Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok-- so why was Putin against the U.S. invading Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:39 PM
Original message
Ok-- so why was Putin against the U.S. invading Iraq
after HE tipped us off that Saddam was planning to attack us?

Anyone want to take a crack at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's lying for Bush?
Funny there was no connection between Putin and Bush prior to his meeting with Bush at G8 conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Exactly what I was thinking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nose pin Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to take a crack.....
But I don't want to get my face all scratched up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Oh, Nose pin
I'm actually a sweetheart once you get to know me }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nose pin Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. OK then, here goes
Loonman alludes to part of it (billion dollar oil deal).

Add to that that Russia figured prominently in the oil for food scam.

Add to that a possible deal with shrub to help Russia out with said oil for food scam.

A combination of financial interest and saving face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. good points
however, since Chalabi won't release the details of the "Food for Oil Scam", I'll have to reserve judgment on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think that report is bullshit
Putin had a billion dollar oil deal about to go through with Iraq until Bush invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where's the evidence?
During the Cuban missile crisis, we showed the world our evidence. I'd change my position and support the war *if* I had knowledge and not hearsay Iraq was coordinating terror attacks against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do you have to use logic?
You know that we are not suppose to understand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL
:D

My bad!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder if Bush didn't promise Putin something in return for taking
some of the heat off of Bush? Oil deal maybe? Look for clues over the next few days/weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. At least one of Putin's cabinet members dispute him it seems.
From UPI article from March 2003:

Russian Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin said he was astonished by a U.S. request to freeze Iraqi bank assets.

"Under our legislation, we can freeze accounts if they are used to finance terrorism or money laundering activities," Kudrin said. "As far as I am aware, there are no facts linking Saddam Hussein's accounts in Russia to such activities."


http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030321-022040-6046r

------------------------

So Russia was resisting, in March 2003, shutting down Saddam Hussein's accounts held there because they didn't believe he was financing terrorism.

'Splain that, Pooty Poot.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Damn, you're on the ball!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If I can google it up, why can't the press?
Oh wait, I forgot . . . because they are effing WORTHLESS.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nose pin Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. You know they'll counter this one
In a post-KGB government (highly compartmentalized intelligence), would a finance minister be privvy to such intelligence?

Wouldn't locking these accounts stop the flow of legitimate and illegitimate funds into Russia?

You can expect those two at least to be the response. We have to find a counter-counter argument to fill those holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Actually why would the Finance Minister be out of the loop?
Wouldn't you want your finance minister to know which countries might be financing international terrorism with monies held in the country?

It seems grossly stupid for them to try to say they weren't keeping their Finance Minister informed of possible accounts for terrorist funding!

The Finance Minister said there was no evidence of such ties. Not even a "well, we've been keeping our eye on that."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nose pin Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. good point (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. $$$ He was afraid that if we had control of the reigns
Iraq's debt to the Russia would be forgiven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. Aha, this is why I signed on today..ole Pooty Poot is
back peddling???????????????????????? I'm going to read all your posts to see what ya'll have to say. I'm thinking this isn't a good thing.

My first thought this morning, what with a beheading in SA, then Putin's statement, is that bush might win.

The whole area over there is falling apart and there's kidnappers whacking all sorts of people outside of the battle arena...if you look at this through the eyes of the general public, you might find that folks are saying 'omg, they're coming to get us--now even Putin says so' 'we've got to stay the course and go kick some ass'...stuff like that. I'm worried.

Somebody, puh lease, disabuse me of this idea lest I never sleep again. :hangover:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. He'll be getting paid for saying this. Payment in the form of
contracts in Iraq? Follow the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. 1. There was never a tip-off. This was made up now
Edited on Fri Jun-18-04 02:09 PM by Capt_Nemo
2. Putin opposes PNAC's objectives. He knows way down the line they would eventualy come after Russia.

3. Putin discovered in the last 2 years that not only PNAC is not
feasible but is counterproductive: it is speeding up the demise
of the superpower. The war in Iraq exposed the limits of US military
power, and no one is watching this more closely than Russia and China.

4. Putin discovered in the last 2 years that while the unholy alliance
of PNACers and Xian fundies holds the reins of the administration,
Russia's influence on the world stage (specialy in Western Europe
and Asia) will rise, for the countries that feel threatened by
PNAC (France, Germany, China, among others) find reassurance against
any crazy neocon action in Russia's strategic deterrent.
Joseph Nye would say that the presence of the bushies in the WH
boosts Russia's "soft power".

5. Putin is afraid that "regime change" this comming November would
mean Chirac and Schroeder cozying up to Kerry leaving him in the
cold and resurecting NATO. Putin is afraid of Brzezinsky again crawling up and down the Caucasus and Central Asia - Putin knows that
Democrats are COMPETENT imperialists. Putin is afraid of a less anxious China
slowing down the transfer of russian military technology and the
acquisition of russian weapons (= cash).

5. Putin doesn't give a shit about the so-called "oil for food scam".
Even if there was something to it (I have my doubts) such an affair
would only be a scandal in a country like France where the UN is
seen as all about the rule of international law. In Russia the UN
is seen as a mean to exert russian influence in world affairs. If
some shady deals were exposed the russian people most probably would
cheer on the way they fooled the US and the UK and made a load of
bucks in the process.

6. The WH must be scared shitless by the sudden questioning of the
war rationale all over the mainstream media since the 911 commission
report. They needed support from someone other than the usual
suspects. So they asked Putin to "rescue" them, most likely in
exchange for some Iraqi oil concession, to which he most gladly
responded, for he knows that propping up bush will most likely
deliver him his most cherished geopolitical goal:
The colapse of american power under its own weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Didn't Poppy visit
Putin a few months back? They must have made some sort of a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. bump!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think he's doing Smirk a solid
A one hand washes the other scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC