Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miller, Abizaid and Sanchez Senate Hearing 8:30am ET

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:33 AM
Original message
Miller, Abizaid and Sanchez Senate Hearing 8:30am ET
Edited on Wed May-19-04 07:43 AM by maddezmom
about to start live on CNNI.

Edited to add the I, not sure if it's oon reg CNN or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the heads up.
It's on C-Span as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks!
Looked for it, after reading your post, and found it on C-Span. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Abizaid: we will address the "systemic problems" at Abu Ghraib
he repeated that phrase twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Check out this AP article about the Senate hearing (spin alert)
Edited on Wed May-19-04 07:58 AM by nodictators
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040519/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq&cid=512&ncid=716

3 U.S. Generals to Discuss Prison Abuse

By PAULINE JELINEK, Associated Press Writer

Comments: The first paragraph (one sentence) in the article gives the gist of the story, as usual.

The next two paragraphs present quotes from right-wing House Repub Duncan Hunter, followed later with praise for three other Repub senators:
The Senate Armed Services Committee is "basically driving the story" of prisoner abuse and "jerking out these battlefield commanders" while their troops are in a shooting war, Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., said.

"The Senate has become mesmerized by cameras" and "they have given now probably more publicity to what six people did in the Abu Ghraib prison at 2:30 in the morning than the invasion of Normandy," said Hunter, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

---snip---

Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Susan Collins of Maine have been among the most aggressive questioners of witnesses in hearings that followed publication in the past three weeks of photographs that appear to document abuse at the prison near Baghdad.


The article then discusses yesterday's Senate hearings. Quotes are from Tom DeLay and Jim Inhofe.

See if you can find any mention of Democratic senators anywhere in this article. I can't!


On edit: minor format correction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Warner said Abizaid had been been in Washington for the last 2 days
And that Rumsfeld had requested he appear? So what is Duncan Hunter talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sanchez: takes full responsibility for the "setback"
is that code for abuse/torture pre-approval?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. Did You Catch Sanchez's Opening Statement?
Chilling! Made reference to the turrist impacting elections in Spain, said they would target Iraq elections and then said even OUR election. It was like he was saying "vote for *, or the turrist win"!

Did any Dems call him on this? Seriously, this was one of the most chilling opening statements I have ever heard. Can't fid a link, but can someone post some of his drivel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Sanchez knows he's behind the eightball.
(On MSNBC now)

Somebody with nexis should find the number of public statements by US generals about US elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Now Rumsfeld, Abizaid, and Sanchez have taken "full responsibility" ?
But so far, it is only empty words from each of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sanchez just lied about why MI was put in command of MP's.
Force protection my ass.

Sanchez is blowing smoke for Rummy, and will not succeed. That's ok, since he bears huge responsibility here.

Levin highlights the fact that this testimony puts Sanchez at loggerheads with Taguba.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Camp Cropper Red Cross detailed 50 allegations in July 2003
Abazaid: not all levels of command rec all reports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Serious difference between Sanchez and Taguba
Which Sanchez admits, about what did Sanchez order about putting MI in charge of AG mean. Seams that Sanchez is disagreeing with Karpinsky also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. So far just See No Evil, Hear No Evil and For heaven's sake,
SPEAK No Evil.

Disgusting. If this is the character and integrity of our top brass in the Army, ptooey. Disgusting and disappointing. I'm hoping some more aggressive questioners can shake some shit loose.

I'm particularly disgusted with Abizaid -- his demeanor says it all: I'm not tellin' you guys NUTTIN' and I'm pissed to be here. Quietly defiant.

Warner just saying: I've just been informed another disk of pictures has been found... Wow.

McCain coming up. Go, John, show us your stuff. PLEASE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. McCain: Pappas was in charge of Abu Ghraib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Warner just announced another CD has been discovered. He will say
more to the committee later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. missed that
trying to multi-task :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. here's a link to the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Warner just announced that DoD informed him that they found another CD.
And it will be sent to the committee.

McCain up now, perhaps this will get less bland.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. McCain: to Miller, do you believe you orders were misinterpreted?
not giving a clear answer....yes or no?
Answer by Miller: it was a breakdown in leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. test
Edited on Wed May-19-04 08:34 AM by nostamj
on edit:

sorry, i wasn't able to start a thread and needed to see if i could post at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. They do seem "put out" to be there, don't they?
Who are these buttholes that would question us, the Generals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. Abazaid: to Kennedy, I'll take responsibility for all reports I received
then goes to Sanchez...looks like maybe some or most of the reports were kept at low level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
20. Abazaid: "This system is broken."
Edited on Wed May-19-04 08:44 AM by TacticalPeak
Referring somewhat to report distribution snafus, but it's really responsibility distribution that is showing itself as rotten.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. I am getting from this...
there was no set "chain of command" and that it was deliberate in order to make it more difficult to lay blame on those who are really responsible for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. Roberts assumes the burden of listing all the good things that happened.
I guess some puke has to do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. We need to get these names in order
Bush/cheney
Rumsfeld
Cambone
Bremmer
Sanchez?
Pappas?
Barbara Fast?
Karpinski
mp's

These names with ? marks are all names I've heard in leadership. I'm not sure of the correct order. Can anyone list these in proper order?

Each and every one of the people should resign or do time in jail. these people are supposed to be the leaders. Incompetence or ignorance is no excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
43. Hey! Don't forget
Wolfowitz
Feith
Myers
Kimmitt

OFF WITH THEIR HEADS, said the Red Queen! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. Miller, Boykin, Major Whatshername (MI).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. Byrd has Abizaid by the balls !
Edited on Wed May-19-04 08:54 AM by kentuck
A direct, simple question. Does anyone at the Pentagon have to approve any interrogation methods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. Bird's onto one of the key questions...
Abizaid is dancing as fast as he can and won't give an answer! Bird is asking who had to sign off on the rules of engagement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. Byrd is asking questions too hard for Abizaid to answer straight,
Edited on Wed May-19-04 08:59 AM by TacticalPeak
about Pentagon approval.

The general hangs his head, eyes down. An aide attempts to make the discussion technical.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. yeah, then a military attorney answers for him
not looking good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
27. God bless Byrd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Byrd was great! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. Continued here if interested...
rtsp://video.c-span.org/encoder/iraq051904_sen.rm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. C-span cuts to House as expected. C-span3 picks it up.
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cspan_org.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CSO

Allard mostly puffed.

Reed got some ground covered on who approved what practices, but the answers leave me hoping these guys were sworn in before this started.

Sessions . . . it's hard for me to listen to Mr. Sessions speak. Patience, my soul.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. CNNInternational and BBC still showing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sanchez denies report in paper he approved
Report: Harsh interrogation OK'd for 1 inmate
By John Diamond, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez approved the use of sleep deprivation, intimidation by guard dogs, excessive noise and inducing fear as interrogation methods against a single Iraqi inmate at Abu Ghraib prison, according to a description in the classified annex of a military report on prisoner abuse in Iraq.
A government official who has read most of the 6,000-page classified portion of a report by Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba said the document describes a case in which Sanchez, the senior U.S. military commander in Iraq, approved specific techniques to induce an Iraqi prisoner to talk. The official described in detail the Taguba report's account of the incident. Access to the classified portions of the report is limited.

The disclosure comes a week after Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, the Army's senior intelligence officer, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that he was "not aware of any situation where Gen. Sanchez gave written approval or requested" any of the harsh interrogation methods.

The special interrogation techniques were authorized in guidance used by the U.S. Central Command, which is running the Iraq military operation.

~snip~
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-05-18-harsh-tactics_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
35. My summary of what they are saying....
"We love war, we love war, we love war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Generals get their glory and their stars in wars....
For personal reasons, they love war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
36. Nelson exposes the fault line: MI in tactical command of force protection.
Very well done. Asked Sanchez if he knew of any other instance when this had happened. Sanchez gave a blurry 'No', disguised as a soldierly recognition of commanders' general duty to do what they need to protect their troops.

That's their story and they're sticking to it.

But now c-span3 drops it for the 911 hearings. Damn!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I am getting it streamed from here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hillary up now....
Asking General Miller about document and he knew nothing about it ??

Then to General Sanchez: Asking about a slide that was projected on the wall at Abu Graib prison?? Nothing insidious about that slide..says the Colonel.

For some reason, the military guys look like some leftovers from the old Soviet military...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
41. I think the most stable link is C-Span radio. Just go to www.Cspan.org
and choose the radio link. You don't see their faces but can hear their voices. And it is not interrupted.
senator Graham asking good questions now. He has not seen a more disfunctional military structure in his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
42. Lieberman up now..
Complimenting the miliary....Time to clean the wound and move forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. we'll all move forward - swept away on a wave of pure JOEMENTUM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
46. inhofe now: newspapers are wrong! Abizaid denied the paper
accounts categorically and inhofe believes him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
47. Inhofe: we don't show how much our great soldiers and loved
in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. They Love Us Enough To Kill Us. -NT-
Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
48. inhofe's heart is "broken" because the generals are in front of the
committee. He wants them to go back to be able to continue their great responsibility and doing the great jobs.
Afghanistan SUCCESS STORY????? Where is this guy living? In outer space? With his head up his butt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
50. Inhofe IS An Outrage.
Edited on Wed May-19-04 10:40 AM by jayfish
Where was all this hand-wringing when WJ Clinton was testifying for getting a bj. How important was it for the CiC to be focused on his, most important work.

ON EDIT: Where was the discussion of all the good things that were happening under Clinton.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
51. "These detainees are the worst type of human being, planning to attack the
USA and kill Americans..." Does this sound like Bush*'s speeches before going to war?

I am listening on C-span radio so I don't know which of the generals said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Forgetting that no Iraqi planned to or did kill Americans until we invaded
WTF Inhofe is an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
52. Inhofe NEVER asks questions, just pontificates...
I thought a hearing was for the senators to ASK questions of those testifying but obviously I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:41 AM
Original message
none can give specifics about coalition lives that have been saved
based on any of the interrogation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
56. Are any democrats insisting on an independent inquiry into any...
of this? Most of the repubs on this panel shouldn't be there, they are not there to ask questions, they are there to ensure the cover-up is successful, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
53. Inhofe: punish the soldiers! punish the soldiers! He doesn't believe
anybody higher up is involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
57. Bayh: he is so mellow he might just disappear into the woodwork.But
Edited on Wed May-19-04 10:50 AM by LittleApple81
he asked if the general Abizaid thought that they had enough troops in Iraq. Up to February, yes sir.
But now he says there are certain kinds of troops they don't have enough: MPs, etc.
ESSENTIALLY: THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TROOPS!!!
THE ENABLERS IS WHAT HE IS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH.
He wants more international groups.
Did I miscalculate the number of troops? Maybe, but we have adjusted. The enemy also has a vote (WHAT THE HECK DOES THIS MEAN?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. Abizaid: we will not win this war militarily. No sh*t, Sherlock!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. Bayh mentioned the flag wrapped coffin pictures are important too.
A balance to protect our troops and preserve our honor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
58. I notice Warner is sometimes taking or allowing lots of extra time
Edited on Wed May-19-04 10:50 AM by TacticalPeak
for 'cleanup' at the end of a senator's questions. Beaucoup time after Inhofe. Like a talkingpoint was missed, or an answer not leaving the right impression that needs 'reframing'. I thought the closed session was after this. Seems like they've already worked some of this out?

Abizaid saying that we don't have enough "enablers" (MP's, civil affairs, humint, etc) in country or in the forces period. That's the kind of stuff our allies would have been good at, if aWol had not driven them away.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
61. Lizzy Dole: eeeewwww puke....kiss military bottom, you are wonderful
I just want to take the time to discuss how wonderful your work has been how wonderful you are how grateful we are... this is not what the hearings are for, the last I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
62. Dole now reading a letter from Al-Zarqwai (this guy really has 9 lives,
doesn't him?). She says he has the mobility to move besides Bagdhad. The general agrees with her, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Can you confirm that Al-Zarqawi was the Berg beheader. The
general said he couldn't say for sure. But he can believe.
Does Al-Zarqawi have connection with resistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. Dole: SARIN!!!!! MUSTARD GAS!!! IN BAGDHAD!!!! this woman
is a horror. Are our soldiers protected enough to fight this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. What are you doing to protect civilian (I guess contractors???) in Iraq?
What are these questions doing during this hearing? This hearing is to find out about ABUSES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. CONTRACTORS ARE HEROS TOO AND DOING GOD'S WORK!!!!
One of the military (radio, sorry I don't know which). What is this crap!!!! are our generals fundies too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. Dole reeeeeks!
What mindless bs.

There's bad guys in Iraq, and in Iraq, guess what: bad guys.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
68. Now Nelson: could you please help us clarify here:
You used the words: it is a hard thing, it would take a long time.
We keep getting different statements that are interpreted different ways.
Do you consider part of your mission to disarm the milita like Alq-Sadr?
Yes. Said the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #68
70. Does your mission include provide security in the streets?
The guy is reluctant but says "unfortunately that is the case".
In some areas in Iraq iraqi police forces are doing really great (by Iraqi standards ).
They want to fight for their country but they want to fight for Iraqis, after they respond to Iraqis it will improve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
69. Nelson asks if Abizaid's mission is to destroy the militias.
Abizaid says disarm or destroy bad ones like al-Sadr's, and try to work with good ones.

That's close to taking sides in a civil war. Come to think of it, guess that's something we have to do if we remain there. :(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
71. Hawaii's Akaka up now...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. Question about contractors. They are responsible to the proper
units. If you are an interrogator they respond to the intelligence units. They work and are responsible to the army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. What kinds of contractors do you have?
any contractors that are from 3rd world nations.
Yes, translators. they do an excellent job for us. Can you name some of the nations. Answer: no, sorry I cannot.
They are responsible to DOD. Answer: we will get the information to you about the countries where the interrogators are from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. You told Karspinski that you were going to Gitmoize Iraq's prison.
Asked of Miller.
Miller: I never said that.
Some of your instructions might be misconstrued by the civilian contractors. There were no civilian contractors at that time, they were on their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Question for Abizaid: trying to change army doctrine.
was it related to systemic abuse. Abizaid: no related to interrelationship of army and intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. Miller mentions that contractors worked on intel 'fusion'.
That's weird. That's just a few folks at HQ. We couldn't be THAT short of military intel bodies. Not sure I like the smell of that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
77. Lyndsey Graham is actually acting as a responsible Sen.
For a Pub., Graham has asked some very responsible and probing questions during these hearings, both today and in the past. I thought it was funny that he inserted "Generals, do you feel it is harming the war effort by asking you to be here today?" Obvious smack in the head to Sen. Inhof. HE HE

I guess his being a former JAG Officer is overshadowing his partisanship for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
78. Nice of Shrub to schedule this press opportunity to step on the hearing.
CNN, MSNBC, Faux. Ramblerambleramble, gimme my energy policy bs.

What a fool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC