Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wedding Massacre ===> Upcoming Distraction from Fox/Rove?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
taquinas101 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:02 PM
Original message
Wedding Massacre ===> Upcoming Distraction from Fox/Rove?
The wedding massacre is terrible news, which has almost always been followed with a feel-good/they-deserve-it story from Fox/Rove. So, will it be:

1. A gruesome videotaped atrocity followed by commentary from right wing pundits suggesting that the Iraqis got what they deserved?
2. A "WMD FOUND STORY!" on Fox with the "Report of accidental shooting at wedding" relegated to the back page?
3. Hyping up the celebrity terrorist/member of Saddam Regime of the moment (Al Sadr, Al Zawari, etc.), then announce that he has been captured/killed!
4. A bombing followed by the standard "They hate our freedom" speech by Bush and company.
5. Announce discovery of secret documents and photos of deal between Saddam Hussein, Bin Ladin and Hitler's great-grand nephew to terrorize the world. Soldier on the ground will say, "We occupied Saddam's palace for over a year, but we never thought to look under the sofa, but there was the documents!"

Which one do you think it will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've already heard on CNN that is wasn't a wedding party
but was a gathering of insurgents and they got what they deserved.

Yep, the "wedding party" side of the attack is alreay going down the memory hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They'll never explain away the dead children and women
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I heard that too! They were quick to spin that one.
CNN is soviet pravda at its worst. I cant believe that they did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. None of the above
A) Powell resigns and airs all his dirty laundry about Bush.
B) Rumsfeld is fired.
C) Cheney has another heart attack and is reduced to a drooling sack of skin.
D) Bush is caught in a compromising situation with Rice and is later found in a cocaine induced coma.
E) Republicans nationwide drink the kool-aid.

But then I'm ever the optimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. LOL!
The funniest part is, it all sounds very probable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. C) has a lot of promise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Where is Cheney?
He hasn't been seen lately.

For all we know, he's already dead and buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They don't bury their dead
They eat them. Tasts like shit too I hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lin Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seems to be a new option:The "ain't no
big deal when you think of the greater good PLUS it WAS an accident, Sheesh!" attitude. That's the incredibly untactful, unfeeling, almost casual way Shep Smith talked about this tragedy whilst he was yapping with Pentagon reporter Bret (Beir?)

No biggie is what they projected fear not (plenty) Gibson/Hume/O'Reilly will show the way:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The answer is . . .
old footage showing Baathist abuses. That way, they can justify the war, make US war crimes seem less appalling, and distract from the current bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC