Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's why the Rethugs control all three branches:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 08:51 AM
Original message
Here's why the Rethugs control all three branches:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-sen21.html

SPRINGFIELD -- For the past 10 days, U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama hasn't been able to go to the bathroom or talk to his wife on his cell phone without having a camera-toting political gofer from his Republican rival filming a few feet away...

It means Warfel follows Obama as he moves from meeting to meeting in the Capitol. And it means Warfel tails Obama when he drives to his campaign office...

Warfel interrupted Obama several times with heckling questions, but wouldn't respond when reporters asked him about who he was and why he was filming Obama's every move...."

The Dem response? Correctly pointing out that the filming is smarmy as hell. In other word, the Dem usual, whining at GOP thuggery from the moral high ground.

Compare that story with this one:

http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=29122

WASHINGTON - President Bush's campaign yesterday threatened to hold four days of campaign rallies to yank the media spotlight from Boston's Democratic National Convention if Sen. John F. Kerry delays accepting his party's nomination.

"Certainly, we would give strong consideration that there be (Bush) rallies all four nights of their four-day political rally in Boston, should Kerry decide to delay his nomination," said Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt.


Why doesn't the first story read, "In response to Warfel's videotaping, the Obama campaign has hired some cinematographers of their own. Three camera operators will not only follow and film Ryan, but also his wife, Bertha, and his college age daughter, Hilda..."?

The GOP doesn't care about the moral high ground. They care only about winning. Here's something for the in-charge dems to consider: The real moral high ground is secured when we are in power thwarting the GOP agenda. Let's do what we need to do to win.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Daschle, our feckless leader, is a p*ssy
I heard him on NPR this morning. Bill Frist has broken all Senate protocol and precedent, and has begun campaigning AGAINST Daschle in SD, for Daschle's Republican opponent. The rules of the game have always been that of decorum in the Senate, and you don't directly attack your fellow Senators, or campaign against them. Frist steps up to the plate and said, "screw tradition! Politics is hardball" (paraphrased). Senator Byrd gives a compelling speech about the grand tradition of the Senate, and how Frist is basically vile scum for changing hundreds of year of "rules" simply to advance his own political agenda.

What does Daschle say? Something to the effect that "Well, I find it unfortunate Mr. Frist feels that way." End of story.

Donkey's may have bigger dicks, but elephants certainly have the bigger balls!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Daschle doesn't want anymore anthrax sent through his mail
That's why he's afraid - he's got family. I'd be afraid too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddzilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. then he should resign
and let someone with a fucking set run the show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Matthew 16:26

He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Friedrich Nietzsche

The Democratic party could win by adopting Republican positions; but I assume we all think that's a bad idea. So why do we think it's a good idea to adopt corrupt Republican strategies? I'm not suggesting we don't fight the Republicans. But let's fight them where they are weakest--the failures of the neo-conservative movements policies (as enacted by President Bush). Let's show how their policies have failed, and why they have failed.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Political positions are not the same political strategies.
First off, we couldn't win by mimicking rethug positions since most people agree with us. The reason we've been losing despite that fact is because the GOP does what it takes to win while we quote Matthew.

In America 2004 policies are the end. Strategy is the means. You don't get to implement the policy if you get beaten. We can either have the moral high ground and lose, or win and then pass moral legislation. Which do you prefer?

The moral thing to do is get the GOP out of power, and to do that we have to win elections, even if we have to match their meanness.

Elections are not for the squeamish, never have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I'd rather hold the Moral High Ground and win
You seem to be positing that holding the Moral High Ground is a synonym for failure (which is better than the usually argument that holding the moral high ground is a synonym for giving in to the Republicans).

Why can't we come up with a vigorous strategy that wins without having to stoop to this level of harrassment? Particularly with the Bush Economic and Foreign Policy in such obvious shambles?

Why also, don't we trumpet the sleazy tricks our opponents get up to. I mean if we are both in the mud, that doesn't work. But if we stay, as much as possible, out of the mud, than we can point out their rat-bastard-ness all day long.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I agree. Although the moral high ground lends itself to failure
when elections are concerned, especially if your opponents will stop at absolutely nada to win.

I was once at a meeting at which NC Gov. Jim Hunt, who had one a record four terms as NC governor, said something that stuck with me:

A dem candidate had been getting attacked mericelessly by his opponent. After finally responding to the attcks in kind, the Dem was now ahead. A well-intentioned staffter for that candidate said, "Now we can maybe let up on the counterattacks a little."

"No," said Hunt, "Now you step on his throat and push hard." They did, and they won.

The last time the Dems did a full bore counteroffensive was '98-99, during impeachement. We played it just as tough as the GOP, and we won that one too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. We don't need moral high ground. We need genuine morality.
But there's no reason why we should give in to Republican thuggery, either. Personally, I'd like to see Obama play this up in the news: talk calmly about how the guy is stalking him (point him out often to reporters); give him a little "hello" wave before every speech; mention with a little laugh how he likes to follow him into the toilet; follow this last with wondering (almost, but not quite, under his breath) what the guy's real interests are.

Guarantee you, the camera will disappear. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. John H, I agree with you.
Being nice does not win elections. People don't really want a politician in office with whom they can have a beer. They want someone who will DO WHAT IT TAKES to represent and fight for them.

Right now we are woefully short of those who will FIGHT and FIGHT HARD for working people. Saying PLEASE to the ruling class DOES NOTHING. The ruling class just laughs and says, F-you and goes about their business of subverting the rights of workers.

The reason we have what few rights we do have left is because people TOOK TO THE STREETS back in the day. If the civil rights and labor rights movements were left up to the Americans of today, we'd still be working 60-70 hours a week with no weekends and no overtime (some do already work these kinds of hours) and blacks would not have the right to vote.

I don't think Dems and progressives need to exactly mimic the tactics of the right-wing but it sure would be nice if some spine and intestinal fortitude were exhibited on a very regular basis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't that stalking?
File charges against the guy when he follows you around in a state with anti-stalking laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. A repub politician here in PA had a Democrat stalked...and he lost
because people thought it was disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's psychological warfare. Make Obama be too careful, stilted.
You can't count on the voters' disgust to win. If that worked more often than not, there wouldn't be a rethug in power. The Dems should stop the stalking now, and the most efficient way to do it is to give Ryan a taste of his own medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ryan has already apologized
Obama's comments in the story in the original post were perfect. He personalized it in a way that made Ryan look terrible.

Ryan's campaign came out and apologized and said they were removing the stalker.

To me, Obama handled it exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The words didn't really work though, did they?
Edited on Mon May-24-04 09:57 AM by John_H
The stalker has not been removed, only "pulled back" to a "comfortable" distance.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/roeper/cst-nws-roep24.html

Want to make it stop altogether? Start filming Ryan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I Didn't See That - Thanks
yeks. I like the line about Ryan's own concerns about privacy and wanting to keep his divorce records private. Ryan keeps getting bad press from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Your point is well taken, though. The candidate should rise above.
Obama should distance himself from any attempt to retaliate, perhaps. Let an organization, Filmmakers for Fairness maybe, do the stalking. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimchi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Start filming the stalker! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Let's do what we need to do to win"
Great, so are you going to pay for it?

Do you know how much to costs to hire a full-time cinematographer for every repuke who is running for office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'd do it only when they do it to us n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. They are going to keep pushing Free America until...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Obama campaign
should find a way to play this situation up so as to make his opponent look ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. I say fight fire with fire!
You can't win a war by fighting bombs with stones. I've said this for a long time now, and most of you have too when you say the Dems have no ba**s, or they just roll over and play dead.

I don't necessarily believe the end justifies the means, but you must fight the enemy with equal opposing force!

Forget this moral high ground stuff. Obama shouldn't do most of it himself. Get some surrogates to do the dirty work, but you gotta do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC