Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sivits Wept

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:03 PM
Original message
Sivits Wept
BAGHDAD, Iraq(AP) Spc. Jeremy C. Sivits wept and apologized after receiving the maximum penalty of a year in prison and a bad conduct discharge Wednesday in the first court-martial stemming from abuse of Iraqis at the Abu Ghraib prison.

His testimony will now be used to prosecute other Americans accused of mistreating prisoners most immediately, three men from his reserve unit who also appeared in court Wednesday.

Sivits pleaded guilty to four counts for taking pictures of naked Iraqi prisoners being humiliated, including some of the photographs that triggered the abuse scandal and sparked international outrage when they were broadcast and published last month.

"I'd like to apologize to the Iraqi people and those detainees," Sivits said, breaking into tears. "I should have protected those detainees, not taken the photos."
.........................................................

when he was sentenced to one year and kicked down to private, j.c. sivits cried a real tear. a tear from a man who smiled and enjoyed punching prisoners of war in the chest and head so hard he almost killed them.

jesus wept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. "those detainees"
gee, couldn't he have said "those people"?

oh, right, I forgot. They're Iraqis, not people. My bad.

/bitter sarcasm off/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does he got to Military prison?
Do those in military prison abuse each other like they do in regular penetentiaries? Will he be someone's bitch? Karma is a bitch sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestmoi Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Karma is bitch sometime" should be framed. thanx for the laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No problem
and a very big welcome to DU :hi:!!!

I really slaughtered the spelling in that post though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Say what you will. Sivits blew the whistle
Which pretty much guaranteed him getting the maximum penalty forblowing the whistle.

Watch what happens to the others. You think Ms. England will get the max penalty?

No way. because she didn't commit the much more serious (in Bushevik eyes, that is) crime of blowing the whistle.

Watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. they HATE whistleblowers
o'niel, clarke, bushway or the hiway. last week i saw two army soldiers, one female, one male, say that they were in charge of prisoners, and in burst hooded men claiming to be a secret squad with clearance to take any prisoner to room 1A. the officers stopped the unidentified americans and they left. after that, both officers were written up on prisoner abuse charges and drummed out.

they are fightiing it in court. mind you, these two soldiers didn't abuse anyone, they prevented abuse. shit rolls downhill, not up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Want to weep? Check out General Rick Baccus. Relieved for "kindness"
Former Guantánamo chief clashed with army interrogators

General's sacking cleared way for Pentagon to rewrite rules

The commander of Guantánamo Bay, sacked amid charges from the Pentagon that he was too soft on detainees, said he faced constant tension from military interrogators trying to extract information from inmates.

Brigadier General Rick Baccus was removed from his post in October 2002, apparently after frustrating military intelligence officers by granting detainees such privileges as distributing copies of the Koran and adjusting meal times for Ramadan. He also disciplined prison guards for screaming at inmates.

In one of the general's first interviews since his dismissal, he told the Guardian: "I was mislabelled as someone who coddled detainees. In fact, what we were doing was our mission professionally."

Gen Baccus's unceremonious departure offers a rare insight into how the Pentagon rewrote the rules of warfare to suit the Bush administration's view of a radically changed world following the terror attacks of September 11 2001.

more…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guantanamo/story/0,13743,1219887,00.html


===

<snip>

Gitmo dispute

The Defense Intelligence Agency, which is in charge of interrogating the prisoners held at the prison at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is having trouble getting information. Defense sources tell us interrogators are being undermined by the general in charge of the prison, Army Brig Gen. Rick Baccus, who is being too nice to the 598 captured terrorists.

<snip>

Gen. Baccus in April addressed the detainees and began speaking with the words "peace be with you" and finished with "may God be with you." He promised that as long as he is in charge the prisoners will be "treated humanly."

Gen. Baccus also authorized putting up posters supplied by the International Committee of the Red Cross around the camp. The posters remind prisoners they need only cooperate as required by the Geneva Convention on the rules of war — name, rank and serial number.

The too-kind treatment upset Army Maj. Gen. Michael Dunlavey, who is in charge of the interrogation unit at Guantanamo Bay, nicknamed "Gitmo." A spokesman for Gen. Dunlavey could not be reached for comment.

<snip>

Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough are Pentagon reporters. Mr. Gertz can be reached at 202/636-3274 or by e-mail at bgertz@WashingtonTimes.com . Mr. Scarborough can be reached at 202/636-3208 or by e-mail at rscarborough@WashingtonTimes.com .

http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/ring100402.html
===


Relieved of his command ... Brigadier-General Rick Baccus was accused of wanting to allow the prisoners too many human rights. Photo: AFP/ Rhona Wise
====

<snip>

"The commander of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp - who was criticised in the US press for being too soft on the inmates - has been dismissed" Turns out that he hadn't violated enough of the Geneva Conventions. "In August Gen Baccus told a visiting group of journalists, including the Guardian, that uniformed officers had concerns that the Guantanamo Bay inmates continued to be labelled 'enemy combatants' rather than 'prisoners of war', a classification which would give them more rights under the Geneva conventions and which would assure their release at the end of hostilities. "

<snip>

Officials at the Guantanamo Bay base, a US enclave in Cuba, said Gen Baccus had left because his unit, responsible for running Camp Delta, the base's detention centre, was merged with Joint Task Force 170, a combined unit drawn from the Defence Intelligence Agency, CIA and FBI, which questions the inmates.

His commanding officer in the Rhode Island national guard, Major-General Reginald Centracchio, said he had sacked him for various reasons that "culminated in my losing trust and confidence in him". A national guard spokesman said General Baccus had failed to keep the headquarters up to date with reports on the troops' well-being.

<snip>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,812646,00.html

===============

Soldiers at Guantánamo Bay mark anniversary, carry on
Troops pray, observe moment of silence; detainees aren't told

09/12/2002

Associated Press

GUANTÁNAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba – The 598 detainees at this U.S. outpost thousands of miles from ground zero have no calendars and were not told that Wednesday was Sept. 11.

"We're not making any special announcements to them," said Brig. Gen. Rick Baccus, who heads the detention mission at the base in remote eastern Cuba.

<snip>

"Although the Department of Defense is preparing to conduct military commissions, no trials are imminent," said Maj. Ted Wadsworth, a Pentagon spokesman. "No charges have been approved."

U.S. officials say the detainees are being treated humanely under conditions set by the Geneva Conventions, though Washington has refused to classify them as prisoners of war, calling them unlawful combatants.

"While the public debates the technicalities of how these people should be classified, we will continue to follow the traditions of humane treatment," Brig. Gen. Baccus said.

<snip>

http://www.txcn.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/091202dni...

========================
<snip>

Last week, a brief article in the Washington Post gave a lot more details than we were able to glean from the local media about the recent removal of Vo Dilun-based Brigadier General Rick Baccus as a National Guard commander. Baccus was the head of the military police in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where suspected Al Qaeda members and other alleged terrorists have been held for months. The Post article indicated that Baccus "has been removed from his job amid allegations that he was uncommunicative with superiors and that he improperly tried to interfere in the interrogation of suspected Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners jailed there."

He was also said to have "clashed repeatedly with a number of senior officers, including the head of the camp's interrogation unit, Army Reserve Major General Michael Dunlavey. Some sources said Baccus complained that at times interrogators were rude or too intrusive with the detainees, an assertion Baccus denied in interviews with Rhode Island news organizations."

Now, imagine this incredible outrage: "A number of military officers also have complained that Baccus coddled detainees by beginning his addresses to them over loudspeakers with the phrase, `peace be with you.' Others said Baccus raised questions about some tactics of psychological pressure that interrogators sometimes used on prisoners, even though the interrogators were within the bounds of proper tactics, sources said. Baccus has denied those accusations."

Well, there you go. According to the report, Baccus appears to be a stickler for following Geneva Conventions for detaining prisoners of war. We'll wait until the whole story becomes clearer, but based on this, it sounds as if Rick Baccus is one of the good guys.

<snip>
http://www.providencephoenix.com/archive/pj/02/10/24/pj.html

===

According to a news article of June 21, 2002, at the US Department of Defence website, he said: "As to the detainees, the task force must ensure they're treated humanely within the spirit of the Geneva Convention. Humane treatment means we have to provide them clothing, food, shelter and allow them to practise their religious beliefs."

<snip>

Brigadier-General Rick Baccus refused to soften up the detainees for interrogation purposes. Eventually, he was relieved of his duties on October 9, 2002, for being "too nice" to prisoners. In addition to that, he also lost his appointment with Rhode Island National.

Whatever happened at Abu Ghraib is an offshoot of the shameful removal of Brig Baccus who had tried to treat prisoners with minimal human dignity and eventually lost his job.

Prosecuting and blaming a dozen low-ranking soldiers and guards is implausible. The responsibility lies at a much higher level in the chain of command.

<snip>
http://www.dawn.com/2004/05/10/letted.htm

===

<snip>

Rick Baccus, who headed the military police operation at Guantanamo for seven months in 2002, said that the two sides were sometimes at odds.
Baccus had ordered religious books for the detainees and arranged a special meal schedule for Ramadan, the Muslim holiday. He also proposed more recreation time and showers.

But the interrogators, Baccus said, complained that these were special accommodations that undermined their information gathering.

"They would view that as us giving a reward. And I would view that as humane treatment," said Baccus. "There is nothing inherently wrong. It's just a natural tension that existed." ...

<snip>

Baccus said he taught the MPs to keep their emotions in check when dealing with detainees. The MPs received two weeks of training when they arrived and were under close supervision, he said.


One problem was that soldiers liked taking pictures.

"One of the things you realize is that everybody has a camera," Baccus said. The guards were forbidden to photograph the detainees, but images left the camp anyway, he said.

Baccus said he ordered regular inspections and confiscated photographs from soldiers.

<snip>

Baccus said the specifics of how the MPs and interrogators handled the detainees are classified. "There was no question that we were to treat the detainees humanely," he said...

<snip>

He used three groups to help him watch the MPs: The Red Cross, which had regular access to the facility; his noncommissioned officers, who monitored the cell blocks; and the Muslim chaplins, who relayed complaints from the detainees.

<snip>

http://floricane.typepad.com/buttermilk/sand_storm_the_middle_east /
http://www.projo.com/news/content/projo_20040509_baccus9.19caf1.html

====

<snip>

Rick Baccus, who, a Defense source recalled, mainly "wanted to keep the prisoners happy." Baccus began giving copies of the Qur'an to detainees, and he organized a special meal schedule for Ramadan. "He was even handing out printed 'rights cards'," the Defense source recalled. The upshot was that the prisoners were soon telling the interrogators, "Go f--- yourself, I know my rights." Baccus was relieved in October 2002, and Rumsfeld gave military intelligence control of all aspects of the Gitmo camp, including the MPs.

Pentagon officials now insist that they flatly ruled out using some of the harsher interrogation techniques authorized for the CIA. That included one practice—reported last week by The New York Times—whereby a suspect is pushed underwater and made to think he will be drowned. While the CIA could do pretty much what it liked in its own secret centers, the Pentagon was bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Military officers were routinely trained to observe the Geneva Conventions. According to one source, both military and civilian officials at the Pentagon ultimately determined that such CIA techniques were "not something we believed the military should be involved in."

<snip>
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4989438 /

==
<snip>

The dismissal came as 12 Kuwaiti prisoners mounted the first organised legal and diplomatic effort to challenge the US policy that holds terrorism suspects indefinitely at Guantanamo without court hearings or charges being filed.

<snip>

The 12 captives contend they are not members of al-Qaeda, nor the Taliban, but charity workers who were helping refugees created by Afghanistan's harsh regime when they were caught up in the chaos of the war last northern autumn and winter. In trying to flee to Pakistan, they say, they fell into the hands of Pakistanis who "sold" them to US troops, collecting a bounty.

Their families have retained a Washington firm that specialises in international law.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/10/16/1034561210959.html

===


Brig. Gen. Rick Baccus, 51, who ran the detention operation from March to October 2002, said in an interview Friday that he directed subordinates to make surprise visits to all areas of the detention center and to report mistreatment. He regularly spoke with Muslim chaplains who served the prisoners and maintained "a constant, open dialogue" with the Red Cross, he said.
"They were welcome any time of day or night,"
Baccus said. In contrast to Abu Ghraib, Red Cross representatives were at Guantanamo nearly the entire time he was there, he added.

<snip>

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/05-04/05-17-04/a02wn366.htm

===


American military officers are taught the rules of the Geneva Conventions and told they must ignore illegal orders which violate these treaties, even if they come from "temporary occupants of the White House" as General Douglas MacArthur once described. This caused conflicts last year as a courageous General in charge of security at Gitmo, Brigadier General Rick Baccus, insisted on obeying the Geneva Conventions by referring to the prisoners as POWs. Baccus was removed after irritating Major General Michael Dunlavey, who is in charge of interrogating the prisoners, with his decision to allow the Red Cross to put up posters advising detainees they need only provide their name, rank and number during questioning.

Meanwhile, quiet resistance within the US military delayed plans for military tribunals, avoiding another violation of the Geneva Conventions. The British sent stern warnings that executing British citizens deemed POWs by the Red Cross would not be tolerated, so their nine citizens have been excused from death threats. This past Summer, after months of private discussions about POW treatment at Gitmo, the Red Cross openly declared the US Government in violation of the Geneva Conventions based upon first hand reports from Cuba. Food quality and exercise rights were tied to cooperation during interrogations, reports of physical torture emerged, and it was revealed that three boys under age 16 were in custody. Since Gitmo was run as a high security facility with all activities considered secret, Gitmo commanders were enraged at the prospect of facing an international war crimes tribunal in the future.

<snip>

http://www.g2mil.com/Dec2003.htm

===
<snip>

Speaking in a get-acquainted interview with The Herald and The Associated Press, Brig. Gen. Rick Baccus said it was "not really" of concern to him that Pentagon guidelines for any upcoming Military Commissions consider the captives innocent until proven guilty.

Baccus added that he had not received word yet to prepare for the trials. Guantánamo Bay is considered a likely location to hold them, although none of the 299 prisoners now held at Camp X-Ray have been charged and no venue has been set.

"They're all killers. They all were carrying weapons against United States servicemen," said Baccus, 49, a career army officer, lately with the Rhode Island National Guard, who took command of the prison project March 28.

<snip>

http://www.broward.com/mld/broward/news/3031790.htm

=

Military Uniform = Deceit to CNN

CNN reporter Bob Franken: “Journalists were kept in polite custody during the operation far from here. Military officials cited operational security, what they like to call ‘OpSec.’ So reports of the transfer were provided only by the ones who were in charge of it.”
Franken to Brigadier General Rick Baccus: “How can we know that you’re telling the truth?”
Baccus: “As you are well aware, the International Committee of the Red Cross is on station. They were informed of the move yesterday and they have access to the detainees as of today with no problems, so they could verify that.”
Franken: “May I follow up? The International Red Cross, as you know, does not report to the public, nor do you report whatever their deliberations are. How can the public know that you’re telling the truth about the move?”
Baccus: “Well, as a commissioned officer in the armed forces, I can assure you that what I’ve said is the truth.”
– Story on the move of detainees from Camp X-Ray to Camp Delta, April 29 NewsNight on CNN.

http://www.mediaresearch.org/notablequotables/2002/nq20020513.asp
Entire transcript: http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0204/29/asb.00.html
==

Brigadier-General Rick Baccus, commander of the prison-guard unit at Guantanamo, says "some sections" of the 1949 Geneva Convention on prisoners of war are being applied to the inmates. He lists food and shelter, medical treatment and freedom of religion.

When asked who decides when to follow the conventions and when to ignore them, he replied, "That has been directed by the Secretary of Defence."


But the Geneva Convention says a "competent tribunal" should decide the status of detainees if there is doubt as to whether they are prisoners of war. The idea of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as sole arbiter does not sit well with Michael Byers, a professor of international law at Duke University in North Carolina.

<snip>

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0905-01.htm

==

<snip>

WHEN I sat down with US Brigadier General Rick Baccus in July and
asked him if he was happy that the Guantanamo Bay detainees were
terrorists and if he believed they were being treated humanely, he
grimaced.


The man in charge of the 598 detainees held in cages on the cliff-top
Cuban prison then smiled and trotted out the official line.

"Dangerous men... Geneva Convention... enemy combatants..." he
droned, following the official US line to the letter.

But it was the grimace that gave the game away.

Even the senior officer supervising this extraordinary internment
camp clearly had doubts about the wisdom of Guantanamo Bay.

<snip>

http://squawk.ca/lbo-talk/0210/2114.html

===
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Where did you get that Sivits blew the whistle?
Edited on Wed May-19-04 03:02 PM by Tinoire
I recall Darby but don't remember this about Sivits.

My impression of Sivits is that he's a low-down dirty dog who made a deal with the military that he will, in exchange for being minimally charged, testify that the abuse was not systemic and the brain-child of the 6 others who led his Jesus-loving heart "astray".

I expect the others to refute him vigorously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Blue Collar Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. No, some other dude
who wasn't even charged blew the whistle. Supposedly he slid an anonymous note under the IG's 'door'. I forget his name; it came out later.

Sivit's turned states (covering for Janice Karpinski and MI) so he's getting off w/ a year. Leash girl and her beau won't be so lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. ooppss
Edited on Wed May-19-04 02:56 PM by PaDUer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You've got mail..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. You're right...
look how the first people got off..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. What do I tell the children?
Thus far I've tried to teach them to learn to handle things with words not fists. But, what the heck, that shit was getting old anyway. Now they will know that you can be a sadistic piece of shit and there is hardly any punishment for it.

Great! Just great.....disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. ONE YEAR? BFD, he should have gotten a lot more...
and would have had this been in a civilian court, especially if he was black or hispanic. This is a bullshit sentence, and a bullshit court. I say, send him to the Hague, they know how to deal with this kind of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I suppose with 'good behavior'
he can actually get out in a few months. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. he'll be o.k. if he is born again & totes a bible around in public
and starts a prison ministry with the warden's help. this is a common phenomenon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimson333 Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I don't think there is parole for good behavior for Federal crimes
Edited on Wed May-19-04 02:44 PM by crimson333
last time I checked for the military. However, it has been awhile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey Piperay and mopaul, you've got the right idea there...
hey, I have an idea!? Maybe they could also cut down on Bill Janklow's sentence, you know, just to make it fair? Let's see, now, how can we equate this? Janklow KILLS a man, negligently, and criminally, and gets out in 100 days, so Pvt. Sivits, by all rights, should get out in about 15 minutes for his 'frat pranks', right?
I can't wait to see how this one gets spun by Limpdick and Hannity. This is going to be an interesting afternoon in freeperville (where I live, not the website!).
Oh yeah, Sivits is sorry alright, sorry he got caught! "I should have protected those detainees, not taken the photos." I expect the defense in England's case to be analogous to the Leah Fastow case, something like this: wah, wah, wah, we just can't lock this poor, misguided, woman up and keep her from her child, wah, wah, wah...we'll accept her plea bargain and let her out in time for her baby to be born of a free mother, wah, wah, wah!" Can you tell that I'm right at the brink?
:evilfrown: :grr: :puffpiece: :argh: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. get caught with a marijuana roach, two years
it worked for clyde colson i think. started a prison ministry and still shills for jesus.. might be thinking of another watergate guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Chuck Colson...you are correct, he found Jaaayyyzzzuuus in prison...
and founded the Prison Ministries (what bullshit, even my inmate students think it is a complete sham). I agree with you mo, it is an easy way to get out from under accountability (unless, of course, you happen to be female, in which case you will have the honor of being publically humiliated by an asshole before you are put to death).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC