Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Little thing about Kucinich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Captain Absolut Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:46 PM
Original message
Little thing about Kucinich
It's from slate.com


The story: Kucinich "was elected mayor on a promise that he would not sell off or privatize the beloved and trusted city-owned power system, though Cleveland was deeply in debt. Cleveland Magazine offered this summary: 'Kucinich refused to yield to bankers who gave him a choice: Sell the Municipal Light System to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. or the city will go into default. ...' When Kucinich refused to sell Muny Light, the banks took the unprecedented step of refusing to roll over the city's debt, as is customary. Instead, they pushed the city into default. It turned out the banks were thoroughly interlocked with the private utility, CEI, which would have acquired monopoly status by taking over Muny Light. … By holding to his campaign promise and putting principle above politics, he lost his re-election bid and his political career was derailed. But today Kucinich stands vindicated for having confronted the Enron of his day, and for saving the municipal power company. 'There is little debate,' wrote Cleveland Magazine in May 1996, 'over the value of Muny Light today. Now Cleveland Public Power, it is a proven asset to the city that between 1985 and 1995 saved its customers $195,148,520 over what they would have paid CEI.'" (Kucinich campaign Web site)

Reality check: Banks expect borrowers to show responsibility. Muny Light was one of Cleveland's few remaining assets and had been losing money for a decade. The banks wanted the city to sell it to cover previous loans. As one bank director put it to Kucinich (in the Cleveland Magazine article Kucinich selectively quotes), "You have the opportunity to straighten up some of your house by selling your losing Muny Light plant. If you're going to ask us to roll over these notes, you've got to show some financial responsibility." In exchange, the banks offered to throw in an extra $50 million loan.

Kucinich rejected the offer. He asked the banks to wait a few months to let him hold a special election on an income tax increase to pay off the loans. The banks said no. Kucinich then tried to force the tax increase in a last-minute city council session and was rebuffed. Cleveland Magazine concluded, "It was love of confrontation that eventually forced him into this ultimate confrontation." The default made Cleveland a national laughingstock and led to Kucinich's overwhelming re-election defeat. In 1995, a panel of 25 historians ranked him the seventh-worst mayor in American history.


I guess everyone can't get it right all the time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Garage Queen Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two questions:
1. Which Democrat are YOU supporting?

2. Why do you feel the need to try and bash Kucinich? (I'm not a DK gal, but I've decided to live and let live.)

Thank you in advance for your kind response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjbuchanan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. great advice
no need to attack within the family.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. A nice 9 post hit & run.
How does this change that he save the people of Cleveland millions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. legends will die hard
I think Kucinich supporters would not want to hear this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Propoganda
that does nothing to refute the claim that DK saved Cleveland $195 million
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabid_nerd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. "the banks took the unprecedented step..."
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 12:55 PM by rabid_nerd
"...of refusing to roll over the city's debt, as is customary"

Disregarding that not paying bills on time gives someone the right to forclose/declare in default, it IS unusual for such an occurence to take place.

I also am not a DK guy but there IS obvious evidence of collusion between the banks and the interested outside power company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Banks lose money when they foreclose
which is why they are usually happy to roll it over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. There was. I lived there at the time.
The powers that be were in cahoots to defeat Kucinich at every turn possible. He was a populist mayor in a big business town. When DK was mayor, over 70% of this nation's industry was within a 500 mile radius of Cleveland. It was essential to big business to control Cleveland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Gotta agree with you. *shock*
Am I gonna believe a banker or DK? DK by a mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good one
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 01:04 PM by ThirdWheelLegend
Obviously the corporate banking version of the story is the best source.. why would they mislead?

“There is little debate,” wrote Cleveland Magazine in May 1996, “over the value of Muny Light today. Now Cleveland Public Power, it is a proven asset to the city that between 1985 and 1995 saved its customers $195,148,520 over what they would have paid CEI.”


TWL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. You ARE joking right?
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 06:17 PM by tlcandie
<quote>
Obviously the corporate banking version of the story is the best source.. why would they mislead?
<quote>

ROFLMAO.. unbelieveable! :crazy: :silly:


EDIT: I'm sorry, you were being sarcastic and I missed it! I was so shocked to read what you wrote that I about fell out of my chair :) Apologies!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I haven't committed to any candidate yet, but this "little thing"
is unfair.

You repeat the "story" as if it's such bs because it's told as an absolute version of events rather than a summary of the event, then you throw in your OPINION as absolute fact to rebut the story.

Do I believe the "story" is a complete record of what happened, NO. But your opinion of what "banks expect" and how they related that info to Dennis (were you at this meeting) are wholly unfair and misleading. You also intimate that banks don't get, and grant, requests for delayed payments.

Please spend your time to refute the POINT of the story, Clevelanders saved money and ultimately, they owe that to Dennis' moves.

Why mask your point in such a disguised manner?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yawn....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm glad Kucinich stuck it out, and now the city still owns Muny Light
Kucinich took the political hit, but it paid off for the city in the long run. Good for Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Absolut Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. I wasn't hitting and running
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 01:17 PM by Captain Absolut
I'm supporting Dean unless Clark runs.

I wasn't bashing DK...I was just commentting that a left leaning online mag gave this on DK.

I was just saying that no matter how good one thinks a candidate is they can't always do right. I like DK, but I don't think he's electable.

Plus I like getting people frazzled...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think this paints Kucinich in a good light
The banks tried to blackmail him, but he stood by his principles and made a decision that ultimately benefited the people of Cleveland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I agree.
Dennis comes arcross as actualy wanting to work with the banks on this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stumpy Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. You're spouting dishonest tripe.
You totally ignore two very important facts:

One has been mentioned, that it is customary for banks to rollover on a municipality's debt.

The other is that CEI's bank, which I think was Cleveland Trust (Now AmeriTrust). Also the bank owned a lot of stock in CEI.

This was blackmail, pure and simple.

Check out www.kucinich.us/powertothepeople.htm

Furthermore, I suggest a letter writing campaign to AmeriTrust. It's time they pay for their transgressions.


Stumpy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. So . . . Kucinich resisted a standard World Bank ploy
And that's the reason to bash him? Check out Greg Palast's "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" for the object lesson of Argentina, which succumbed to the bankers by selling off its utilities and the like. The World Bank and the IMF used the exact same tactics: Sell off your water, your electricity and other sources of public income, or face the economic consequences of no longer being able to borrow money."

So, sell Argentina did. And if you'll recall, their economy collapsed last year. Not just a recession, not a depression, but a full-blown collapse. But the banks got their money.

Venezuela faced the same "offer it couldn't refuse" last year, and resisted. Hugo Chavez has been mercilessly vilified in the popular media (including the "left-leaning" - hah! - Salon.com) as a socialist, a communist, and so forth, even having to withstand a military coup attempt backed by the Bush administration. But Chavez has stood his ground, Venezuela still has an economy, and the bankers have had to move on to other pastures.

I'd say Kucinich comes out looking pretty heroic from this episode which happened . . . uh, which happened . . . say, when did this happen? Ten years ago? Twenty? Little thing about the clip-and-paste, it doesn't say. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. What you posted vindicates Kucinich
Kucinich rejected the offer. He asked the banks to wait a few months to let him hold a special election on an income tax increase to pay off the loans. The banks said no. Kucinich then tried to force the tax increase in a last-minute city council session and was rebuffed.

It seems that Kucinich was trying to work out a deal, with that tax referendum to pay down the debt, but the banks played hardball.

Also, Kucinich had inherited the debt from a previous (Republican) Perk adminstration, and the banks did not play the same kind of hardball with the Republican they played w. Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. What you posted vindicates Kucinich
Kucinich rejected the offer. He asked the banks to wait a few months to let him hold a special election on an income tax increase to pay off the loans. The banks said no. Kucinich then tried to force the tax increase in a last-minute city council session and was rebuffed.

It seems that Kucinich was trying to work out a deal, with that tax referendum to pay down the debt, but the banks played hardball.

Also, Kucinich had inherited the debt from a previous (Republican) Perk adminstration, and the banks did not play the same kind of hardball with the Republican they played w. Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. What you posted vindicates Kucinich
Kucinich rejected the offer. He asked the banks to wait a few months to let him hold a special election on an income tax increase to pay off the loans. The banks said no. Kucinich then tried to force the tax increase in a last-minute city council session and was rebuffed.

It seems that Kucinich was trying to work out a deal, with that tax referendum to pay down the debt, but the banks played hardball.

Also, Kucinich had inherited the debt from a previous (Republican) Perk adminstration, and the banks did not play the same kind of hardball with the Republican they played w. Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC