Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: War not inciting terrorists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:09 PM
Original message
Bush: War not inciting terrorists
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In an interview with Irish television ahead of a U.S.-EU summit, U.S. President George W. Bush defended his stance on Iraq and said the war has not incited terrorists.

Bush leaves Friday for Ireland, where he will meet with European Union leaders Saturday before heading to Turkey for a NATO summit. Ireland currently holds the rotating six-month presidency of the EU.

In the sometimes combative interview with Irish network RTE -- the president at one point asking the interviewer to let him finish his answers -- Bush disputed the suggestion that the world is more dangerous with the focus on Iraq instead of Afghanistan and al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

"On September 11, 2001, we were attacked in an unprovoked fashion -- everybody thought the world was calm," the president told RTE's Carole Coleman at the White House.

(more)
<http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/25/bush.irish.tv/index.html>

What planet does he live on anyway????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. You can bet he will say that the movie F9/11 is inciting them.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. How the crap does bush* connect that America was 'calm' on 9/11
to more terrorist activity today??? Is he saying calm is an indication of terror...and as long as he can continue chaos we will all be safe???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Also, on CSPAN, Pedro announced that the reporter who
interviewed Bush was scheduled to Interview Laura this morning as that reporter's network had the exclusives. Since she questioned Bush's answers, It was announced this morning that her exclusive interview with Laura was canceled.

He was so ticked. You could really tell that reporter was getting under his skin. I loved it.

Also, when he was standing at the podium with EU leaders with the castle in the background, someone must have asked him a question that pissed him off because in his ohh so arrogant way he stated (paraphrasing here) I have a vision, then a plan, then I LEAD, and then the chips fall were they may.

Even the Irish hate him. Think he gets it yet???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. He is to dense to get it.
Shrub is a little man that has a Napolean complex. He will never understand anything beyond what his shallow brain has been programmed to keep repeating ad nauseum. "I don't understand poor people." GW Bush

The Repugnant Award

I can't decide which BushCo Cult member is more repugnant after him.

I am against the Death Penalty but the members of Bush Cult make it difficult to maintain my belief. I keep being tempted by a vision of them all lined up in front of a firing squad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bacchant Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Typical Bush, shouting out both holes at once
"The insurgents killing our troops are terrorists, not the Iraqi people"

"The war is not inciting terrorists"


Thanks Dunceboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. What else CAN he say? Of course he and Cheney HAVE to keep
defending their war and their "evidence" of an Al Qaeda-Iraq connection. What other choice do they have? Confess it was all a hoax, and that they have no evidence of a connection, and therefore, they are responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, and even more maimings?

They keep on with their deny-deny-deny program. But we're not buying anymore. Some never did. And the rest of us have come to our senses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. UUUmmm, excuse me Mr President....
You said On September 11, 2001, we were attacked in an unprovoked fashion -- everybody thought the world was calm,"

Did you forget the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily briefing? You know, the one entitled Bin Laden determined to Attack in the United States ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. The revised State Department Terrorism Report says otherwise!
http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=9416&cid=12&cname=The%20New%20War

The TTIC was created last year and is an independent organization that reports directly to the Director of Central Intelligence and is staffed by analysts from the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI's Counterterrorism Division, the Pentagon and other intelligence agencies.

Mr Powell defended the intgegrity of the process and the general conclusions of the earlier report, saying the narrative would not be changed substantially and that, "On balance, it is a good report."

Media seized on the large discrepancies between the numbers of reported deaths due to international terrorism in the initial and amended reports -- a figure that more than doubled, from 307 in the intitial report to 625 in the revised report.

But the revised number -- 625 -- is still 100 deaths shy of the tally in 2002: 725.

There was also a gain in the number of incidents reported -- to 208, a slight gain from the 198 reported in 2002. The earlier report had understated the number of attacks by 8, saying there were 190 reported terrorist attacks. The new report revises that number upward by 18.

But the actual number for 2003 still represented a 42 per cent decline from 2001's 355 attacks, the State Department said in the preface to its amended report.

The largest discrepancies in the report dealt with the numbers of victims injured in terrorist attacks.

The initial report said that a total of 1,593 persons were wounded in the attacks that occurred in 2003, down from 2,013 persons wounded the year before.

In the revised report, that number has jumped to 3646 persons, more than twice the earlier figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Were these reports created to make bush* believe terrorism
was indeed going down??? You know, the Plausable Deniability thing? Maybe the 'mistake' was to show bush* his GREAT war was working...and since he NEVER READS why would his REIGHT WING tell him that they had to change the numbers???

I could argue with ALL the CHANGES that have occured since this POS hss occupied MY whitehouse??? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It might have been to deceive our illiterate President, but it was
designed specifically to deceive the public.

To paraphrase Jon Stewert, when it's off by a few numbers, it's an honest mistake. When it's off by hundreds or thousands, you're fucking lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. delete
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 07:32 PM by Fenris
fucking slow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush: Reality and all the evidence is wrong. I am right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. And what kind of fucking moron "thought the world was calm"?
Blue-blood upper class POS politician's sons, that's who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carpetbagger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. He needs to see F911.
He'll find out a lot about what happened during his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. How do you respond to something like that?
The Chimp is brain damaged or something. He's been exposed as a fraud yet he clings to the lie. How I would love to be a fly on the wall during his meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. B*sh: Hitting Hornet Nest With Rocks Not Cause of Incredibly Painful Welts
Proof once more that this man has absolutely no logic circuits in that pitiful coke-addled excuse for a brain he's got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC