Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Favorite US President, 1789-1845

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:17 PM
Original message
Poll question: Favorite US President, 1789-1845
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:25 PM by ih8thegop
The top two from each poll go to the final round, sometime early in the week, UNLESS someone gets 50%, in which case they go to the final round all by themselves.

All terms started and ended in March (that's when inauguration day was back then), unless otherwise noted.

(F)=Federalists
(DR)=Democratic-Republican
(D)=Democratic
(W)=Whig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who voted for Jackson and why?
Was it because of his stance against centralized money power? I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some Klansmen.
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:28 PM by genius
As a Demoocrat, I'm kind of embarrased about having a slave-trader and an Indian-slaughterer in my party. Did Jackson do anything decent besides win a battle in the War of 1812 after the treaty was signed. On second thought, that was a blooper on his part too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How could you not vote for Harrison?
He dd nothing wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You mean because he died before he could mess up the country?
He was an Indian fighter too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Tippecanoe and Tyler too!
Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Unfair!! Judged by todays standards on issues, none of these men pass
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:41 PM by Rowdyboy
the smell test. Its absurd to expect them to be pure during a period when slave trading and Indian slaughtering were acceptable behavior in general society, strongly encouraged by both the government and the people. Of course we don't accept such behavior today. What has that got to do with anything?

Is Jefferson, the greatest genius of the Revolution, evil because he was a slave owner? Washington?

Jackson's accomplishments as a fighter against the business and banking elite earn him respect as an American president. His populist appeal was unquestioned and he was a totally appropriate representative of the people for that period.

Most important of all, Jackson, like Gore, had an election stolen from him by the business elite. In 1824, Jackson lead a 4 man field easily, but the eastern elite used the electoral college to steal the election for the son of an ex-president-John Quincey Adams. Adams only served one term before Jackson came back and kicked the living shit out of him. Sent him back to Boston, so to say.

Sound familiar?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I don't disagree with all that...

But, I wouldn't be so hard on JQ Adams, especially not to the extent of making a comparison between him and the Shrub.

Adams was an ineffective President, in part because of the justifiable outrage over how he got elected. But he was one of the nation's best Secretaries of State under Monroe. As a Congressman after his Presidency, he almost single-handedly led the battle against the Gag Rule that effectively denied abolitionists from exercising their constitutional right of petitioning the government. He was one of the few brave enough to stand up against the slave power. "...though the heavens fall, let it come..." He was an amazing orator too.

I highly suspect that if Shrub had been in his position, he would have been the one that argued in favor of instituting the Gag Rule.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He was the founder of our party
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:32 PM by mot78
The Democratic Party was created in reaction to the Corrupt Bargain of 1824, where Henry Clay pledged to give his Electoral College votes to Adams in exchange for being appointed Sec of State. This pissed off Jackson, who had a plurality of the popular vote AND Electoral College votes, and resulted in a new party being formed for the purpose of getting him elected in 1828. Ironic though, because the Democrats were originally the anti-big government, white power RWers that we now detest, while the Whigs were the party of big government and to a lesser extent, the Abolitionist/Free Soiler Movement, and their programs and views of the Federal Government ultimately won the day (with the irse of Whiggish programs passed under Lincoln, the Progressive Era, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Jefferson founded our party. Jackson just shortened the name.
He probably couldn't pronounce names that long. The name was originally the Democratic-Republican Party. Lately, publishers have been trying to change history by inaccurately calling it the "Republican" Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's been happening for a long time...

It's not a new phenomenon.

Both parties have long claimed Jefferson as their ideological founder, partly because his positions on various things are often outwardly contradictory and can be spun in support of various positions.

For all the bad press that Jackson, imo deservedly, receives, a great deal of it could apply just as easily to Jefferson.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sorry. We have direct links to Jefferson. The Repubs are from the Feds
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:44 PM by genius
When I was in school, the history books used the full name of Democratic-Republican.

The Republicans traced their roots back to the Whigs and the Whigs traced their roots back to the Federalists.

The good news about Jefferson is that he tried to list slavery as one of the King's attrocities in the Declaration of Independence.

Don't let the names confuse you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. But the Whigs were not just ex-Feds
Many of them, like Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, were DR's. THe fact that the DR's were the only party during the post-1812 Era of Good Feeling amde them, perhaps the only "big-tent" party in history, where factions of every political spectrum belonged. All of the candidates in the 1824 Elections were DR's, including Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I'm not confused...

Read Michael Holt's The Rise and Fall of the Whig Party. Whigs claimed Jefferson just as loudly as the Democrats.

Everyone can trace their roots to the Democratic-Republicans because, as Mot78 said, during the first couple decades of the 18th century, everyone was a Democratic-Republican.

In any case, I don't doubt the books you used in school used the full name. So did mine. Books today still use the full name. However, some books have always shortened the name to either Democrats or Republicans as well, sometimes due to an author's personal preference, sometimes for other reasons, some valid, some rather arbitrary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Text books today call the DR's "Jeffersonians" or
Jeffersionian Republicans. If you want to look at politics today, this country has become really partisan, in a way not seen since the heyday of Jacksonian Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Some do, yes...

Although, in this context, "republican" refers to the particular concept of "republicanism" as a form of government, not a political ideology per se.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's not correct
In 1824, the only political party was the Democratic-Republican party, which was founded by Jefferson, and the states-rights Anti-Federalists that originally formed to oppose the Constitution and campaign for a Bill of Rights. The Federalists gradually died off, and the DR's was the only party standing. Because of this, they encompassed every possible political faction, with big government and abolitionist types like Henry Clay and Daniel Webster, to small, pro-slavery people like John C. Calhoun and Jackson. Jackson and his supporters founded the Democratic Party as a soapbox for Jackson's White House bid, and to advance the Southern-Western frontier agenda of small government. The Remaining DR's became the "National Republicans" briefly, but became the Whigs in reaction to Jackson killing off the Bank of the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Here's a good way of explaing this
Edited on Sat May-22-04 07:48 PM by mot78
Nevermind, I can't post it properly.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Isnt it interesting
That one of the greatest most truly democratic and popular (to us) presidents came directly after one of the most right-wing fascistic anti-constitutional presidents ever.
W is a soul mate of Adams with his sedition act and his love of jailing dissenters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I gave Tyler a vote
Not because he was a great president, or even that good of a president, but because of what he did to assure that the executive branch couldn't be co-opted by party leaders.

When Harrison croaked, the Whigs all assumed that Tyler would pretty much let Henry Clay and the Whig leadership run things. They considered Tyler as an "Interim President" or as just a caretaker. Tyler had the balls to stand up to Clay & the Whigs and established himself as POTUS. No * after his name. It set an important precedent that was much more important when Andrew Johnson was battling the Radical Republican congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Tyler was an example of ideological purity vs. pragmatism
Tyler and Jonhson are reasons why people don't want McCain as Veep. If Kerry got shot and McCain took over, he would be battling Congress non-stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Interesting thought - but I still think Jefferson's sexier.
There, I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's talk about Jefferson!
Edited on Sat May-22-04 08:01 PM by ih8thegop
The replies thus far have been about Jackson, but T.J. has a lot of votes so far.

Which makes sense - you know, Declaration of Independence, Louisiana Purchase, diplomat, etc.

So... What do you like most about Jefferson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. And for that matter, why is Madison getting ignored? -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Yeah, I kind of like Madison, too.
He did play an important role in writing the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. T.J. has done stuff that both Liberals and COnservative applaud
He cut defense spending drastically, believing that a militant foreign policy was bad for America, and opposed Adam's Alien and Sedtion Acts, which were kind of like the Patriot Act in their day.
He was for small government in general though, and detested urban values (which many RWers do today).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Someone resurrect Jefferson!
He would be Bush's Public Enemy #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. What I like about TJ

I like TJ the intellectual philosopher and radical reformer.

I have questions about his personal life, financial sensibilities, and record as President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kick
Edited on Sun May-23-04 03:13 PM by ih8thegop
55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. and no votes for James Monroe
You'd think having a Doctrine named after him would warrant something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Hi Charlie Brown!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Madison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yeah, he's underrated. (nt)
Edited on Sun May-23-04 03:41 PM by ih8thegop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Just remember Washington freed his slaves
What was Jefferson's reason not to? Didn't at least one of his daughters die? Who were his heirs.

Also Federalism rules the Jeffersonian naive and quaint agrarian vision was not in synch with the upcoming industrialization of America and in any case much of the opposition to federalism and powers over monetary debt involved protection of the Virginian land owner class of which he was a propertied elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Jefferson's slaves...

Jefferson's slaves were sold to pay his enormous debts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. can I vote for the first six?
I wouldn't be too embarrassed to have any of the first six around today. If I had to pick one, I'd go with John Quincy Adams, not so much for what he did as president but for his work as secretary of state and later in the House.

Yeah, they all got their warts, but they managed to keep the country more or less working during the first crucial decades.

linda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. Washington.
He stepped down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC