way Rangel is

I understand Boxer did pretty well the other night with somebody, but that's the exception, rather than the rule

[kaitykaity]

11. Good job, Brad!!

:thumbsup:

[Gryffindor_Bookworm]

12. Brad....

:yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock: :yourock:

[Pallas180]

17. Excellent buycitgo!! thanks from the Plame Thread guys.

:hi:

[buycitgo]

19. thank YOU!

If they EVER star reporting on that story, it has as much potential to bring down the house as Edmonds, and has the advantage of much greater coverage so far

but Edmonds has the advantage of being...........HOT!

so is Wilson's wife, but I think she'll stay out of the spotlight, unless she loses her CIA job

do you think your story will have any sort of legal bump before the election?

what's the latest word? is JMM the best place to keep track? outside here, that is

[LTR]

6. Malloy often shouts out to DU

At least someone in radio likes us.

[physioex]

7. Glad to have Malloy back....

But he kinda screwed up and talk about Capitol Hill Blue which I don't like as a news source....

[NecessaryOnslaught]

9. He was off.

Sibel wasn't hired until after 9/11. She has accused the FBI of failing to translate items related to individuals who were detained after 9/11. Art Students? :shrug:

[papau]

13. I believe she talked about Docs pre 911 - and internal poor work

But you are correct that she was hired after 911.

I liked "Art Students" and wonder why not mention "the van of folks with Israeli passports"?

While neither has a thing to do with Sibel, I do enjoy the attempt to connect the Mossad - or the CIA - with everything! Heck on some things they do deserve to be connected - esp. the CIA

But not this time! Sibel has been interviewed many times - and those interviews are a worthwhile read!

:-)

[buycitgo]

15. did you read the letter she wrote, or the thread about her?

she was referring to translations that she found about that related to PRE 911 stuff

I didn't say anything about when she started working, did I?

I dunno, cause I can't remember what I said

anyway, let me find the thing I was talking about

this is what I was referencing, from an article at commondreams

'I Saw Papers That Show US Knew al-Qa'ida Would Attack Cities With Airplanes'

She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave details of specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave them everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented. These things can be established very easily."

She added: "There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used ­ but not specifically about how they would be used ­ and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major cities ­ with skyscrapers."

..................

She said said it was clear there was sufficient information during the spring and summer of 2001 to indicate terrorists were planning an attack. "Most of what I told the commission ­ 90 per cent of it ­ related to the investigations that I was involved in or just from working in the department. Two hundred translators side by side, you get to see and hear a lot of other things as well."

"President Bush said they had no specific information about 11 September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September," she said. There was, however, general information about the use of airplanes and that an attack was just months away.


can you remember how I introduced it? don't want to be inaccurate in any sense

thx

[NecessaryOnslaught]

16. You are correct sir.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you were inaccurate.

It seemed that you were inferring she was being hushed prior to 9/11.

Just my perception. Great call anyhow! :yourock:

[buycitgo]

18. no, that's fine. It's hard to remember what I said, and if I did say

she was there at the time, that would have been wrong

you KNOW how the wingnuts spring on the slightest inaccuracies, and use it as proof that those on the left cannot be believed, unlike them, haha