Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Berg was killed: so Shrub could prove terrorist link to Saddam.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:23 PM
Original message
Why Berg was killed: so Shrub could prove terrorist link to Saddam.

Well, Shrub finally came out with the new neocon stratigy.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&e=2&u=/nm/20040514/pl_nm/campaign_bush_dc

(snip)
At a fund-raising lunch in Bridgeton, Missouri, Bush said Zarqawi was an example of the threat posed by the ousted Iraqi leader. "We knew he (Saddam) had terrorist ties. The person responsible for the Berg death, Zarqawi, was in and out of Baghdad prior to our arrival, for example," Bush said.

(snip)
Although Bush administration officials had raised the possibility Saddam helped al Qaeda plan the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, Bush eventually said there was no evidence. Bush has previously cited Zarqawi as a link between Saddam and al Qaeda.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, see my post, Bush is the terrorist
He let them go about their business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpster_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. rumors of a Bush-Berg photoshop?
I heard a rumor of a photoshopping of a still from that video, where Bush's head had been subbed for Zarqawi's head, so it looked like Bush was cutting off Berg's head. Anyone seen this one? Wouldn't that be illegal to make such a photoshop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Zarqawi is a fundamentalist who hates Saddam for being secular.
Saying that Zarqawi was in Baghdad, therefore he was in cahoots with Saddam, is like saying anyone who visits DC must be in cahoots with the US govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bingo,
but Shrub made this speech TODAY!!!!

He's STILL spouting this bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You are overestimating the "intelligence" of the wingnuts. They
Edited on Fri May-14-04 08:28 PM by LittleApple81
want to believe, they will believe anything. But I don't think Bush was counting on the Berg father... he seems like the person that will not stay quiet and take this crap being handed down from the misadministration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3.  Hello!
Earth to bush*: nobody's listening. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty soon Inannity, Rush, O'Lielly and Faux will be repeating this
ad naseum and by the middle of next week 40% of the population will believe it.

These assholes have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Big surprise
and people like my mother will think it means he was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Terrorist links are already disproved
because the terrorist are only in there now that there is chaos and a power vacuum. Charges that bush had this kid killed are not out of the realm of possibility but are definitely premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No2W2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Right, the links have been thoroughly disproved
Edited on Fri May-14-04 08:34 PM by No2W2004
So why is Shrub making this speech TODAY?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's out campaigning on our dime
oh he's supposed to reimburse us for the expense but i'm sure that gets screwed around with, we are in a huge mess right now and all he does is go out and make stump speeches for contributions. Real presidential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. But wait! Saddam's in custody
And the world is SO much safer as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Good point. Anyone who ridiculed Howard Dean for saying
Good point. Anyone who ridiculed Howard Dean for saying the capture of Saddam didn't make the US safer should apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. So Berg "event" = bush right to invade Iraq
Nobody would buy this as a plot to a UPN show, much less as a justification for the exponentially mounting costs of what bush has done here.

Won't float.

But then, I don't think this was the primary benefit to the regime - justification for invading Iraq, that is. I believe they, the regime, desperately needed something big enough to throw in front of the oncoming train that was/still is the torture scandal. And the Berg event did that, to an extent.

I believe this new effort to proclaim the Berg video = saddam/terrorist ties = right to invade is simply trying to milk a dry teat - if you'll pardon the expression.

The Berg event (a buscho production, imho) is already subsiding, and courts-martial, and probably more pics, are yet to come.

Obvious desperate measures by a desperate gang of criminals. Yes, I mean the bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC