Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bush going to be in danger when he goes to Baghdad next week?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is Bush going to be in danger when he goes to Baghdad next week?
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 04:24 PM by GreenPartyVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll be fine
it's the Iraqi civilians and US troops who are in more danger because of W, even when he's not there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Yep. Champagne Guard Unit silver spoon AWOL frathead
never had to worry about a thing. June 30 will be no different than the previous 30 thousand days of his vile existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, I edited to add the cancellation option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deepcover Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. not yet
* won't have a problem until after the election and he is booted. the world court will then declares him a war criminal and foreign travel will be dicey on chance of arrest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Welcome to DU :^)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who cares?
I'm not going to wish ill things on the man. He is, after all, our only President, as Molly Ivins would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, super tin-foil hat...
the man's become a liability to the ruling oligarchs. If he's killed in Baghdad, his death helps the republicans get back into office, both because they've unloaded the liability & because they can pretend he's a war hero. How's that one, conspiracy buffs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I never wear ANY type of hat...
but I find your theory VERY credible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Sounds reasonable to me
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 02:44 PM by smirkymonkey
:tinfoilhat:

I'm serious, you know. The timing couldn't be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. no regular Iraqis will be anywhere near him
He will be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No regular GIs either. They might wanna frag him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Techumsah's curse--every president elected in a year ending in
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 04:57 PM by mistertrickster
zero has died or been assassinated, starting with Lincoln.

1860, 1864 Lincoln (shot and killed)
1880, James Garfield (shot and killed)
1896, 1900 William McKinley (shot and killed)
1920, Warren G. Harding (died in office)
1940, FDR (died in office)
1960, JFK (shot and killed)
1980, 1984 Reagan (shot at, almost killed)

Reagan, elected in 1980, apparently beat the curse--however, it was obvious that toward the end the Alzheimer's was catching up with him.
So he lived, but his brain died, if you can call that "living."

Still, perhaps the curse only lasted 100 years . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. That's one weird series of coincidences
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. He might get pricked buy a thorn off of all those roses they toss!
Ever wonder, where they get all those damned roses in a bombed out, burned out desert?

A photo op like that, will cost the taxpayers more than the "Clinton Investigation" cost us! It could very well get a bunch of US soldiers killed too, if things get crazy! Besides, the troops have plenty of rubber turkey from last year! Shrub going to Baghdad in broad daylight and telling the guys he's coming, could lead to a needless blood bath, to match his needless takeover of that country! If Dumbya really supports the troops, why would he take a chance like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe he can be president of Iraq after this year. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That would work!
But that would mean Iraq would never be a democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. He'll just fly in at nights with the lights off......with a plastic turkey
And you won't know about it until he's already left....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. He's been flying with his lights off all his life!
In other words, he don't have both oars in the water!

I'll answer my own question, that I asked above:

Q. "Why would Bush take a chance like that?"

A. Because he "PLAYS POLITICS" 24/7 and he could care less who it hurts or what it costs, as long as it don't hurt him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. He won't go into Baghdad...
He'll go into the "safe" areas in the North or into the Basra area, from Kuwait, perhaps. I will be surprised if he goes into Baghdad because, in his heart, he is really a big chicken shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elf Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. He will not go there
After Turkey and all that security problems he will send somebody else!

If he goes, I would think differently about him.
Then he really might be the scapegoat for somebody else like Cheney and his cunta.

He just can't go there, it will be not manageable for his SS>

But I might be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Do you think Cheney would actually go?
I bet he'd send Powell in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
21. I think Bush going to Baghdad is simply insane.
Not that I have great love for the guy, but isn't this taking the "Bring it on" message over the top?

Bush notwithstanding, I just don't think any US President should be in Iraq right now or at any time in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
22. The fact Bush*
is making an advertised visit to Iraq proves (to me) he knows for certain that there ARE NO WMDs there.

One a them there nukes he so fears is not there.

IMHO...180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Since when is Bush going to Baghdad next week???
Sorry, got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I think the idea was first floated around last year by the admin
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 02:14 PM by GreenPartyVoter
"What kind of Iraq will George Bush see when he comes here next week to celebrate the handover of sovereignty to the country's new interim government? It will certainly not be the scene that Karl Rove, the White House political adviser, must have hoped for when he hatched the idea last autumn of bringing his boss into the heart of downtown Baghdad for the ceremony."

snip

"The Bush visit has not been announced, and may yet be cancelled for security reasons, leaving Colin Powell, the secretary of state, or perhaps not even him, to come in the president's place. But like clues in a treasure hunt, telltale hints of the Bush/Rove plan are there for the finding."

full story: http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0625-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC