Polygraphs Don't Give True Story
By Noah Shachtman
02:00 AM May. 14, 2004 PT
The military may have ways -- gruesome ways -- of making people talk, as the Abu Ghraib prison scandal has shown. But it still doesn't have a reliable method for figuring out whether those people are telling the truth or not.
Nearly 75 years since the introduction of the polygraph, there's still nothing close to a foolproof lie detector. Traditional methods for catching a fibber have been battered by scientific study. And, despite endless waves of hype, the high-tech alternatives -- brain scans, thermal images and voice analysis -- have withered under scrutiny, or remain largely unproven.
"Everybody would love to have a lie detector that works. But wanting it isn't going to make it happen," said Stephen Kosslyn, a Harvard University professor of psychology.
"You can flip a coin, and get the same results," said Mike Ritz, a former Army interrogator who now trains people to withstand questioning.
More at:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,63452,00.html--
IMHO the polygraph is the most intrusive, insulting, and useless thing to ever come down the pike. I was polygraphed once, and it did nothing but piss me off from beginning to end. I will never submit to it again.