Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich: Power to the People

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 08:16 AM
Original message
Kucinich: Power to the People
http://kucinich.us/powertothepeople.htm

Power to the People: My Story


By Dennis Kucinich, on the campaign trail in Iowa

With an estimated 50 million Americans and Canadians left without power and in some cases water, common sense requires us to reflect on the absurdity of deregulation of public utilities. The right of utility franchise is vested in the people. We give utilities permission to operate, and enable them to set up a profit making business in exchange for the promise of affordable and reliable service.

In 1992, investor owned utilities pushed the Democratic House to pass HR776 which granted electric utilities broad powers. The bill was supposed to restructure the electric utility industry to spur competition.

Utilities used deregulation to affect a series of mergers limiting competition. In order to accelerate profits, cost cutting ensued, involving the layoff of thousands of utility company employees, including some who where responsible for maintenance of generation, transmission, and distribution systems. A number of investor-owned utilities stopped investing in the maintenance and repair of their own equipment, and, instead, cut costs to enhance the value of their stock rather than spending money to enhance the value of their service.

A prime case in point is FirstEnergy Corp, late of Ohio. FirstEnergy formed through a merger of utility companies which owned nuclear power plants which often were neither used nor useful, and as a result incurred huge debt. FirstEnergy's predecessor, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) in the 1950s and 60s was a high performing blue chip stock until they invested in nuclear power.

FirstEnergy has tried without success to keep online a very troublesome nuclear power facility at Port Clinton, Ohio, the Davis-Besse plant. Davis-Besse is currently shut down and has been for some time. FirstEnergy and federal regulators failed to properly monitor the operations of the plant, resulting in conditions where the plant's reactor vessel was threatened with a breach when boric acid ate into the head of the reactor.

Millions of people in the Midwest and the water supply of our entire Great Lakes region were at risk because of First Energy's negligence, improper maintenance, and actual cover-up of the degradation of the reactor. Furthermore, federal regulators determined that notwithstanding the peril which was presented to one of the largest populated areas of the United States, FirstEnergy's financial condition necessitated the continued operation of the flawed reactor. The regulators put profit ahead of public interest.

If there was ever an example of an unholy alliance between government and industry, this is it. If there was ever an example of the failure of necessary regulation by the government of an investor-owned utility, it is found in the government's failure to regulate FirstEnergy. Now, according to published reports, the blackout which affected an estimated 50 million people may have begun in the FirstEnergy system.

I've been familiar with First Energy and the challenge of utility monopolies for over 30 years. Early in my career, in the 1970s, I watched FirstEnergy's predecessor, CEI, as it was hard at work trying to undermine the ability of the City of Cleveland to operate its own municipal electric system. CEI conducted a tireless crusade to attempt to put the city's publicly owned system, Muny Light, out of business. Muny Light competed against CEI in a third of the city and provided municipal power customers with savings on their electric bill of 20-30 percent. It also provided cheaper electricity for 76 city facilities and thousands of Cleveland street lights, saving taxpayers millions of dollars each year.

An antitrust review revealed that CEI had committed numerous violations of federal antitrust law in its attempt to put Muny Light out of business. CEI worked behind the scenes to block Muny Light from purchasing power from other power companies. CEI became the only power company Muny Light could buy from. At that point, CEI sharply increased and sometimes tripled the cost of purchase power to Muny Light. And, as a result, Muny Light began to lose money. CEI used Muny Light's weakened operational and financial condition (which they created) as evidence of the public system's lack of viability and as proof that the only way the people of Cleveland could have reliable power was for the city to sell its electric system to CEI.

Throughout this period, the Cleveland media, which received substantial advertising revenues from CEI, crusaded against the city's ownership of a municipal electric system. In 1976, after years of work to undermine Muny Light, CEI finally succeeded in getting the mayor and the council of Cleveland to agree to sell Muny Light, giving CEI a monopoly on electric power in the Cleveland area and enabling CEI to greatly expand its rate base to get more revenue to pay for its rapidly mounting expenses associated with building nuclear power plants.

At that time, I was clerk of the Cleveland Municipal Court, a citywide elected office. I organized a civic campaign to save Muny Light. People gathered signatures in freezing rain to block the sale. I ran for mayor of Cleveland on a promise that if elected, my first act would be to cancel the sale of Muny Light. I won the election. I cancelled the sale.

The Muny Light issue came to a head on December 15, 1978, when Ohio's largest bank, Cleveland Trust, the 33rd largest bank in America at that time, told me that they would not renew the city's credit on 15 million dollars worth of loans taken out by the previous administration unless I would agree to sell Cleveland's municipally owned utility to CEI.

On that day, by that time, the sale of Muny Light was being promoted by both Cleveland newspapers, virtually all of the radio and TV stations in town, the entire business community, all the banks, both political parties, and several unions, as well as a majority of the Cleveland City Council. All I had to do was to sign my name to legislation and the system would have sold and the city credit "protected." The chairman of Cleveland Trust even offered 50 million dollars of new credit if I would agree to sell Muny Light.

Where I come from it matters how much people pay for electricity. I grew up in the inner city of Cleveland, the oldest of 7 children. My parents never owned a home, they lived in 21 different places by the time I was 17, including a couple of cars. I remember when there were 5 children and my parents living in a 3 room upstairs apartment on Cleveland's east side. My parents would sometimes sit in the kitchen at one of those old white enamel top tables, which, when the surface was chipped, was black underneath. When they counted their pennies, I could hear them clicking on the enamel top table. Click, Click, Click.

When I was in the board room with the Chairman of Cleveland Trust Bank, I was thinking about my parents counting their pennies and I could hear those pennies hitting the enamel top table. So, I said no to the sale of Muny Light to CEI. At Midnight, Cleveland Trust put the City of Cleveland into default.

Later, it was revealed, that Cleveland Trust and CEI had four interlocking directors. Cleveland Trust was CEI's bank. Together with another bank, Cleveland Trust owned a substantial share of CEI stock and had numerous other mutual interests. Public power was saved in Cleveland. I lost the election in 1979 with default as the major issue. Cleveland Trust changed it name to AmeriTrust. The new mayor changed the name of Muny Light to Cleveland Public Power.

In 1993, the City of Cleveland announced that it was expanding Muny/Cleveland Public Power. It was the largest expansion of any municipal electric system in America. I had been long gone from major elected office. In fact, after the default, most political analysts considered my career over. I had been asked many times by other politicians why I just didn't make the deal and sell the light system, especially when my career was on the line. I believe that there are, in fact, some things more important than the next election.

After I left City Hall, I couldn't get a job in Cleveland, I almost lost my home, and my marriage fell apart. I was living in California when a Cleveland reporter called to tell me that people were saying the expansion could not have happened without my making a decision to save the system. People in Cleveland began to say that I was right not to sell Muny Light and they asked me to come back. I ran for State Senate in 1994 on a slogan "because he was right" with little rays of yellow light shining behind my name on my campaign signs. I was one of the few Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent that year in a state election.

Two years later, I was one of the few Democrats to unseat a Republican incumbent to gain election to Congress. My campaign signs had a light bulb behind my name with the words "Light up Congress."

Today, I'm running for President of the United States and I want to light up America, and a good place to start will be to shed light on a deregulation process that has abandoned the public interest.

--
Written by Dennis J. Kucinich on the campaign trail in Iowa, and adapted
from his guest entry on the blog of Stanford law professor Lawrence
Lessig: http://lessig.org/blog/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oracle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kucinich is the only person I feel comfortable voting for...
https://www.kucinich.us/

Perhaps because he's the only real liberal running.

I like Wesley Clark...Dean, not too crazy about...reminds me of Eugene McCarthy when I was in Jr. High...seems he goes with the trends and which ever way the wind blows.

However, Dean seems much better to me than the other mainstream fucking "moderates" thumbs up their asses...don't make too high waves clowns, that Rove and the Republicans adore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a man who has never betrayed the public trust
Every time I see how hard Dennis Kucinich works for "us" - all of us, no matter what color or creed, no matter what economic level - it makes me want to see this man at the helm of our nation, guiding us to becoming, again, the nation that we can be, instead of the degraded lowest common denominator dung-heap its become under the BFEE.

As Zogby pointed out the other day, Bush is now tied with an "unnamed Democrat." The Democrat we nominate is going to be the next President of the United States of America.

For our sakes, and the sakes of the future generations, we need to nominate the best Democratic candidate. We don't need to "settle for less."

We need Dennis Kucinich.

Dan Brown
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Kucinich could beat Bush
If we had a unified party, and a way to blunt the attacks of corporate media, we could get Kucinich in the White House. It sure as hell won't be easy. His message and platform is exactly what most Americans want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hi goodhue!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just DO NOT UNDERSTAND
why people constantly say DK is absolutely, positively, unable to get elected to president.

The ONLY thing standing in his way is the media's lack of attention towards him and his campaign. Seems they're stuck in the Dean/Kerry/Edwards fixation and no one else can get a word in edgewise.

DK is my man, and I do believe that alot of people who voted Green in 2000 will vote for DK in the primaries and that they will HELP to get him nominated in 2004.

As a very lefty lefty leftist democrat, I'm tired of always having to 'give an inch' and vote for slightly-left of GW candidates.

I don't want a moderate. We've always had moderates. WE're being innundated with moderates.

Moderates are constantly telling us that *WE* have to compromise OUR beliefs---but they never do.

WE have to go with a lesser candidate.

WE have to put our ideas and morals and politics in the closet because god knows, America can't handle a LEFTY :eyes:

Centrists and moderates---please let us have DK in 2004 and possibly 2008, and then I promise that we'll let y'all hold on to the next 200 years worth of presidental elections.

Just give us ONE CHANCE to show that a progressive lefty can do the job, and do the job well. We promise we'll give you back your strangle hold....j
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Zogby says Bush is tied with "unnamed Democrat"
__Bush Re-Elect Drops to 42%-47% - Tied with Unnamed Dem

"A Zogby poll released today shows that when asked if George Bush deserves re-election, only 46% of Americans said yes and a narrow majority, 47%, said it is time for someone new. The poll, with a margin of error of +/- 3%, on a generic 2004 ballot between Bush and a Democratic candidate, Bush received 47% of support, and a Democratic candidate received 44%, putting the Bush and a Democratic candidate in a statistical dead heat still a year before the Democratic candidate is selected. The second poll, released yesterday by Fox News/Opinion Dynamics and published in National Journal's Hotline showed should the 2004 election be held today, those planning to reelect Bush had dropped to 42%."

http://www.zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=5528

Electability is not the issue. The person we nominate is going to be the next President of the United States. The question is, are we committed to making this nation and the world better for ourselves and the people who come after us, or are we just ready to "settle" for whatever is served up in front of us by the corporate media?

Dennis Kucinich has fought for the public trust, and won many, many battles. Dennis Kucinich has a clear vision for future of the nation and the world.

We deserve a world that makes Dennis Kucinich the President of the United States of America.

Dan Brown
Saint Paul, Minnesota

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC