Last Wednesday, I was listening to Marketplace (produced by PRI) on my NPR affiliate. They did a story on how the telephone companies make millions from prison telephone calls.
This story related all the hallmarks of the insanity of late capitalism. No longer is making money (if it ever was) about competitors competing for business on a level playing field in a marketplace where consumers have a choice.
What the story was about was the way politically connected companies get contracts to provide outgoing phone services in municipalities with huge prison populations. You can only make collect calls out of prisons -- and legislatures aren't about to change the law to help families of the MILLIONS of prisoners we stick in prison save money. So once you have your legislated monopoly, you get your captive audience, and you force them to buy your goods. Welcome to the end days of capitalism!
Here's the story:
http://marketplace.publicradio.org/shows/2004/05/26_mpp.html ("Phone Prisoners" -- scroll down).
Today, I read this story:
http://biz.yahoo.com/law/040528/f2ab5ace5ffaa0bbe27a0ed4f14d526a_1.html. Guess what? Lawyers are finding charges on their phone bills for calls from their clients in prison that they never received. Hmmm. The easy profits weren't enough for the phone companies from the quasi-legal sources, so now they're trying to get even more profits by sticking fraudulent charges into the bills of customers they think are least likely to notice them?
Here's a great quote from the article about the suit:
At the center of the dispute is how collect calling works at prisons and county jails. However, the technology used to run jailhouse phone systems is a closely guarded secret. As a result, many case documents in Condes have been put under seal. In addition to a protective order, some documents have been marked for "attorneys' eyes only" to prevent defense attorneys, for example, from passing along a rival phone company's trade secrets to a client. In fact, plaintiffs attorneys declined to describe how the collect calls work because doing so might violate protective orders in the case. Triple fucing "hmmm."
Curious about how wide spread the outrage over this issue (which is clearly worth a lot of money to the telecoms and is bleeding a lot of people dry) I did a google search. I came up with these links:
http://www.curenational.org/new/highbills.html and
http://www.prisoners.com/greedatt.html . A priest wrote the second one, which is critical of AT&T.
Now, all this triggered another memory for me. Back when the Iraq War started, I remember there was a big "support the soldiers" push to get people to buy them phone cards, and it was reported that the US Army does not give the soldiers free telephone service to call people back in the US.
Hmmm, again. Late capitalism: politicians create profits for corporations by taking a captive audience, separating them from goods and services they can't get in a competitive marketplace, and then stick their preferred party donor in that marketplace as the only provider. Voila! Profits.
A sense of outrage, anyone?
Wasn't the damn Telecom Bill enough for these companies to make a profit? Must politicians also destroy all competion and choice in the marketplace too?
Also makes you wonder if we're putting people in jail and sending soldiers overseas in order to make profits for these companies. (Well, that one's actually pretty obvious. You don't have to wonder.)