Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Things Aren't Looking Good For Blair Based On This Editorial Round-Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 11:06 PM
Original message
Things Aren't Looking Good For Blair Based On This Editorial Round-Up
'A reckoning will come in the end'

The Sunday papers reflect on the first week of the judge's probe

Monday August 18, 2003

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/comment/0,13747,1020796,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone know if his good pal Bushie has said anything about
Blair recently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is neither a flippant nor, I hope, a naive question but how do you
think Blair's future effects us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. short of a death-blow, but hardly just a flesh wound, ma'am...
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 01:21 AM by PurityOfEssence
If Blair is brought down over this, it will be a big kick in the face for Junior. For Blair, the whole issue is WMDs, because that was the entire sales pitch. Taking him down will be tantamount to showing that argument to have been either gross incompetence (yeah, right) or deliberate railroading.

The herd instinct has been well used by the neo-cons; this would be it working against them. To show that it was all cooked up leads one to believe that it was cooked up for a reason...hmmm...

It would bring questions; the Junta hates that.

One of the worst things that has come out of all this is that the world truly hates us now, and simply can't trust us. As a mere 4% of the world's population, we can't afford that kind of pariah status. They can live a whole lot better without us than we can without them, and as we become a rogue state, less leeway will be given.

People who's business interests will be disrupted by the destabilizing of a major country's politics will be most displeased.

Let's just say that it can't help.

More to the point of your question: don't feel bad about not having a glib response of how irrelevant (man, I hate that word) or important it would be to the current gangsters, I think that anyone who can really answer with certainty what will happen is probably fooling him/herself.

It can't be good or even neutral, though, to have it bring down the government of the only real ally we have in this adventurism...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Great Post!!!
well thought...and yes I think that the effort to undermine Blair there will have some reprecussions with Bush's admin
After all, the UK is one of the highly touted pillars of the whole coalition...
Leads to the obvious point...if the brits think their gov't is lying...then domestically the question will be asked.

What will Bush do? Paint the British as the French
Step back and look --who are bush's friends on this point of diplomacy--Blur and Berlocussi and Aswar...
Not much to go on in the foreign relations ploy...
Only fall back for the Junta is the the usual refrain of 'the world hates us coz of our freedom'
Sickening that these guys are so out of control

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Another thing: Bush wants Blair gone.
Remember that US diplomat from Greece who resigned over Iraq? He was on the Dianne Rehm show and said that one of the most unseemly aspects of this whole thing was that Bush was intentionally undermining Blair, who is a patriot who cares deeply about the best interests of his citizens.

Exactly. Bush IS INTENTIONALLY UNDERMINING Blair. A career diplomat can see it. I can see it. It's so obvious.

Now why in the world would Bush be pursuing an end like that if he thinks it's going to hurt him? It makes no sense. If Blair gets dumped, Bush will dance on Blair's grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. interesting point; let's run it up and see...
...who salutes.

This has been advanced before--not to take the wind out of your sails for your commendable perspicacity--and may well be part of the bargain. Blair moved his party farther to the right, like his pal Clinton, and built a thoroughly solid power base. The Bushies would always like to push everyone farther to the right, to the point where we can open the discussion about whether wages are really necessary, whether workers have the right to leave their jobs, and the like. They probably dream of pushing it even farther than that.

I don't think they'd want Blair to fall here though, because of the discredit that could befall them, but maybe you're right. One of the problematic things about second guessing these curs is finding a way to skew a civilized mind to their outlook. If you accept the premise that they think they can get away with anything--ample proof for that, eh?--then maybe they are willing to take an odd hit or two to be able to bring the shell-shocked Thatcherites back. Maybe it's just an additional benefit to everything. Maybe it really is the big unified field theory of ultra ratfuck conspiracies, but I'm a little twitchy about signing on to that one.

In short (ha) you may be right. If you are, we're in even deeper effluvia than I thought, but then again, they're so reckless that even their money and power can't sustain them. The really wealthy and powerful don't like deliberate destabilization of this sort. Then again, if the payoff's big enough...

Personally, I want to see Blair burn for this. I want to see screaming outcry and I want him packed off to that chicken farm in Surrey with Sherlock Holmes. My true ire is reserved for our domestic breed of raptors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. That is so unlikely. Look at history. The US and UK have moved
in tandem. Tories wins there, a Republican wins here. A Dem wins here, Labour wins there.

If Blair goes, you'll see a resurgent Tory party. Bush will win a second term here and the Tories will win there. Then they'll work together like they did in the Thatcher-Regan years to have a mutual protection society. Britain will probably even pull out of Iraq, leaving the US to run the show on its own, which will destroy the European economy, and lead, Bush hopes, to a schism in Europe which will end the EU project.

The only thing that makes this scenario unlikely is that Blair, as soon as Bush became president, saw the handwriting on the wall. He knew Bush would use his power to undermine Labour in the UK, so Blair called an early election. You only have to call an election every five years (except your own party can vote you out). By running early, Blair ensured that he wouldn't have to run again until the second year of Democratic presidency, provided Bush gets the boot. Even if Bush doesn't get the boot, it's possible that America will be so weakened, that Bush's influence on British policits will wane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You make good sense. I am still wondering if the "average" American
will blink twice if Blair goes? They will hear that the "anti-wars, liberals" are happy about this. Therefore, it is bad and therefore we should just go on our very unmerry way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Blair's complicity in the lies used as a rational for war
affected us, our soldiers and about 7,000 now dead Iraqi civilians. As long as he holds office his lap dog acquiescence to Bush gives weight to the use of the word coalition, a guise intended to cloak our respective militaries implementation as a publicly funded, privately directed, mercenary force.

Does that clear it up for you?

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. War Crimes
Blair and co. has to be charged with War Crimes, and that has to be followed by Bush and co. being similarly charged.

Jacob Matthan
http://www.findians.com/educated.html
Oulu, Finland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. With the revelation that Blair intervened personally to harrass Kelly,
On top of all the other shit, I'd imagine he's had his last leg knocked out from under him. Not only did he lie about the need for war, he and his minions hounded a man to suicide for criticizing them, using public inquiries and indiscreet backstabbing as their weapons of choice. At last all of England can see the mindset of the scum at the helm of the ship of state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Change the name in this sentence...
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 01:48 AM by God_bush_n_cheney
"Even more difficult for Tony Blair and his inner circle will be to change the impression, now universally held, that this is a government so addicted to spin that it cannot change its ways"


To this

Even more difficult for George Bush* and his inner circle will be to change the impression, now universally held, that this is a government so addicted to spin that it cannot change its ways.

When Tony Falls can Bush* be far behind? Will they fall like dominoes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC