Do you think Al Qaeda will strike near the election?

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

Just curious as to what everybody thinks about this.

[corriger]

1. add another row

such do you think the americans goverment will allow another strike.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

3. Oops

That's what option 9 was supposed to say, more or less. I need to fix it.

Edit: Done. Recombobulated option 9 to say what it was supposed to say originally.

[Norquist Nemesis]

2. Oops!

I meant to vote No...Shrub will. :/

[Skip Intro]

4. Not the same as asking "will there be an "attack" near the election

Or "will there be an attack that gets blamed on aq?"

But don't mind me, I think aq just might be a needed enemy of a radical gang of criminals who require a new all-purpose evil to grow their power.

Did you see that Nick Berg video?

:scared:

"I just hope they don't come over here."

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

7. So did Bush stage the attack on the USS Cole, too?

What about the '93 WTC bombing?

[Skip Intro]

10. >

Can you say absolutely, positively not?

I expressed doubt and suspiciion.

Would they - the bush regime - slaughter thousands upon thousands for mere lies? If you don't know the answer to that, you should open your eyes. Where it starts or where it stops, I wish I knew.

[Cessna Invesco Palin]

11. .

>Can you say absolutely, positively not?

Yes.

[No2W2004]

5. The shrubsters will see to it

That some kind of attack will happen close to Shrubapalooza so they can try and whup up the most "patriotic" blood-lust frenzy.

[ibegurpard]

6. Undoubtedly.

Bush needs a Reichstag badly.

[Anarcho-Socialist]

9. Night of broken glass

I believe Al-Qaedia will attack around the Olympic Games, in Greece or elsewhere. At a time of nationalistic outpouring, it may well benefit Bush* heavily.

[ForrestGump]

12. My first thought, too, was that I'd hate to be

running security at the Olympics tyhis year. Not that it's not always a worry, but the world's an awful lot more in turmoil this year than it was in '72.

[ForrestGump]

13. My first thought, too, was that I'd hate to be

running security at the Olympics tyhis year. Not that it's not always a worry, but the world's an awful lot more in turmoil this year than it was in '72.

[j1607760]

8. The Neo-cons are hoping for a terrorists attack to save Bush

You should hear what these lunatics are saying on right-wing hate-radio. When talking about what to do about the Bush crises (gas prices, Abu-Ghraib, Iraq, unemployment etc.) they aren't talking about finding solutions, all they want is a distraction. Listen to them and all they ever say is, "Another terrorist attack and Abu-Ghraib would be knocked right off the front pages." That's not idle speculation on their part either, it's wishful thinking. This is what the neo-Cons have been reduced to: hoping Americans die, and in large numbers, in order to distract people from the mess they made. This is a good sign. It means the neo-cons have given up. They've accepted that they can't solve the mess W's made in time for the election so now what they want is a distraction.