Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's with the news media assuming a * second term?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:39 PM
Original message
What's with the news media assuming a * second term?
Today on MTP, Russert was talking to Robin Wright about Colin Powell. He asked, "Do you think Powell will really resign by the end of the year?" She replied, "Yes, he was always a one-term Secretary of State." HELLO!!! There's an election in November!!! This is about the third time in a week that I have seen the press totally jump over the election talking about Bush's second term like it's a done deal. Do they know something we don't know? If not, we need to start writing these "news" people every time they do this reminding them that this is an election year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. stand up and holler!!
The time to do it is not the next time.

It is NOW. NOW. NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sent email to MTP
Here's what I wrote:
To whom it may concern:

I was watching today's MTP, and I noticed a biased assumption that bothered me greatly. Here's the transcript:

MR. RUSSERT: But he stays on through the end of the year?

MS. WRIGHT: I think he stays on through the end of the year. I think it's always been the case he was a one-term secretary of state. It's a tough job. He didn't particularly want it in the first place. I don't think he's going to go because of Iraq, but I think he'll be glad to get out because of Iraq.

This is an election year. As of right now, the race between President Bush and Senator Kerry is a very close one. In fact, Kerry is leading in many of the polls. With the present situation in Iraq, the scandal of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, questions concerning what the administration did or did not know prior to 9/11, and various other inconsistencies in what this administration has told the Congress, the UN, and the American people, I feel it is very irresponsible journalism for a national news program to pose a question which assumes a Bush reelection. The question which immediately sprang to my mind was, "Do they know something I don't know?" With the dubious means Bush used to position himself in the White House in 2000, I am aware that this election many not be decided by the people. The purging of voter registration rolls by Jeb Bush has once again begun in Florida. The Diebold voting systems adopted across the country make manual recounts nearly an impossibility. I just have to wonder when I see members of the press discussing a second Bush administration as if it is already a done deal. We say we are in Iraq to bring democracy to the Iraqi people, but with statements that ignore that this is an election year, I have to stop and ask myself, if what we really need is to be bringing democracy back to America?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's all part of the repug strategy
of protecting a weak unelected president. Talk like the election is a forgone conclusion, or that it'll be another squeaker. Numb the middle voters. Reasure them it's ok to vote repug again. Keep the middle in a trance until December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Russert has forgotten that the American voters
will be making this decision moot come November. If he waits that long, Powell won't have a chance to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, the American voters didn't get to decide the last election. .
That's for damn sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC